skip to main content
10.1145/2675133.2675212acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagescscwConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Planning with Crowdsourced Data: Rhetoric and Representation in Transportation Planning

Published: 28 February 2015 Publication History

Abstract

We are in the midst of a new era of experimentation that blends social and mobile computing in support of digital democracy. These experiments will have potentially long lasting consequences on how the public is invited to partic-ipate in governance by elected as well as professional offi-cials. In this paper, we look at how data from a purpose-built smartphone app we deployed were incorporated into a three-day urban planning event. The data collected were meant to help inform design decisions for new cycling in-frastructure and to provide an alternate means for partici-pating in the planning process. Through our analysis, we point to three distinct roles the data played at the event-as authority, as evidence, and as ambivalent. Each role demonstrates the challenge and potential for turning to crowdsourced data as a form of participation and as a re-source for urban planning.

References

[1]
Becker, T. Rating the impact of new technologies on democracy. Communications of the ACM 44, 1 (2001), 39--43.
[2]
Bella, T. Cory Booker's Twitter Talk at SXSW Shows He's Really an Old-School Pol. The Atlantic, 2013. http://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2013/03/cory-bookers-twitter-talk-at-sxsw-shows-hes-really-an-old-school-pol/273914/.
[3]
Bernard, H.R. Research Methods in Anthropology: Qualitative and Quantitative Approaches. AltaMira Press, 2005.
[4]
Brown, M. "Street Bump" Android app detects and reports potholes. Wired.co.uk, 2011. http://www.wired.co.uk/news/archive/2011-02/14/street-bump-app.
[5]
Callon, M., Lascoumes, P., and Barthe, Y. Acting in an Uncertain World: An Essay on Technical Democracy. MIT Press, 2009.
[6]
Center for Information and Research on Civic Learn-ing and Engagement. The Youth Vote 2004 With a Historical Look at Youth Voting Patterns, 1972--2004. 2005.
[7]
Dawes, S.S. and Pardo, T.A. Maximizing Knowledge for Program Evaluation: Critical Issues and Practical Challenges of ICT Strategies. 4084/2006, (2006), 58--69.
[8]
Dill, J. and McNeil, N. Four Types of Cyclists' Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board 2387, -1 (2014), 129--138.
[9]
DiSalvo, C.F. Adversarial Design. The MIT Press, 2012.
[10]
Doran, D., Gokhale, S., and Dagnino, A. Human Sens-ing for Smart Cities. Proceedings of the 2013 IEEE/ACM International Conference on Advances in Social Networks Analysis and Mining, ACM (2013), 1323--1330.
[11]
Erickson, T., Podlaseck, M., Sahu, S., Dai, J.D., Chao, T., and Naphade, M. The Dubuque Water Portal: Eval-uation of the Uptake, Use and Impact of Residential Water Consumption Feedback. Proc. CHI, ACM (2012), 675--684.
[12]
Evans-Cowley, J. Planning in the Real-Time City: The Future of Mobile Technology. Journal of Planning Literature 25, 2 (2010), 136--149.
[13]
Evans-Cowley, J. Planning in the age of Facebook: the role of social networking in planning processes. GeoJournal 75, (2010), 407--420.
[14]
Fallis, D. Social Epistemology and the Digital Divide. Computing and Philosophy Conference, Australian Computer Society (2004), 79--84.
[15]
Fiorino, D.J. Citizen Participation and Environmental Risk: A Survey of Institutional Mechanisms. Science, Technology & Human Values 15, 2 (1990), 226--243.
[16]
Galston, W.A. Civic education and political participa-tion. Phi Kappa Phi Forum, (2004).
[17]
Gil-Garcia, J.R., Pardo, T.A., and Aldama-Nalda, A. Smart Cities and Smart Governments: Using Infor-mation Technologies to Address Urban Challenges. Proc. Digital Gov. Research, ACM (2013), 296--297.
[18]
Gilbert, J. Common Ground. Pluto Press, 2013.
[19]
Goodchild, M.F. Citizens as sensors: the world of vol-unteered geography. GeoJournal 69, 4 (2007), 211.
[20]
Gordon, E. and Schirra, S. Playing With Empathy: Digital Role-Playing Games in Public Meetings. Com-munity Mental Health Journal, (2011).
[21]
Gordon, E., Schirra, S., and Hollander, J. Immersive planning: a conceptual model for designing public participation with new technologies. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design 38, (2011), 509--519.
[22]
Granovetter, M.S. The Strength of Weak Ties. 78, 6 (1973), 1360--1380.
[23]
Habermas, J. The Structural Transformation of the Public Sphere: An Inquiry into a Category of Bourgeois Society. MIT Press, 1991.
[24]
Ho, S. and Rajabifard, A. Learning From The Crowd: The Role of Volunteered Geographic Information in Realising a Spatially Enabled Society. Proc. Realising Spatially Enabled Societies, (2010).
[25]
Kling, R. Automated information systems as social resources in policy making. ACM '78: Proceedings of the 1978 annual conference, ACM (1978), 666--674.
[26]
Kuznetsov, S. and Paulos, E. Participatory sensing in public spaces: activating urban surfaces with sensor probes. Proc. DIS, ACM Request Permissions (2010).
[27]
Kvasny, L. and Keil, M. The Challenges of Redressing the Digital Divide: A Tale of Two Us Cities. Infor-mation Systems Journal 16, 1 (2006), 23--53.
[28]
Laird, F.N. Participatory Analysis, Democracy, and Technological Decision Making. Science, Technology & Human Values 18, 3 (1993).
[29]
Latour, B. and Weibel, P. Making Things Public: At-mospheres of Democracy. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 2005.
[30]
Le Dantec, C.A. and DiSalvo, C.F. Infrastructuring and the Formation of Publics in Participatory Design. Social Studies of Science 43, 2 (2013), 241--264.
[31]
McKenzie, H. Cory Booker calls for tech-empowered open democracy. 2013. http://pando.com/2013/03/10/cory-booker-calls-for-tech-empowered-open-democracy/.
[32]
Meyer, M.D. and Miller, E.J. Urban Transportation Planning: A Decision-Oriented Approach. McGraw-Hill Higher Education, 2001.
[33]
Miles, M.B. and Huberman, A.M. Qualitative Data Analysis: An Expanded Sourcebook. Sage, 1994.
[34]
Mouffe, C. The Democratic Paradox. Verso, London, UK, 2005.
[35]
Nam, T. and Pardo, T.A. Smart City As Urban Innova-tion: Focusing on Management, Policy, and Context. Proc. Theory and Practice of E-Governance, ACM (2011), 185--194.
[36]
Nam, T. and Pardo, T.A. Conceptualizing Smart City with Dimensions of Technology, People, and Institu-tions. Proc. Dig. Gov., ACM (2011), 282--291.
[37]
Nam, T. and Pardo, T.A. Transforming City Govern-ment: A Case Study of Philly311. Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Theory and Practice of Electronic Governance, ACM (2012), 310--319.
[38]
National Association of City Transportation Officials. Urban Bikeway Design Guide, Second Edition. Na-tional Assoc of City Trans Officials, 2012.
[39]
New York Department of Transportation. Measuring the Street: New Metrics for the 21st Century Streets. NYDOT, 2012.
[40]
Olivares, T., Royo, F., and Ortiz, A.M. An Experimental Testbed for Smart Cities Applications. Proc. Mobility Management and Wireless Access, ACM (2013), 115--118.
[41]
Pew Center Research Center for the People & the Press. Cable and Internet loom large in fragmented political news universe. Pew Internet and American Life Project, 2004.
[42]
Pierce, J. and Paulos, E. Beyond Energy Monitors: Interaction, Energy, and Emerging Energy Systems. Proc. CHI, ACM (2012), 665--674.
[43]
President's Council of Advisors on Science and Tech-nology. Designing a Digital Future: Federally Funded Research and Development in Networking and Infor-mation Technology. (2010).
[44]
Priedhorsky, R., Masli, M., and Terveen, L. Eliciting and focusing geographic volunteer work. Proc. CSCW, ACM Request Permissions (2010), 61--70.
[45]
Roitman, H., Mamou, J., Mehta, S., Satt, A., and Subramaniam, L.V. Harnessing the Crowds for Smart City Sensing. Proc. Multimodal Crowd Sensing, ACM (2012), 17--18.
[46]
Sackman, H. A public philosophy for real time information systems. AFIPS '68 (Fall, part II): Proceedings of the December 9--11, 1968, fall joint computer conference, part II, ACM (1968), 1491--1498.
[47]
Shilton, K. Participatory Sensing: Building Empower-ing Surveillance. Surveillance & Society 8, 2 (2010), 131--150.
[48]
Skocpol, T. and Fiorina, M.P. Civic Engagement in American Democracy. Brookings Institution Press, Washington D.C., 1999.
[49]
Slee, T. Seeing Like a Geek. http://crookedtimber.org/2012/06/25/seeing-like-a-geek/.
[50]
Snellen, I. ICTs, bureaucracies, and the future of de-mocracy. Communications of the ACM 44, 1 (2001), 45--48.
[51]
Strauss, A. and Corbin, J. Basics of Qualitative Re-search: Techniques and Procedures for Developing Grounded Theory. Sage, 1998.
[52]
Vakali, A., Anthopoulos, L., and Krco, S. Smart Cities Data Streams Integration: Experimenting with Internet of Things and Social Data Flows. Proc. WIMS, ACM (2014), 60:1--60:5.
[53]
van Dijk, J. Models of Democracy and Concepts of Communication. In K.L. Hacker and J. van Dijk, eds., Digital Democracy: Issues of Theory and Practice. SAGE Publications Ltd, 2000, 30--53.
[54]
Weiss, J.A., Gruber, J.E., and Carver, R.H. Reflections on Value: Policy Makers Evaluate Federal Information Systems. Public Administration Review 46, 6 (1986), 497--505.

Cited By

View all
  • (2025)Urban Planning Through Participatory Democracy: Analysis of Citizen Participation in Urban Planning in Ho (Ghana) and Kpalimé (Togo)Sustainability10.3390/su1703116117:3(1161)Online publication date: 31-Jan-2025
  • (2025)What Knowledge Do We Produce from Social Media Data and How?Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction10.1145/37012169:1(1-45)Online publication date: 10-Jan-2025
  • (2024)The Contribution of Intelligent Systems (IS) on Transport and Planning StudiesInterdisciplinary Approaches to Transportation and Urban Planning10.4018/979-8-3693-6695-0.ch004(83-120)Online publication date: 8-Nov-2024
  • Show More Cited By

Index Terms

  1. Planning with Crowdsourced Data: Rhetoric and Representation in Transportation Planning

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Information & Contributors

    Information

    Published In

    cover image ACM Conferences
    CSCW '15: Proceedings of the 18th ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work & Social Computing
    February 2015
    1956 pages
    ISBN:9781450329224
    DOI:10.1145/2675133
    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

    Sponsors

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    Published: 28 February 2015

    Permissions

    Request permissions for this article.

    Check for updates

    Author Tags

    1. digital democracy
    2. public participation
    3. urban informatics
    4. urban planning

    Qualifiers

    • Research-article

    Conference

    CSCW '15
    Sponsor:

    Acceptance Rates

    CSCW '15 Paper Acceptance Rate 161 of 575 submissions, 28%;
    Overall Acceptance Rate 2,235 of 8,521 submissions, 26%

    Upcoming Conference

    CSCW '25

    Contributors

    Other Metrics

    Bibliometrics & Citations

    Bibliometrics

    Article Metrics

    • Downloads (Last 12 months)46
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)5
    Reflects downloads up to 09 Mar 2025

    Other Metrics

    Citations

    Cited By

    View all
    • (2025)Urban Planning Through Participatory Democracy: Analysis of Citizen Participation in Urban Planning in Ho (Ghana) and Kpalimé (Togo)Sustainability10.3390/su1703116117:3(1161)Online publication date: 31-Jan-2025
    • (2025)What Knowledge Do We Produce from Social Media Data and How?Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction10.1145/37012169:1(1-45)Online publication date: 10-Jan-2025
    • (2024)The Contribution of Intelligent Systems (IS) on Transport and Planning StudiesInterdisciplinary Approaches to Transportation and Urban Planning10.4018/979-8-3693-6695-0.ch004(83-120)Online publication date: 8-Nov-2024
    • (2024)Crowdsourcing Geospatial Data for Earth and Human Observations: A ReviewJournal of Remote Sensing10.34133/remotesensing.01054Online publication date: 22-Jan-2024
    • (2024)When design workshops meet chatbots: Meaningful participation at scale?International Journal of Architectural Computing10.1177/14780771241253440Online publication date: 30-May-2024
    • (2024)Designing for Dissensus: Socially Engaged Art to access experience and support participation.Proceedings of the 2024 ACM Designing Interactive Systems Conference10.1145/3643834.3661516(2851-2865)Online publication date: 1-Jul-2024
    • (2024)Moving Towards Mobility Justice: Challenges and Considerations for Supporting AdvocacyProceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction10.1145/36373738:CSCW1(1-22)Online publication date: 26-Apr-2024
    • (2024)Configurations of Digital Participatory BudgetingACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction10.1145/363514431:2(1-28)Online publication date: 5-Feb-2024
    • (2024)Bitacora: A Toolkit for Supporting NonProfits to Critically Reflect on Social Media Data UseProceedings of the 2024 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3613904.3642673(1-29)Online publication date: 11-May-2024
    • (2024)Leveraging Crowdsourced Activity Information for Transit Stations Flow EstimationIEEE Access10.1109/ACCESS.2024.349401212(167518-167529)Online publication date: 2024
    • Show More Cited By

    View Options

    Login options

    View options

    PDF

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    Figures

    Tables

    Media

    Share

    Share

    Share this Publication link

    Share on social media