skip to main content
10.1145/2677758.2677770acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesieConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Flow Theory, Evolution & Creativity: or, 'Fun & Games'

Authors Info & Claims
Published:02 December 2014Publication History

ABSTRACT

In this paper videogames and transmedia are examined from the perspectives of both creation (game design) and audience reception (gameplay experience), in light of the theories of the DPFi (Domain, Person Field interaction) systems model of creativity (Csikszentmihalyi 1988, 1996, 2006, 2014); its herein contended theoretical equivalent, evolutionary epistemology (Popper 1963, DT Campbell 1974, Simonton 2010) and the inherent biocultural evolutionary creative algorithm of selection, variation and transmission-with-heredity; 'flow' theory in creativity (Csikszentmihalyi 1975, 1990, 1996) as a determinant of 'fun factor' in games; 'narrative transportation' theory in fiction (Gerrig 1993, Green & Brock 2000, Van Laer et al 2014) as an additional (necessary but not sufficient) determinant of 'fun-factor' in 'story' videogames; and Boyd's (2009) general theory of creativity in the arts as 'cognitive play with pattern' - ultimately arguing that game play of any kind may potentially enhance animal intelligence, and therefore that videogames as an art form may potentially enhance human intelligence.

References

  1. Boyd, B. 2009. On The Origin Of Stories: Evolution, Cognition, and Fiction, Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Mass. (2009, pp. 13--15)Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Csikszentmihalyi, M. 1975. Beyond Boredom and Anxiety, 1st edn, The Jossey-Bass Behavioral Science series, Jossey-Bass Publishers, San Francisco.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Csikszentmihalyi, M & Massimini, F. 1985. 'On The Psychological Selection Of Bio-Cultural Information', New Ideas in Psychology, vol. 3, no. 2, 115--38.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. Csikszentmihalyi, M. 1990. Flow: The Psychology of Optimal Experience, 1st edn, Harper & Row, New York.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Csikszentmihalyi, M. 1996. Creativity: Flow and the Psychology of Discovery and Invention, 1st edn, HarperCollins, New York. (1996, pp.111--3)Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Popper, KR 1963, Conjectures and Refutations: The Growth of Scientific Knowledge (Essays and Lectures), Routledge & Kegan Paul, London. (see p.29 for Popper's argument that definitions are not important.)Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Campbell, DT 1974, 'Evolutionary Epistemology', in PA Schlipp (ed.), The Philosophy of Karl Popper, La Salle, Illinois, vol. 1, 413--59.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Simonton, DK. 2010. 'Creative Thought as Blind-Variation and Selective-Retention: Combinatorial Models of Exceptional Creativity', Physics of Life Reviews, vol. 7 (June), no. 2, 156--79.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. Csikszentmihalyi, M. 1988. 'Society, Culture, and Person: A Systems View of Creativity', in RJ Sternberg (ed.), The Nature of Creativity, Cambridge University Press, New York, 325--39.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Csikszentmihalyi, M 2014, 'The Systems Model of Creativity and Its Applications', in DK Simonton (ed.), The Wiley Handbook of Genius, John Wiley & Sons Ltd., Chichester, West Sussex, 533--545.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Simonton, DK. 2012. 'Fields, Domains, and Individuals (chapter)', in MD Mumford (ed.), Handbook of Organizational Creativity, Elsevier Science, Oxford, UK, 67--86.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Van Peer, W. 1997. 'Two Laws of Literary Canon: Growth and Predictability in Canon Formation', Mosaic: A Journal for the Interdisciplinary Study of Literature, vol. 30, no. 2, 113--32.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Luhmann, N. 1987. Soziale Systeme: Grundriss einer allgemeinen Theorie, Suhrkamp, Frankfurt.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Dawkins, R. 1976. The Selfish Gene, Oxford University Press, Oxford.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Dennett, DC. 1995. Darwin's Dangerous Idea: Evolution and the Meanings of Life, Simon & Schuster, New York.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Blackmore, SJ 1999, The Meme Machine, Oxford University Press, Oxford.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Blackmore, SJ 2006, 'Memes, Creativity and Consciousness', Aesthetica Magazine, vol. 13 (May, June, July), no. 50.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Blackmore, SJ 2007, 'Memes, Minds and Imagination', SusanBlackmore.co.uk, Oxford University Press, viewed 30th July 2014, <http://www.susanblackmore.co.uk/Chapters/ImaginativeMinds2007.htm>Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Koestler, A 1964, The Act of Creation, Hutchinson, London.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Koestler, A. 1967. The Ghost In The Machine, Hutchinson, London. (see p.48 for the definition of the holon)Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. Koestler, A. 1978. Janus: A Summing Up, Hutchinson, London.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. Feynman, RP. 1972. Photon-hadron Interactions, Frontiers in Physics, W. A. Benjamin, Reading, Mass.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. Feynman, RP {1975} in 2005, Don't You Have Time To Think?, Allen Lane (Penguin), London. (see p. 278 for 'partons')Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. Velikovsky, JT. 2013, 2014. 'The Holon-Parton Structure of the Meme (and, Narreme): A Structure for the Unit of Culture', in StoryAlity, Wordpress.com, Sydney. http://storyality.wordpress.com/2013/12/12/storyality-100-the-holonic-structure-of-the-meme-the-unit-of-culture/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. Csikszentmihalyi, M & Wolfe, R. 2000. 'New Conceptions and Research Approaches to Creativity: Implications for a Systems Perspective of Creativity in Education', in KA Heller, FJ Mönks, R Subotnik & RJ Sternberg (eds), International Handbook of Giftedness and Talent, 2nd ed. edn, Elsevier, Amsterdam; Oxford.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. Laszlo, E. 1972. Introduction to Systems Philosophy: Toward a New Paradigm of Contemporary Thought, Gordon and Breach, New York. For details of the 'evolutionary systems view' in physics, biology and society, see in particular, pp. 88--97, and pp. 176--80 in Laszlo 1972.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. Gerrig, RJ. 1993. Experiencing Narrative Worlds, Yale University Press, New Haven.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  28. Green, MC & Brock, TC. 2000. 'The role of transportation in the persuasiveness of public narratives', Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, vol. 79, 701--21.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  29. Green, MC, Chatham, C & Sestir, MA. 2012. 'Emotion and Transportation into Fact and Fiction', Scientific Study of Literature, vol. 2, no. 1, 37--59Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  30. Van Laer, T, De Ruyter, K, Visconti, LM & Wetzels, M. 2014. 'The Extended Transportation-Imagery Model: A Meta-Analysis of the Antecedents and Consequences of Consumers' Narrative Transportation', Journal Of Consumer Research, vol. 40, 797--817. See p.798 for the quote.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  31. Boyle, EA, Connolly, TM, Hainey, T & Boyle, JM 2012, 'Engagement in Digital Entertainment Games: A Systematic Review', Computers in Human Behavior, vol. 28, pp. 771--80. (for the cited excerpt see Boyle et al 2012, p. 778) Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  32. Sweetser, P., & Wyeth, P. (2005). 'GameFlow: A Model for Evaluating Player Enjoyment in Games', Computers in Entertainment, 3 (3), 1--24. See also p. 10. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  33. Chen, J (2006), 'Flow In Games: Flow Theory', JenovaChen.com, http://www.jenovachen.com/flowingames/flowtheory.htm (accessed 14th August 2014)Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  34. Chen, J. (2007) 'Flow In Games (and Everything Else)', Communications Of The ACM, April 2007, Vol. 50 (4). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  35. Popper, KR. 1999. All Life is Problem Solving, Routledge, London; New York. See p. 3 for science as 'trial and error'.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  36. Maynard Smith, J. 1982. Evolution and the Theory of Games, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge; New York.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  37. Gardner, H. 1983. Frames of Mind: The Theory of Multiple Intelligences, Basic Books, New York.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  38. Gardner, H. 1991. The Unschooled Mind: How children think and how schools should teach, Basic Books Inc., New York.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  39. Smith, M. 2002, 2008. Howard Gardner, Multiple Intelligences and Education, YMCA George Williams College (infed.org), accessed 8th August 2014, http://infed.org/mobi/howard-gardner-multiple-intelligences-and-education/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  40. Cosmides, L, Tooby, J. 1997. 'The Multimodular Nature of Human Intelligence', in A Schiebel & JW Schopf (eds.), Origin and Evolution of Intelligence, Center for the Study of the Evolution and Origin of Life, UCLA, Los Angeles.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  41. Tooby, J & Cosmides, L. 2005. 'Conceptual Foundations of Evolutionary Pyschology', in D Buss (ed.), The Handbook of Evolutionary Psychology, John Wiley & Sons, Hoboken, New Jersey.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  42. Tooby J & Cosmides L. 2010. 'Does Beauty Build Adapted Minds?' in Boyd, B, Carroll, J & Gottschall, J (eds), Evolution, Literature and Film: A Reader, Columbia University Press, New York, 174--183.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  43. Garlick, D. 2010. Intelligence and the Brain: Solving the Mystery of Why People Differ in IQ and How a Child Can Be a Genius, Aesop Press, Burbank. (p. 11)Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  44. Jenkins, H. 2001. 'Videogames on the Threshold of Art', guest lecture, University of South Australia, Magill campus, 13th June 2001, Adelaide.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  45. Jenkins, H. 2004. First Person: New Media as Story, Performance, and Game, MIT, Cambridge, Mass.; London. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  46. Jenkins, H. 2007. The Wow Climax: Tracing the Emotional Impact of Popular Culture, New York University Press, New York.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  47. Carroll, J. 2013. 'Correcting for The Corrections: A Darwinian Critique of a Foucauldian Novel', Style, vol. 47, no. 1, 87--118. (see p. 90)Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  48. Balakrishnan, Bimal & Sundar, S. Shyam (2011) 'Where Am I? How Can I Get There? Impact of Navigability and Narrative Transportation on Spatial Presence', Human--Computer Interaction, 26:3, 161--204. DOI = http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/07370024.2011.601689 (see p.197)Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  49. GamesRadar Staff. 2013. 'The Best Videogame Stories Ever', GamesRadar.com, http://www.gamesradar.com/, http://www.gamesradar.com/the-best-videogame-stories-ever/ accessed 14th August 2014Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  50. Csikszentmihalyi, M. 2006. 'A Systems Perspective on Creativity', in J Henry (ed.), Creative Management and Development, SAGE, London, 3--17. (see p.3)Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  51. McIntyre, P. 2012. Creativity and Cultural Production: Issues for Media Practice, Palgrave Macmillan, Basingstoke; New York. (p. 3)Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  52. Simonton, DK 2004, Creativity in Science: Chance, Logic, Genius, and Zeitgeist, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge; New York. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  53. Simonton, DK 2011, Great Flicks: Scientific Studies of Cinematic Creativity and Aesthetics, Oxford University Press, New York; Oxford.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  54. Runco, MA & Jaeger, GJ. 2012. 'The Standard Definition of Creativity', Creativity Research Journal, vol. 24, no. 1, 92--6.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  55. Bateson (2014) in Capra, F & Luisi, PL 2014, The Systems View of Life: A Unifying Vision, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. (see p.200)Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  56. Wilson, EO. 1998. Consilience: The Unity of Knowledge, 1st edn, Knopf: Distributed by Random House, New York.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  57. Carroll, J. 1995. Evolution and Literary Theory, University of Missouri Press, Columbia.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  58. Pinker, S. 2002. The Blank Slate: The Modern Denial of Human Nature, Viking, New York.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  59. Brown, DE. 1991. Human Universals, Temple University Press, Philadelphia.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  60. Pinker, S. 1997. How The Mind Works, Norton, New York.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  61. Miller, JG. 1978. Living Systems, McGraw-Hill, New York.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  62. Luhmann, N. 1995. Social Systems, Writing Science, Stanford University Press, Stanford, Calif.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  63. Kinder, M. 1991. Playing With Power In Movies, Television, And Video Games: From Muppet Babies To Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles, University of California Press, Berkeley. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  64. Jenkins, H. 2003. Transmedia Storytelling, MIT Technology Review, MIT, viewed 8th August 24th 2014, http://www.technologyreview.com/news/401760/transmedia-storytellingGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  65. Dena, C. 2009. Transmedia Practice: Theorising The Practice Of Expressing A Fictional World Across Distinct Media And Environments, Department of Media and Communications, PhD Thesis, Sydney: University of Sydney, University of Sydney, http://www.christydena.com/phd/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  66. Gomez, J. 2007. The 8 Defining Characteristics of a Transmedia Production, PGANMC, viewed 8th August 2014, http://pganmc.blogspot.com.au/2007/10/pga-member-jeff-gomez-left-assembled.htmlGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  67. Velikovsky JT. 2014. In: Transmedia Practice: A Collective Approach, (eds:) Polson D, Cook A-M, Velikovsky JT, & Brackin A. ID-Press, London.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  68. PGA. 2010. Producers Guild Of America Code Of Credits - New Media, PGA, http://www.producersguild.org/?page=coc_nm#transmediaGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  69. Sampson S. 2010. 'Evolution Changes Everything' in Brockman, J (ed), This Will Change Everything: Ideas That Will Shape the Future, 1st edn, Harper Perennial, New York, NY.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  70. Capra, F & Luisi, PL. 2014. The Systems View of Life: A Unifying Vision, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. (see p. 206 for 'downward causation'; see p. 250 for intelligence as problem-solving)Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  71. Boyd, B. 2010. 'Art and Evolution: The Avant-Garde as Test Case -- Spiegelman in The Narrative Corpse', in B Boyd, J Carroll & J Gottschall (eds), Evolution, Literature and Film: A Reader, Columbia University Press, New York. (see p. 238)Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  72. Dutton, D. 2010. The Art Instinct: Beauty, Pleasure and Human Evolution, Oxford University Press, Oxford. (see pp. 51--61 for the twelve 'cluster criteria' for "art".)Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  73. Velikovsky JT. 2012. 'Animation and Narrative in Videogames: A case study -- Looney Tunes: Acme Arsenal', Animation Practice, Process & Production, vol. 2, no. 1-2, pp. 11--48 (38). (see pp. 39--41 for 'agency-structure' duality.)Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  74. Glass, Brian D., Maddox, Todd W., Love, Bradley C. 2013. 'Real-Time Strategy Game Training: Emergence of a Cognitive Flexibility Trait', PLoS ONE, 2013; 8 (8): e70350 DOI = 10.1371/journal.pone.0070350Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  75. Buschkuehl M & Jaeggi SM. 2010. 'Improving Intelligence: A Literature Review.' Swiss Medical Weekly. May; 140 (19-20), 266--72. DOI = smw-12852.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  76. Przybylski, Andrew K.; Deci, Edward L.; Rigby, C. Scott; Ryan, Richard M. 2014. 'Competence-impeding electronic games and players' aggressive feelings, thoughts, and behaviors', Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, Vol 106 (3), Mar 2014, pp. 441--457. DOI = 10.1037/a0034820Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  77. Velikovsky JT. 2014. 'A Hierarchy of Memes', in Practical Memetics, (ed: Dr Martin Farncombe). http://www.practicalmemetics.com/index.php/memetics-101/202-mem-101-holons.html?showall=1&limitstart= accessed 14th August 2014.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  78. Velikovsky, JT. 2012. 'Creative Practice Theory', in StoryAlity, Wordpress.com, Sydney. http://storyality.wordpress.com/creative-practice-theory/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  79. Bourdieu, P & Johnson, RE. 1993. The Field of Cultural Production: Essays on Art and Literature, Columbia University Press, New York.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Flow Theory, Evolution & Creativity: or, 'Fun & Games'

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Other conferences
      IE2014: Proceedings of the 2014 Conference on Interactive Entertainment
      December 2014
      259 pages
      ISBN:9781450327909
      DOI:10.1145/2677758

      Copyright © 2014 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 2 December 2014

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article
      • Research
      • Refereed limited

      Acceptance Rates

      IE2014 Paper Acceptance Rate27of42submissions,64%Overall Acceptance Rate64of148submissions,43%

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader