skip to main content
10.1145/2661435.2661438acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagespdcConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Structuring future social relations: the politics of care in participatory practice

Published:06 October 2014Publication History

ABSTRACT

This paper explores the political shifts that take place in participatory design (PD) when the focus is upon co-designing ongoing future societal relations, beyond the immediacy of designing objects or services during project-time. Reflecting on connectedness, it looks at the politics of participation through the lens of people's interdependence, using feminist concepts of 'care' to explore the ethical commitments of designing. In particular, it speaks to Greenbaum's claim, 20 years ago, that 'we have the obligation to provide people with the opportunity to influence their own lives' (1993:47). We explore the questions this raises now, as we design in an increasingly distributed and heterogeneous socio-technical context, to give a contemporary take on long-term commitments to political and ethical outcomes in participatory design. Three contrasting case studies are interrogated to discuss how structuring of social relations was enabled, offering insights into what the politics of care might mean.

References

  1. Akama, Y. Passing on, handing over, letting go -- the passage of embodied design methods for disaster preparedness, Proc. Service Design and Innovation Conference, 2014:173--183.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Akama, Y. A 'way of being': Zen and the art of being a human-centred practitioner. Design Philosophy Papers, 2012, 1:1--10.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Akama, Y. and A. Prendiville, Embodying, enacting and entangling design: a phenomenological view to co-designing services. Swedish Design Research Journal, 2013. 1:29--40.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Akama, Y., S. Chaplin, and P. Fairbrother. Social Networks and bushfire preparedness, Proc. International Conference on Risk-informed Disaster Management: Planning for Response, Recover and Resilience. 2013: 1--10Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Akama, Y. and T. Ivanka. What community? Facilitating awareness of 'community' through Playful Triggers. Proc. PDC 2010:11--20. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. A. Telier, Design Things, MIT Press, 2011.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Bannon, L. J., & Ehn, P. Design: design matters in Participatory Design. In J. Simonsen & T. Robertson (Eds.), Routledge International Handbook of Participatory Design, London and New York: Routledge, 2013: 37--63 (hereafter RIHPD).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Beck, E. E. P for Political: Participation is not Enough, Scandinavian Journal of Information Systems, Summer 2002.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Brandt, E., Binder T., & Sanders, E., Tools and Techniques: Ways to engage telling, making and enacting, in RIHPD, 2013Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Burns, C., Cottam, H., Vanstone, C., & Winhall, J. RED paper 02: Transformation design, Design Council, London, 2006.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. CSPR. What is Participatory Design?, Computer Professionals For Social Responsibility, (accessed 20th Feb 2014 from http://cpsr.org/issues/pd/introInfo/ (last updated May 06, 2005).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. DiSalvo, C., Clement A., & Pipek V. Communities: Participatory Design for, with and by Communities, in RIHPD, 2013:182--210.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Dorrestijn, S. & Verbeek, P. P. Technology, wellbeing, and freedom: The legacy of utopian design. International Journal of Design, 2013, 7(3): 45--56.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Ehn, P. Participation in design things, Proc. PDC 2008: 92--101. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Greenbaum, J. PD: A personal statement, CACM 1993. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Haraway, D. J. When Species Meet. Minneapolis and London: University of Minesota Press, 2008.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Karasti, H. Taking PD to Multiple Contexts: A reply to Kyng, Scandinavian Journal of Information Systems, 22(1), 2010Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Kyng, M. Bridging the Gap between Politics and Techniques: On the next practices of participatory design. Scandinavian Journal of Information Systems, 2010, 22(1):49--68Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Light, A. Democratising Technology: A Method, in Designing for the 21st Century: Interdisciplinary Methods and Findings (ed T. Inns), Gower, Ashgate Publishing, 2009:132--145.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Light, A. HCI as heterodoxy: Technologies of identity and the queering of interaction with computers, Interacting with Computers, 2011, 23(5):430--438 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. Light, A., Milligan, A., Bond, L., McIntosh, L. and Botten, C. (2013) High Tea at the Conviviality Café: Research Tool or Design Intervention?, Research through Design'13, 2013Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. Lindström, K. & Stahl, A. (2014). Patchworking: Publics In-The-Making. Doctoral Thesis, Malmö University, Malmö, Sweden.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. Meroni, A., & Sangiorgi, D. Design for services. Farnham, England: Gower, 2011.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. Puig de la Bellacasa, M. Matters of care in technoscience: Assembling neglected things. Social Studies of Science, 2011. 41(1):85--106.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  25. Puig de la Bellacasa, M. Nothing comes without its world: thinking with care. The Sociological Review, 2012, 60(2):197--216.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  26. Robertson, T., & Simonsen, J. Participatory Design: an introduction, in RHIPD, 2013:1--18.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. Robertson, T., & Wagner, I. Ethics: engagement, representation and politics-in-action, in RHIPD, 2013: 64--85.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  28. Sangiorgi, D. Transformative Services and Transformation Design. International Journal of Design, 2011, 5(2):29--40.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  29. Star, S. L. & Ruhleder, K. Steps toward an ecology of infrastructure: Design and access for large information spaces. Information Systems Research, 1996, 7(1):111--134.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  30. Willis, A. Ontological Designing, Design Philosophy Papers, 2006. (2):1--11.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Index Terms

  1. Structuring future social relations: the politics of care in participatory practice

        Recommendations

        Comments

        Login options

        Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

        Sign in
        • Published in

          cover image ACM Other conferences
          PDC '14: Proceedings of the 13th Participatory Design Conference: Research Papers - Volume 1
          October 2014
          178 pages
          ISBN:9781450322560
          DOI:10.1145/2661435

          Copyright © 2014 ACM

          Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

          Publisher

          Association for Computing Machinery

          New York, NY, United States

          Publication History

          • Published: 6 October 2014

          Permissions

          Request permissions about this article.

          Request Permissions

          Check for updates

          Qualifiers

          • research-article

          Acceptance Rates

          PDC '14 Paper Acceptance Rate17of62submissions,27%Overall Acceptance Rate49of289submissions,17%

        PDF Format

        View or Download as a PDF file.

        PDF

        eReader

        View online with eReader.

        eReader