skip to main content
10.1145/2660398.2660423acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesgroupConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Informing Digital Cognitive Aids Design for Emergency Medical Work by Understanding Paper Checklist Use

Published:09 November 2014Publication History

ABSTRACT

We examine the use of a paper-based checklist during 48 simulated trauma resuscitations to inform the design of digital cognitive aids for safety-critical medical teamwork. Our analysis focused on team communication and interaction behaviors as physician leaders led resuscitations and administered the checklist. We found that the checklist increased the amount of communication between the leader and the team, but did not compromise the leader's interactions with the environment. In addition, we observed several changes in team dynamics: the checklist facilitated collaborative decision making and process reflections, but it also made some team members reactive rather than proactive. As the push toward digitizing medical work continues, we expect that paper checklists will soon be replaced by their digital counterparts. Designing interactive cognitive aids for medical domains, however, poses many challenges. Our results offer directions for how these tools could be designed to support medical work in increasingly digital environments.

References

  1. Berg, M. and Bowker, G. The multiple bodies of the medical record. The Sociological Quarterly 38, 3 (1997), 513--537.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. Cabitza, F., Sarini, M., Simone, C., and Telaro, M. When once is not enough: the role of redundancy in a hospital ward setting. Proc. Group 2005, ACM Press (2005), 158--167. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Carter, E. A., et al. Adherence to ATLS primary and secondary surveys during pediatric trauma resuscitation. Resuscitation 84, 1 (2012), 66--71.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Chen, Y. Documenting transitional information in EMR. Proc. CHI 2010, ACM Press (2010), 1787--1796. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Chisholm, C. D., Collison, E. K., Nelson, D. R., and Cordell, W. H. Emergency department workplace interruptions: are emergency physicians "interrupt-driven" and "multitasking"? Academic Emergency Medicine 7, 11 (2000), 1239--1243.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. Chua, R. V, Cordell, W. H, Ernsting, K. L, Bock, H. C, and Nyhuis AW. Accuracy of bar codes versus handwriting for recording trauma resuscitation events. Annals of Emergency Medicine 22, 10 (1993), 1545--1550.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. Chua, W. C., D'Amours, S. K., Sugrue, M., Caldwell, E., and Brown, K. Performance and consistency of care in admitted trauma patients. ANZ Journal of Surgery 79, 6 (2009), 443--448.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. Ellis, C. A., Gibbs, S. J., and Rein, G. L. Groupware: Some issues and experiences. Communications of the ACM 34, 1 (1991), 39--58. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Fitzpatrick, G. Integrated care and the working record. Health Informatics Journal 40, 4 (2004), 291--302.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Gawande, A. The Checklist Manifesto: How to Get Things Right. Metropolitan Books, New York, NY, USA, 2009.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Gertner, A. S., Webber, B. L., and Clarke, J. R. Upholding the maxim of relevance during patient-centered activities, Proc. ANLC 1994, ACM Press (1994), 125--131. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Hales, B., Terblanche, M., Fowler, R., and Sibbald, W. Development of medical checklists for improved quality of patient care. International Journal for Quality in Health Care 20, 1 (2008), 22--30.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Hart, E. M. and Owen, H. Errors and omissions in anesthesia: A pilot study using a pilot's checklist. Anesthesia & Analgesia 101, 1 (2005), 246--250.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  14. Heath, C. and Luff, P. Documents and professional practice: 'bad' organisational reasons for 'good' clinical records. Proc. CSCW 1996, ACM Press (1996), 354--363. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Landis, J. and Koch, G. G. The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics 33, (1977) 159--174.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  16. Lingard, L., et al. Getting teams to talk: Development and pilot implementation of a checklist to promote inter-professional communication in the OR. Quality and Safety in Health Care 14, 5 (2005), 340--346.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  17. Parsons, S., et al. Improving ATLS performance in simulated pediatric trauma resuscitation using a checklist. Annals of Surgery 259, 4 (2014), 807--813.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  18. Pronovost, P. J., Goeschel, C. A., Colantuoni, E., Watson, S., Lubomski, L. H., Berenholtz, S. M., and Needham, D. Sustaining reductions in catheter related bloodstream infections in Michigan intensive care units. British Medical Journal 340, (2010), c309.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  19. Selen, A. and Harper, R. The Myth of the Paperless Office. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, USA, 2002. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. Tang, A., Lanir, J., Greenberg, S., and Fels, S. Supporting transitions in work: Informing large display application design by understanding whiteboard use. Proc. GROUP 2009, ACM Press (2009), 149--158. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. Weick, K. E. and Roberts, K. H. Collective mind in organizations: Heedful interrelating on flight decks. Administrative Science Quarterly 38, 3 (1993), 357--381.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  22. Wu, L., Cirimele, J., Card, S., Klemmer, S., Chu, L., and Harrison, K. Maintaining shared mental models in anesthesia crisis care with nurse tablet input and large-screen displays. Adjunct Proc. UIST 2011, ACM Press (2011), 71--72. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. Wu, L., Cirimele, J., Leach, K., Card, S., Chu, L., Harrison, K. T., and Klemmer, S. R. Supporting crisis response with dynamic procedure aids. Proc. DIS 2014, ACM Press (2014), 315--324. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. Wurster, L. A., Groner, J. I., and Hoffman, J. Electronic documentation of trauma resuscitations at a Level 1 pediatric trauma center. J. of Trauma Nursing 19, 2 (2012), 76--79.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  25. Zhou, X., Ackerman, M., and Zheng, K. Doctors and psychosocial information: Records and reuse in inpatient care. Proc. CHI 2010, ACM Press (2010), 1767--1776. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Informing Digital Cognitive Aids Design for Emergency Medical Work by Understanding Paper Checklist Use

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      GROUP '14: Proceedings of the 2014 ACM International Conference on Supporting Group Work
      November 2014
      340 pages
      ISBN:9781450330435
      DOI:10.1145/2660398

      Copyright © 2014 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 9 November 2014

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

      Acceptance Rates

      GROUP '14 Paper Acceptance Rate27of90submissions,30%Overall Acceptance Rate125of405submissions,31%

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader