skip to main content
10.1145/2675133.2675156acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagescscwConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Illegitimate Civic Participation: Supporting Community Activists on the Ground

Published: 28 February 2015 Publication History

Abstract

In this paper we examine the way Information and Communications Technologies (ICTs) support forms of community activism that operate outside formal political and institutional channels. We have done fieldwork with local housing justice activists in order to gain insight into the way ICTs play a role in complementing forms of civic engagement that challenge, rather than work with, institutional authority. We argue that ICTs are instrumental in supporting and shaping three alternate information practices' situating, codification, and scaffolding? that each serve the goals of direct democratic engagement. We also show how local activist communities engage in these three practices through their varied use of ICTs, including the ways they provide mechanisms for informal but politically significant? and legitimate? civic engagement.

References

[1]
Agosto, D. and Abbas, J. High school seniors' social network and other ICT use preferences and concerns. Proc. ASIS&T '10, (2010), Article No. 65.
[2]
Asad, M., Fox, S., & Le Dantec, C.A. Speculative Activist Technologies. Proc. iConference, (2014), 229--243.
[3]
Becker, T. Rating the Impact of New Technologies on Democracy. Commun. ACM 44, 1 (2001), 39--43.
[4]
Best, M.L., Jones, K., Kondo, I., Thakur, D., Wornyo, E., and Yu, C. Post-conflict communications: The case of Liberia. Commun. ACM 50, 10 (2007), 33--39.
[5]
Best, M. and Kumar, R. Sustainability failures of rural telecenters: Challenges from the sustainable access in rural india (sari) project. In Information Technologies and International Development. ACM, (2008), 31--45.
[6]
Björgvinsson, E., Ehn, P., Hillgren, P.A. Participatory design and "democratizing innovation." Proc. PDC. (2010), 41--50.
[7]
Caldeira, F., Monteiro, E., and Simões, P. Trust and reputation for information exchange in critical infrastructures. Proc. CRITIS '10, ACM, (2010), 140--152.
[8]
Carlisle, P. Transferring, Translating and Transforming: An Integrative Relational Approach to Sharing and Assessing Knowledge across Boundaries. Proc. CRITO. (2004).
[9]
Cohen, Joshua. "Deliberation and democratic legitimacy." Debates in Contemporary Political Philoso-phy (1989): 342--360.
[10]
Dimond, J., Dye, M., Larose, D., and Bruckman, A. Hollaback!: the role of storytelling online in a social movement organization. Proc. CSCW, (2013), 477--490.
[11]
DiSalvo, C., Light, A., Hirsch, T., Le Dantec, C., Goodman, E. and Hill, K. HCI, communities, and politics. In CHI EA '10. ACM, (2010), 3151--3154.
[12]
DiSalvo, C., Nourbakhsh, I., Holstius, D., Akin, A. and Louw, M. The Neighborhood Networks Project: A Case Study of Critical Engagement and Creative Expression Through Participatory Design. Proc. PDC. ACM, (2008), 1975--1984.
[13]
Dombrowski, L., Voida, A., Hayes, G.R. and Mazmanian, M. The labor practices of service mediation: a study of the work practices of food assistance out-reach. Proc CHI. ACM, (2012), 1977--1986.
[14]
Dourish, P. Implications for design. Proc. CHI. ACM, (2006), 541--550.
[15]
Dowling, J. and Pfeffer, J. Organizational Legitimacy: Social Values and Organizational Behavior. In The Pacific Sociological Review. 18, 1 (Jan 1975), 122--136.
[16]
Evans-Cowley, J. Planning in the age of Facebook: the role of social networking in planning processes. GeoJournal. 75, (2010), 407--420.
[17]
Evans-Cowley, J. Planning in the Real-Time City: The Future of Mobile Technology. Journal of Planning Literature. 25, 2 (Nov. 2010), 136--149.
[18]
Fiorino, D. Citizen participation and environmental risk: A survey of institutional mechanisms. Science, Technology, and Human Values. 15. (1990), 226--243.
[19]
Fox, S. and Le Dantec, C.A. Community Historians: Scaffolding Community Engagement through Culture and Heritage. Proc. DIS. ACM, (2014), 785--794.
[20]
Friedman, B., Borning, A., Davis, J.L., et al. Laying the Foundations for Public Participation and Value Advocacy: Interaction Design for a Large Scale Urban Simulation. Proc. dg.o. ACM, (2008), 305--314.
[21]
Gaver, W., Beaver, J., and Benford, S. Ambiguity as a resource for design. Proc. CHI. ACM, (2003), 233--240.
[22]
Goecks, J., Voida, A., Voida, S. and Mynatt, E.D. Charitable Technologies: Opportunities for Collaborative Computing in Nonprofit Fundraising. Proc. CSCW. ACM, (2008), 689--698.
[23]
Ghassan, A. and Blythe, M. On legitimacy: designer as minor scientist. In CHI EA '13. ACM, (2013), 2149--2158.
[24]
Goldweber, M., Little, J.C., Cross, G., Davoli, R., Riedesel, C., von Konsky, B.R., and Walker, H. Enhancing the Social Issues Components in our Computing Curriculum: Computing for the Social Good. Proc. ITiCSE-WGR. ACM, (2010), 117--133.
[25]
Gordon, E. and Schirra, S. Playing With Empathy: Digital Role-Playing Games in Public Meetings. Proc. C&T. ACM, (2011), 179--185.
[26]
Gordon, E., Schirra, S. and Hollander, J. Immersive planning: a conceptual model for designing public participation with new technologies. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design. 38, (2011), 509--519
[27]
Habermas, J. The Structural Transformation of the Public Sphere: An Inquiry into a Category of Bourgeois Society. The MIT Press, 1991.
[28]
Håkansson, M. and Sengers, P. Beyond being green: simple living families and ICT. Proc. CHI. ACM, (2013), 2725--2734.
[29]
Hirsch, T. 2009. Learning from activists: lessons for designers. interactions 16, 3 (2009).
[30]
Laird, F. Participatory Analysis, Democracy, and Technological Decision Making. Science, Technology & Human Values. 18, 3. (1993), 341--361.
[31]
Le Dantec, C.A. Legitimacy at the Outskirts: Categories, Use, and Adoption in Marginal Communities. Proc. UbiComp. ACM, (2009), 341--361.
[32]
Le Dantec, C.A., Farrell, R.G., Christensen, J.E., Bailey, M., Ellis, J.B., Kellogg, W.A. and Edwards, W.K. Publics in Practice: Ubiquitous Computing at a Shelter for Homeless Mothers. Proc. CHI. ACM, (2011), 1687--1696.
[33]
Le Dantec, C.A. and Edwards, W.K. Across Boundaries of Influence and Accountability: The Multiple Scales of Public Sector Information Systems. Proc. CHI. ACM, (2010), 113--122.
[34]
Le Dantec, C.A. and Edwards, W.K. The View from the Trenches: Organization, Power, and Technology at Two Nonprofit Homeless Outreach Centers. Proc. CSCW. ACM, (2008), 589--598.
[35]
Le Dantec, C.A., Christensen, J.E., Bailey, M., Farrell, R.G., Ellis, J.B., Danis, C.M., Kellogg, W.A., Edwards, W.K. A tale of two publics: democratizing design at the margins. Proc. DIS. ACM, (2010), 11--20.
[36]
Marsden, G. Designing Technology for the Developing World. interactions 13, 2 (2006).
[37]
Marsden, G., Maunder, A. and Parker, M. People Are People, but Technology is Not Technology. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society. 366, (Jul. 2008), 3795--3804.
[38]
McMillan, D.W. and Chavis, D.M. Sense of community: A definition and theory. Journal of Community Psychology. 14, (1986).
[39]
McPhail, B., Costantino, T., Bruckmann, D., Barclay, R. and Clement, A. Caveat Exemplar: Participatory Design in a Non-Profit Volunteer Organisation. Proc. CSCW. ACM, (1998), 223--241.
[40]
Merkel, C., Farooq, U., Xiao, L., Ganoe, C., Rosson, M.B. and Carroll, J.M. Managing Technology Use and Learning in Nonprofit Community Organizations: Methodological Challenges and Opportunities. Proc. CHIMIT. ACM, (2007), Article No. 8.
[41]
Merkel, C.B., Xiao, L., Farooq, U., Ganoe, C.H., Lee, R., Carroll, J.M. and Rosson, M.B. Participatory Design in Community Computing Contexts: Tales from the Field. Proc. PDC. ACM, (2004), 1--10.
[42]
Mouffe, C. The Democratic Paradox. Verso, London, UK, 2005.
[43]
Saward, M. Less than meets the eye: democratic legitimacy and deliberative theory. Democratic Innovation. M. Saward, ed. Routledge, 2000, 66--77.
[44]
Silver-Greenberg, J. and Protess, B. "JPMorgan Reveals It Faces Criminal and Civil Inquiries." In The New York Times. (August 2013). Web. http://dealbook.nytimes.com/2013/08/07/jpmorgan-reveals-it-faces-civil-and-criminal-inquiries/?ref=business&_r=0&module=ArrowsNav&contentCollection=Business%20Day&action=keypress®ion=FixedLeft&pgtype=Blogs
[45]
Snellen, I. ICTs, Bureaucracies, and the Future of Democracy. Commun. ACM. 44, 1 (2001), 45--48.
[46]
Turner, F. From Counterculture to Cyberculture: Stewart Brand, the Whole Earth Network, and the Rise of Digital Utopianism. University Of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL, 2006.
[47]
van Dijk, J. Models of Democracy and Concepts of Communication. Digital Democracy: Issues of Theo-ry and Practice. K.L. Hacker and J. van Dijk, eds. SAGE Publications Ltd, 2000, 30--53.
[48]
York, D. and Zhengzin, X. Sharing the knowledge. Proc. CHI. ACM, (2011), 1007--1012.

Cited By

View all
  • (2025)What Knowledge Do We Produce from Social Media Data and How?Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction10.1145/37012169:1(1-45)Online publication date: 10-Jan-2025
  • (2024)The Denizen Designer Project: Practices, Relationships, and Principles of Activist-Led DesignProceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction10.1145/36868978:CSCW2(1-32)Online publication date: 8-Nov-2024
  • (2024)Doing What Counts: Following Eviction Data from the Community to the CourtCompanion Publication of the 2024 ACM Designing Interactive Systems Conference10.1145/3656156.3665128(15-18)Online publication date: 1-Jul-2024
  • Show More Cited By

Index Terms

  1. Illegitimate Civic Participation: Supporting Community Activists on the Ground

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Information & Contributors

    Information

    Published In

    cover image ACM Conferences
    CSCW '15: Proceedings of the 18th ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work & Social Computing
    February 2015
    1956 pages
    ISBN:9781450329224
    DOI:10.1145/2675133
    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

    Sponsors

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    Published: 28 February 2015

    Permissions

    Request permissions for this article.

    Check for updates

    Author Tags

    1. civic engagement
    2. community computing
    3. public participation

    Qualifiers

    • Research-article

    Conference

    CSCW '15
    Sponsor:

    Acceptance Rates

    CSCW '15 Paper Acceptance Rate 161 of 575 submissions, 28%;
    Overall Acceptance Rate 2,235 of 8,521 submissions, 26%

    Upcoming Conference

    CSCW '25

    Contributors

    Other Metrics

    Bibliometrics & Citations

    Bibliometrics

    Article Metrics

    • Downloads (Last 12 months)125
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)15
    Reflects downloads up to 09 Mar 2025

    Other Metrics

    Citations

    Cited By

    View all
    • (2025)What Knowledge Do We Produce from Social Media Data and How?Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction10.1145/37012169:1(1-45)Online publication date: 10-Jan-2025
    • (2024)The Denizen Designer Project: Practices, Relationships, and Principles of Activist-Led DesignProceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction10.1145/36868978:CSCW2(1-32)Online publication date: 8-Nov-2024
    • (2024)Doing What Counts: Following Eviction Data from the Community to the CourtCompanion Publication of the 2024 ACM Designing Interactive Systems Conference10.1145/3656156.3665128(15-18)Online publication date: 1-Jul-2024
    • (2024)Counting Up: Designing Agonistic Data Collection in the Court RoomProceedings of the 2024 ACM Designing Interactive Systems Conference10.1145/3643834.3661616(3257-3271)Online publication date: 1-Jul-2024
    • (2024)Resistive Threads: Electronic Streetwear as Social Movement MaterialProceedings of the 2024 ACM Designing Interactive Systems Conference10.1145/3643834.3661537(69-85)Online publication date: 1-Jul-2024
    • (2024)Enhancing Reentry Support Programs Through Digital Literacy IntegrationProceedings of the 2024 ACM Designing Interactive Systems Conference10.1145/3643834.3660730(2882-2896)Online publication date: 1-Jul-2024
    • (2024)Configurations of Digital Participatory BudgetingACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction10.1145/363514431:2(1-28)Online publication date: 5-Feb-2024
    • (2024)What's the Rush?: Alternative Values in Navigation Technologies for Urban PlacemakingProceedings of the 2024 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3613904.3642470(1-17)Online publication date: 11-May-2024
    • (2024)Situating Datasets: Making Public Eviction Data Actionable for Housing JusticeProceedings of the 2024 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3613904.3642452(1-16)Online publication date: 11-May-2024
    • (2024)A Game of Love for Women: Social Support in Otome Game Mr. Love: Queen’s Choice in ChinaProceedings of the 2024 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3613904.3642306(1-15)Online publication date: 11-May-2024
    • Show More Cited By

    View Options

    Login options

    View options

    PDF

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    Figures

    Tables

    Media

    Share

    Share

    Share this Publication link

    Share on social media