skip to main content
10.1145/2658861.2658895acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageshaiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Potential of imprecision: exploring vague language in agent instructors

Published:29 October 2014Publication History

ABSTRACT

As we find greater potential for agent instructors, we must be aware of how their language use can affect the user and interaction as a whole. This study investigates the use of intentionally imprecise or vague language as a communicative strategy to mitigate the impact of instructions. We look at the effects it has on improving the perception of agents and user performance. A series of assembly tasks were ran in which users constructed Lego models with the spoken instructions of vague and non-vague agents. Results show that though the non-vague agent was seen as more direct and authoritative, responses to other attributes and performance were much more varied. Findings suggest there is potential for vague language human-agent interaction, though there are several obstacles in agent design to overcome first.

References

  1. Adolphs, S., Atkins, S. and Harvey, K. Caught between professional requirements and interpersonal needs: Vague language in healthcare contexts, Vague Language Explored (2007), pp. 62--78.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. Ball, M. and Callaghan, V. Introducing Intelligent Environments, Agents and Autonomy to Users. IEEE (2011), pp. 382--385. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Bickmore, T. and Cassell, J. Relational Agents: A Modl and Implementation of Building User Trust. Proc. Human Factors in Computing Systems, ACM Press, New York, NY (2001), pp. 396--403. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Bickmore, T. and Cassell, J. Social Dialogue with Embodied Conversational Agents, Advances in natural multimodal dialogue systems. Springer (2005), pp.23--54.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Brown, P. and Levinson, S.C. Politeness: Some universals on language usage. Cambridge University Press (1987).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Bulitko, V.V. and Wilkins, D.C. Automated instructor assistant for ship damage control. AAAI/IAAI (1999), pp.778--785. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Carter, R. Orders of reality: CANCODE, communication and culture. ELT Journal, 52 (1998), pp. 43--56.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. Chan, V., Ray, P. and Parameswaran, N. Mobile e-Health monitoring: an agent-based approach, IET communications, 2 (2008), pp.223--230.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Channel, J. Vague Language. Oxford University Press (1994).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Cutting, J. Vague Language Explored. Palgrave Macmillan (2007).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Doswell, J. and Harmeyer, K. Extending the serious game boundary: Virtual instructors in mobile mixed reality learning games. Digital Games Research Association International Conference, Citeseer (2007)Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Goffman, E. The presentation of self in everyday life. Garden City, NY (2002).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Goffman, E. Interaction Ritual: Essays on Face-to-Face Behaviour. Anchor Books (1967).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Heylen, D., Nijholt, R., Den Akker, O.P. and Vissers, M. Socially intelligent tutor agents. Intelligent Virtual Agents, Springer (2003), pp.341--347.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Koester, A. "About twelve thousand or so": Vagueness in North American and UK offices, Vague Language Explored (2007), pp. 40--6Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  16. Lakoff, G. Hedges: A Study in meaning criteria and the logic of fuzzy concepts. Springer (1975)Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Maes, P. Agents that reduce work and information overload, Communications of the ACM, 37 (1994), pp.30--40. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. McCarthy, M. and Carter, R. As visible patterns of interaction, Explorations in Corpus Linguistics (2006).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Prince, E.F., Frader. J. and Bosk, C. On hedging in physician-physician discourse. Linguistics and the Professions (1982), pp.83--97.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Rowland, T. 'Well maybe not exactly, but it's around fifty basically' Vague language in mathematics classrooms. Vague Language Explored (2007), pp.79--96.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  21. Schaafstal, A. M., Johnston, J. H. and Oser, R. L. Training teams for emergency management, Computers in Human Behaviour, 17 (2001), pp.615--626.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  22. Sukthankar, G., Shumaker, R. and Lewis, M. Intelligent agents as teammates, Theories of Team Cognition: Cross-Disciplinary Perspectives (2012), pp.313--343.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. Tamagawa, R., Watson, C.I., Kuo, I.H., Macdonald, B.A. and Broadbent, E. The Effects of Synthesized Voice Accents on User Perceptions of Robots, International Journal of Social Robotics, 3 (2011), pp. 253--262.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  24. Torrey, C., Fussell, S. and Kiesler, S. How a robot should give advice, Proceedings of the 8th ACM/IEEE international conference on Human-robot interaction, IEEE Press, Tokyo, Japan (2013), pp. 275--282. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. Trappes-Lomax, H. Vague language as a means of self-protective avoidance: Tension management in conference talks. Vague Language Explored (2007), pp.117--137.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  26. Wang, Wang, N., Johnson, W.L., Mayer, R.E., Rizzo, P. Shaw, E. and Collins, H. The politeness effect: Pedagogical agents and learning outcomes, International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 66 (2008), pp. 98--112. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Potential of imprecision: exploring vague language in agent instructors

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Other conferences
      HAI '14: Proceedings of the second international conference on Human-agent interaction
      October 2014
      412 pages
      ISBN:9781450330350
      DOI:10.1145/2658861

      Copyright © 2014 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 29 October 2014

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

      Acceptance Rates

      HAI '14 Paper Acceptance Rate27of62submissions,44%Overall Acceptance Rate121of404submissions,30%

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader