skip to main content
10.1145/2663806.2663824acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesesemConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

NotifEye: using interactive glasses to deal with notifications while walking in public

Published:11 November 2014Publication History

ABSTRACT

In this paper we explore the use of interactive eyewear in public. We introduce NotifEye, an application that allows a person to receive social network notifications on interactive glasses while walking on a busy street. The prototype uses a minimalistic user interface (UI) for interactive glasses to help people focus their attention on their surroundings and supports discreet interaction by using a finger rub pad to take action on incoming notifications. We studied pragmatic and hedonic aspects of the prototype during a pedestrian navigation task in a city center. We found that, despite the potential risk of overwhelming people with information, participants were able to keep track of their surroundings as they dealt with incoming notifications. Participants also positively valued the use of a discreet device to provide input for interactive glasses. Finally, participants reflected on their (evolving) perception of interactive glasses, indicating that glasses should become smaller, more comfortable to wear, and somewhat of a fashion accessory.

References

  1. Amft, O. and Lukowicz, P. From Backpacks to Smartphones: Past, Present, and Future of Wearable Computers. IEEE Pervasive Computing 8, 3 (2009), 8--13. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Ashbrook, D., Baudisch, P. and White, S. Nenya: subtle and eyes-free mobile input with a magnetically-tracked finger ring. Proc. CHI '11, ACM Press (2011), 2043--2046. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Baber, C. Wearable computers: A human factors review. Human--Computer Interaction 13, 2 (2001), 123--145.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Bailly, G., Müller, J., Rohs, R., Wigdor, D. and Kratz, S. ShoeSense: a new perspective on gestural interaction and wearable applications. Proc. CHI '12, ACM Press (2012), 1239--1248. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Bartram, L., Ware, C. and Calvert, T. Moticons: detection, distraction and task. Int. J. Hum.-Comput. Stud. 58, 5 (2003), 515--545. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Bergstrom-Lehtovirta, J., Oulasvirta, A. and Brewster, S. The effects of walking speed on target acquisition on a touchscreen interface. Proc. MobileHCI '11, ACM Press (2011), 143--146. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Billinghurst, M., Starner, T. Wearable devices: new ways to manage information. Computer 32, 1 (1999), 57--64. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Costanza, E., Inverso, S. A. and Allen, R. Toward subtle intimate interfaces for mobile devices using an EMG controller. Proc. CHI '05, ACM Press (2005), 481--489. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Costanza, E., Inverso, S. A., Pavlov, E., Allen, R. and Maes, P. eye-q: eyeglass peripheral display for subtle intimate notifications. Proc. MobileHCI '06, ACM (2006), 211--218. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Feiner, S., MacIntyre, B., Haupt, M. and Solomon, E. Windows on the world: 2D windows for 3D augmented reality. Proc. UIST '93, ACM Press (1993), 145--155. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Fischer, J. E., Yee, N., Bellotti, V., Good, N., Benford, S. and Greenhalgh, S. Effects of content and time of delivery on receptivity to mobile interruptions. Proc. MobileHCI '10, ACM Press (2010), 103--112. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Fischer, J. E., Greenhalgh, C. and Benford, S. Investigating episodes of mobile phone activity as indicators of opportune moments to deliver notifications. Proc. MobileHCI '11, ACM Press (2011), 181--190. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Gabbard, J. L., Swan, J. E., Zedlitz, J. and Winchester, W. W. More than meets the eye: An engineering study to empirically examine the blending of real and virtual color spaces. Proc. VR '10, IEEE (2010), 79--86. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Gemperle, F., Kasabach, C., Stivoric, J., Bauer, M. and Martin, R. Design for Wearability. Proc. ISWC '98, IEEE (1998), 116--122. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Goffman, E. The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life. Penguin Books, 1990.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Hassenzahl, M. The interplay of beauty, goodness, and usability in interactive products. Human-Computer Interaction 19, 4 (2004), 319--349. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Ho, J. and Intille, S. S. Using context-aware computing to reduce the perceived burden of interruptions from mobile devices. Proc. CHI '05, ACM Press (2005), 909--918. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. Horvitz, E., Koch, P. and Apacible, J. BusyBody: creating and fielding personalized models of the cost of interruption. Proc. CSCW '04, ACM Press (2004), 507--510. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. Iqbal, S. and Bailey, B. P. Leveraging characteristics of task structure to predict the cost of interruption. Proc. CHI '06, ACM Press (2006), 741--750. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. Kawakita, J. The original KJ method. Tokyo: Kawakita Research Institute, 1991.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. Kerr, S. J., Rice, M. D., Teo, Y., Wan, M., Cheong, Y. L., Ng, J., Ng-Thamrin, L., Thura-Myo, T. and Wren, D. Wearable mobile augmented reality: evaluating outdoor user experience. Proc. VRCAI '11, ACM (2011), 209--216. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. Kortuem, G., Schneider, J., Preuitt, D., Thompson, T. G. C., Fickas, S. and Segall, Z. When Peer-to-Peer comes Face-to-Face: Collaborative Peer-to-Peer Computing in Mobile Ad hoc Networks. Proc. P2P '01, IEEE (2001), 75--91. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. Lucero, A. and Arrasvuori, J. PLEX Cards: a source of inspiration when designing for playfulness. Proc. Fun and Games '10, ACM Press (2010), 28--37. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. Lucero, A., Holopainen, J. and Jokela, T. Pass-them-around: collaborative use of mobile phones for photo sharing. Proc. CHI '11, ACM Press (2011), 1787--1796. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. Lucero, A., Holopainen, J. and Jokela, T. MobiComics: collaborative use of mobile phones and large displays for public expression. Proc. MobileHCI '12, ACM Press (2012), 383--392. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  26. Lucero, A., Lyons, K., Vetek, A., Järvenpää, T., White, S., Salmimaa, M. Exploring the interaction design space for interactive glasses. CHI EA '13, ACM (2013), 1341--1346. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  27. Lyons, K., Nguyen, D., Ashbrook, D. and White, S. Facet: a multi-segment wrist worn system. Proc. UIST '12, ACM Press (2012), 123--130. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  28. Mann, S. Wearable Computing-Toward Humanistic Intelligence. IEEE Intelligent Systems 16, 3 (2001), 10--15. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  29. McAtamney, G. and Parker, C. An examination of the effects of a wearable display on informal face-to-face communication. Proc. CHI '06, ACM Press (2006), 45--54. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  30. McCullough, M. On attention to surroundings. interactions 19, 6 (2012), 40--49. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  31. McFarlane, D. Coordinating the interruption of people in human-computer interaction. Proc. INTERACT '99, IOS Press, (1999), 295--303.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  32. Mistry, P., Maes, P. and Chang, L. WUW - wear Ur world: a wearable gestural interface. Proc. CHI EA '09, ACM Press (2009), 4111--4116. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  33. Montero, C. S., Alexander, J., Marshall, M. T. and Subramanian, S. Would you do that?: understanding social acceptance of gestural interfaces. Proc. MobileHCI '10, ACM Press (2010), 275--278. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  34. Mustonen, T., Berg, M., Kaistinen, J., Kawai, T. and Häkkinen, J. Visual task performance using a monocular see-through head-mounted display (HMD) while walking. Journal of Experimental Psychology 19, 4 (2013), 333--344.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  35. Oulasvirta, A., Tamminen, S., Roto, V. and Kuorelahti, J. Interaction in 4-second bursts: the fragmented nature of attentional resources in mobile HCI. Proc. CHI '05, ACM Press (2005), 919--928. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  36. Pingel, T. J. and Clarke, K. C. Assessing the usability of a wearable computer system for outdoor pedestrian navigation. Autocarto ACSM (2005).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  37. Pirhonen, A., Brewster, S. and Holguin, C. Gestural and audio metaphors as a means of control for mobile devices. Proc. CHI '02, ACM Press (2002), 291--298. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  38. Reeves, S., Benford, S., O'Malley, C. and Fraser, M. Designing the spectator experience. Proc. CHI '05, ACM Press (2005), 741--750. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  39. Rekimoto, J. GestureWrist and GesturePad: Unobtrusive Wearable Interaction Devices. Proc. ISWC '01, IEEE (2001), 21--27. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  40. Rico, J. and Brewster, S. Usable gestures for mobile interfaces: evaluating social acceptability. Proc. CHI '10, ACM Press (2010), 887--896. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  41. Saponas, T. S., Harrison, C. and Benko, H. PocketTouch: through-fabric capacitive touch input. Proc. UIST '11, ACM Press (2011), 303--308. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  42. Siewiorek, D., Smailagic, A. and Starner, T. Wearable computers. Chapter 15. In The human-computer interaction handbook, 2nd Edition, 2008.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  43. Starner, T., Mann, S., Rhodes, B., Levine, J., Healey, J., Kirsch, D., Picard, R. and Pentland, A. Augmented reality through wearable computing. Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments 6, 4 (1997), 386--398.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  44. Stellmach, S. and Dachselt, R. Look & touch: gaze-supported target acquisition. Proc. CHI '12, ACM Press (2012), 2981--2990. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  45. Thomas, B. H. and Piekarski, W. Glove based user interaction techniques for augmented reality in an outdoor environment. Virtual Reality 6 (2002), 167--180.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  46. Williamson, J. R., Crossan, A. and Brewster, S. Multimodal mobile interactions: usability studies in real world settings. Proc. ICMI '11, ACM Press (2011), 361--368. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. NotifEye: using interactive glasses to deal with notifications while walking in public

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Other conferences
      ACE '14: Proceedings of the 11th Conference on Advances in Computer Entertainment Technology
      November 2014
      422 pages
      ISBN:9781450329453
      DOI:10.1145/2663806

      Copyright © 2014 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 11 November 2014

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

      Acceptance Rates

      ACE '14 Paper Acceptance Rate36of90submissions,40%Overall Acceptance Rate36of90submissions,40%

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader