skip to main content
10.1145/2665943.2665950acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesccsConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Glove: A Bespoke Website Fingerprinting Defense

Published:03 November 2014Publication History

ABSTRACT

Website fingerprinting attacks have recently emerged as a serious threat against web browsing privacy mechanisms, such as SSL, Tor, and encrypting tunnels. Researchers have proposed numerous attacks and defenses, and the Tor project currently includes both network- and browser-level defenses against these attacks, but published defenses have high overhead, poor security, or both.

In this paper we present preliminary results of {Glove}, a new SSH based defense. Glove is based on the observation that current defenses are expensive not because website traces are different, but because the defense, operating blindly, does not know how to add cover traffic and therefore, puts it everywhere. Instead, Glove uses existing knowledge of a websites traces to add cover traffic conservatively while maintaining high levels of security. Further, Glove satisfies the information theoretic definitions of security defined in prior work -- i.e., it is resistant to any fingerprinting adversary. Our simulations show that Glove performs better than all currently proposed SSH based defenses in terms of the security-overhead trade-off.

References

  1. Donald J Berndt and James Clifford. Using dynamic time warping to find patterns in time series. In KDD workshop, 1994.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Xiang Cai, Rishab Nithyanand, and Rob Johnson. Cs-buflo: A congestion sensitive website fingerprinting defense. In WPES, 2014. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Xiang Cai, Rishab Nithyanand, Tao Wang, Rob Johnson, and Ian Goldberg. A systematic approach to developing and evaluating website fingerprinting defenses. In ACM CCS, 2014. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Kevin P. Dyer, Scott E. Coull, Thomas Ristenpart, and Thomas Shrimpton. Peek-a-boo, i still see you: Why efficient traffic analysis countermeasures fail. In IEEE Security and Privacy, 2012. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Leonard Kaufman and Peter Rousseeuw. Clustering by means of medoids. Statistical Data Analysis Based on the L1-Norm and Related Methods, 1987.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Gonzalo Navarro. A guided tour to approximate string matching. ACM Comput. Surv., 33:31--88, March 2001. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Charles V. Wright, Scott E. Coull, and Fabian Monrose. Traffic morphing: An efficient defense against statistical traffic analysis. In NDSS, 2009.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Glove: A Bespoke Website Fingerprinting Defense

        Recommendations

        Comments

        Login options

        Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

        Sign in
        • Published in

          cover image ACM Conferences
          WPES '14: Proceedings of the 13th Workshop on Privacy in the Electronic Society
          November 2014
          218 pages
          ISBN:9781450331487
          DOI:10.1145/2665943

          Copyright © 2014 ACM

          Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

          Publisher

          Association for Computing Machinery

          New York, NY, United States

          Publication History

          • Published: 3 November 2014

          Permissions

          Request permissions about this article.

          Request Permissions

          Check for updates

          Qualifiers

          • research-article

          Acceptance Rates

          WPES '14 Paper Acceptance Rate26of67submissions,39%Overall Acceptance Rate106of355submissions,30%

          Upcoming Conference

          CCS '24
          ACM SIGSAC Conference on Computer and Communications Security
          October 14 - 18, 2024
          Salt Lake City , UT , USA

        PDF Format

        View or Download as a PDF file.

        PDF

        eReader

        View online with eReader.

        eReader