The network of teaching excellence in computer science and master teachers

ABSTRACT

The current focus on computer science in the school curriculum in many countries has led to concerns about how teachers will manage this change and rise to the challenge of the new curriculum. In-service teachers have a need for professional development in computer science, both to develop their subject knowledge and their pedagogical skills.

Computing at School (CAS) has established a professional development programme called the Network of Teaching Excellence in Computer Science (NoE) to support the Computing curriculum changes in England. This programme use a model of training "Master Teachers", who are teachers with expertise in computer science as well as skills to impart this to other teachers; this model focuses on local, face-to-face, peer-to-peer delivery. Master Teachers run professional development sessions in their own schools at low cost, and offer support to their local community of teachers. The vision is that any teacher who needs to develop their skills in computer science has access to a particular individual with expertise who can support them. This paper describes the impact of the first full year of this programme on the computer science subject knowledge of teachers who have worked with Master Teachers.

References

1. P. Bradshaw and J. Woollard. Computing At School: an emergent community of practice for a re-emergent subject. In Proceedings of the International Conference on ICT in Education, 2012.
2. N. C. C. Brown, M. Kolling, T. Crick, S. Peyton-Jones, S. Humphreys, and S. Sentance. Bringing Computer Science back into Schools: Lessons from the UK. In Proceedings of the 44th ACM Technical Symposium on Computer science education, SIGCSE '13. ACM, 2013.
3. N. C. C. Brown, S. Sentance, T. Crick, and S. Humphreys. Restart: The Resurgence of Computer Science in UK Schools. ACM Transactions of Computing Education, 14(2), Jun 2014.
4. S. Cooper, S. Grover, and B. Simon. Building a Virtual Community of Practice for K-12 CS Teachers. Commun. ACM, 57(5):39--41, May 2014.
5. CSTA. Running on Empty. Technical report, 2010.
6. J. Cuny. Transforming high school computing: A call to action. ACM Inroads, 3(2):32--36, June 2012.
7. CUREE. Understanding what enables high-quality professional learning. Technical report, 2013.
8. B. Ericson, M. Guzdial, and M. Biggers. A Model for Improving Secondary CS Education. SIGCSE Bull., 37(1):332--336, Feb. 2005.
9. S. Fincher and J. Tenenberg. Warren's question. In Proceedings of the Third International Workshop on Computing Education Research, ICER '07, pages 51--60, New York, NY, USA, 2007. ACM.
10. J. Goode. If you build teachers, will students come? the role of teachers in broadening computer science learning for urban youth. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 36(1):65--88, 2007.
11. T. R. Guskey and K. S. Yoon. What works in Professional Development? The Leading Edge, 2009.
12. T. R. Gusky. Evaluating Professional Change. Corwin Press, 2000.
13. O. Hazzan, J. Gal-Ezer, and L. Blum. A model for High School Computer Sscience Education: the four key elements that make it! In Proceedings of the 39th SIGCSE technical symposium on Computer science education, pages 281--285. ACM, 2008. ID: 84.
14. A. Kennedy. Models of continuing professional development: a framework for analysis. Journal of In-Service Education, 31(2):235--250, 2005.
15. K. Lipowski, D. Jorde, M. Prenzel, and T. Seidel. Expert views on the implementation of teacher professional development in European countries. Professional Development in Education, 37(5):685--700, 11/01; 2012/06 2011.
16. P. Mayring. Qualitative content analysis. Forum of Qualitative Social Research, 1(2), Jun 2000.
17. B. B. Morrison, L. Ni, and M. Guzdial. Adapting the disciplinary commons model for high school teachers: Improving recruitment, creating community. In Proceedings of the Ninth Annual International Conference on International Computing Education Research, ICER '12, pages 47--54, New York, NY, USA, 2012. ACM.
18. V. D. Opfer and D. Pedder. The lost promise of teacher professional development in England. European Journal of Teacher Education, 34(1):3--24, 2011.
19. C. Schulte, M. Hornung, S. Sentance, V. Dagiene, T. Jevsikova, N. Thota, A. Eckerdal, and A.-K. Peters. Computer science at school/cs teacher education: Koli working-group report on cs at school. In Proceedings of the 12th Koli Calling International Conference on Computing Education Research, Koli Calling '12, pages 29--38, New York, NY, USA, 2012. ACM.
20. S. Sentance, M. Dorling, and A. McNicol. Computer science in secondary schools in the uk: Ways to empower teachers. In Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Informatics in Schools: Situation, Evolution, and Perspectives, ISSEP'13, pages 15--30, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2013. Springer-Verlag.
21. C. Silver and A. Lewins. QDA Miner 3.2 (with WordStat and Simstat) Distinguishing features and functions. 2010.
22. J. Tenenberg and S. Fincher. Opening the door of the computer science classroom: The disciplinary commons. SIGCSE Bull., 39(1):514--518, Mar. 2007.
23. The Royal Society. Shut Down or Restart? The way forward for Computing in UK Schools. Technical Report January 2012, DES 2448, 2012.
24. D. Thompson and T. Bell. Adoption of new Computer Science High School Standards by New Zealand teachers. In Proceedings of the 44th SIGCSE technical symposium on Computer science education, SIGCSE '13. ACM, 2013.
25. E. Wenger. Communities of Practice and Learning Systems. Organization, 7(2):225--246, 2000.

Index Terms

• Social and professional topics

  • Professional topics

    • Computing education

      • Computing education programs

        • Computer science education