skip to main content
10.1145/267734.267810acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesspmConference Proceedingsconference-collections
Article
Free Access

Assessing the feasibility of a process plan: a study in variable interaction

Authors Info & Claims
Published:01 May 1997Publication History
First page image

References

  1. 1.L. Alting and H. Zhang. Computer aided process planning: The state-of-the-art survey. International Journal of Production Research, 27(4):553- 585, 1989.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. 2.D. C. Anderson and T. C. Chang. Geometric reasoning in feature-based design and process planning. Computers ~ Graphics, 14(2):225-235, 1990.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.S. L. Brooks and M. L. Wolf. Overview of Allied Signal's XCUT system. In J. J. Shah, M. Mantyla, and D. Nau, editors, Advances in Feature Ba~ed Manufacturing. Elsevier/North Holland, 1994.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. 4.D. R. Brown, M. R. Cutkosky, and J. M. Tenenbaum. Next-Cut: A computational framework for concurrent engineering. In Second International Symposium on Concurrent Engineering, Morgantown, West Virginia, February 7-9 1990.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.N. G. Bruyevich and B. Y. Chelishchev. Problems of automation of technological planning. I. Formal description of technological planning. Engineering Cybernetics, 12(5):154-162, 1974.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.T. C. Chang. Expert Process Planning for Manufacturing. Addison-Wesley, 1990.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.T. H. Cormen, C. E. Leiserson, and R. L. Rivest. Introduction to Algorithms. The MIT Press, 1990. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. 8.Y. Descotte and J.-C. Latombe. Making compromises among antagonist constraints in a planner. Artificial Intelligence, 27:183-217, 1985. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. 9.G. Eshel, M. Barash, and T. C. Chang. Generate & test and rectify--a plan synthesis tactic for automatic process planning. International Yournal for Artificial Intelligence in Engineering, 3(1):18-31, 1988.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. 10.M. R. Garey and D. S. Johnson. Computers and Intractability. Bell Laboratories, 1979.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.A. R. Grayer. The automatic production of machined components starting from a stored geometric description. In D. McPherson, editor, Advances in Computer-Aided Manufacture, pages 137-151. North-Holland, 1977.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.P. Gu and Y. Zhang. OOPPS: An object-oriented process planning system. Computers ~ Industrial Engineering, 26(4):709-731, 1994. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. 13.S. K. Gupta and D. S. Nau. A systematic approach for analysing the manufacturability of machined parts. Computer Aided Design, 27(5):323- 342, 1994.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  14. 14.I. Ham and S. C.-Y. Lu. Computer-aided process planning: The present and the future. Annals of CIRP, 37(2):591-601, 1988.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  15. 15.M. R. Henderson and G.-J. Chang. FRAPP: Automated feature recognition and process planning from solid model data. In Computers in Engineering, 1988, pages 529-536, San Francisco, CA, July 31-August 4, 1988. ASME.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.M. Inui and F. Kimura. Using a truth-maintenance system to assist product-model construction for design and process planning. Computer Aided Design, 25(1):59-70, 199 .Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  17. 17.K. Iwata and N. Sugimura. An integrated CAD/CAPP system with "know-hows" on machining accuracies of parts. Journal of Engineering for Industry, 109:128-133, 1987.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  18. 18.S. Kambhampati, M. R. Cutkosky, J. M. Tenenbaum, and S. H. Lee. Integrating general purpose planners and specialized reasoners: Case study of a hybrid planning architecture. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, 23(6):1503- 1518, 1993.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  19. 19.R. Karinthi, D. S. Nau, and Q. Yang. Handling feature interactions in process planning. Applied Artificial Intelligence, 6(4):389-415, 1992. Special issue on AI for manufacturing. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. 20.M. Marefat and R. L. Kashyap. Automatic construction of process plans from solid model representations. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, 22(5):1097-1115, 1992.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  21. 21.P. G. Maropoulos. Review of research in tooling technology, process modelling and process planning: Part ii: Process planning. Computer Integrated Manufacturing Systems, 8(1):13-20, 1995.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  22. 22.K. Matsushima, N. Okada, and T. Sata. The integration of CAD and CAM by application of artificial-intelligence techniques. Annals of CIRP, 31 (1):329-332, 1982.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  23. 23.F. G. Mill, J. C. Salmon, and A. G. Pedley. Representation problems in feature-based approaches to design and process planning. International Journal of Computer Integrated Manufacturing, 6(1&2):27- 33, 1993.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.T. Ochiai and D. A. Hoeltzel. A non-linear machining process planner for concurrent mechanical design. In B. J. Gilmore, D. A. Hoeltzel, S. Azarm, and H. A. Eschenauer, editors, Advances in Design Automation, volume DE 65-2, pages 545-552. ASME, 1993. Presented at the 1993 ASME Design Technical Conferences, Albuquerque, NM, September 19-22, 1993.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.K. Preiss and E. Kaplanski. Automatic mill routing from solid geometry information. In E. A. Warman, editor, Computer Applications in Production and Engineering, pages 773-785. North-Holland, 1983.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.H. Sakuri. Automatic setup planning and fixture design for machining. Journal of Manufacturing Systems, 11 (1):30-37, 1992.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  27. 27.J. J. Shah, P. Sreevalsan, and A. Mathew. Survey of CAD/feature-based process planning and NC programming techniques. Computer-Aided Engineering Journal, 8(1):25-33, 1991. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  28. 28.H. Suzuki, H. Ando, and F. Kimura. Geometric constraints and reasoning for geometrical CAD systems. Computers ~ Graphics, 14(2):211-224, 1990.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.M. D. Tsai, S. Takata, M. Inui, F. Kimura, and T. Sata. Operation planning based on cutting process models. Annals of CIRP, 40(1):95-98, 1991.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  30. 30.C. Tsatsoulis and R. L. Kashyap. Case-based reasoning and learning in manufacturing with the TOLTEC planner. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, 23(4):1010-1023, 1993.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  31. 31.F. J. A. M. van Houten. PART: A Computer Aided Process Planning System. PhD thesis, University of Twente, 1991.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.H. B. Voelcker and A. A. G. Requicha. Research in progress: Modelling & planning N C machining processes. In P. K. Wright, editor, Computer-Based Factory Automation: Proceedings of the 11th Conference on Production Research and Technology, pages 11-20. SME, 1984.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.G. Yut. Process Plan Feasibility: Accounting for Interactions Between Planning Decisions. P hD thesis, Purdue University, 1996.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.G. Yut and T. C. Chang. A heuristic grouping algorithm for fixture and tool setups. Engineering Design and Automation, 1(1):21-31, 1995.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.G. Yut and T. C. Chang. Hierarchical operation sequencing using a heuristic grouping algorithm. Manufacturing Systems, 25(3):303-311, 1996.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Assessing the feasibility of a process plan: a study in variable interaction

                Recommendations

                Comments

                Login options

                Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

                Sign in
                • Published in

                  cover image ACM Conferences
                  SMA '97: Proceedings of the fourth ACM symposium on Solid modeling and applications
                  May 1997
                  387 pages
                  ISBN:0897919467
                  DOI:10.1145/267734

                  Copyright © 1997 ACM

                  Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

                  Publisher

                  Association for Computing Machinery

                  New York, NY, United States

                  Publication History

                  • Published: 1 May 1997

                  Permissions

                  Request permissions about this article.

                  Request Permissions

                  Check for updates

                  Qualifiers

                  • Article

                  Acceptance Rates

                  Overall Acceptance Rate86of173submissions,50%
                • Article Metrics

                  • Downloads (Last 12 months)17
                  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)3

                  Other Metrics

                PDF Format

                View or Download as a PDF file.

                PDF

                eReader

                View online with eReader.

                eReader