skip to main content
10.1145/2677832.2677849acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesinternetwareConference Proceedingsconference-collections
Article

Service retrieval based on hybrid SLVM of WSDL

Published:17 November 2014Publication History

ABSTRACT

Two practicable approaches were proposed for Web service retrieval, bipartite-graph matching and KbSM. But their models and similarity metrics of WSDL analysis may ignore some term or semantic feature, and involve formal method problem of representation or difficulty of parameter verification. SLVM and its improved model depend on statistical term measures to implement XML document representation. As a result, they ignore the lexical semantics and the distilled mutual information, leading to text analysis errors. This work proposed a service retrieval method, hybrid SLVM of WSDL, to address the problem of feature extraction. Using WordNet, this method constructed a lexical semantic spectrum to characterize the lexical semantics, and built a special term spectrum based on TF-IDF. Then, feature matrix for WSDL representation was built in the hybrid SLVM. Applying to NWKNN algorithm, on OWLS-TC version 2 dataset, the experimental results show that the feature matrix of our method performs F1 measure and query precisions better than bipartite-graph matching and KbSM.

References

  1. Liu, Fangfang. And Shi, Yuliang. 2010. Measuring Similarity of Web Services Based on WSDL. In Proceedings of the Web Services, 2010 IEEE International Conference on (The Miami, The USA, July 5 - 10, 2010). ICWS'10. IEEE Press, Piscataway, NJ, 155 - 162. DOI= http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/xpl/articleDetails.jsp?arnumber=555 2789. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Yu, Janjun., Guo, Shengmin., Su, Hao. and Zhang, Hui. 2007. A Kernel-based Structure Matching for Web Services Search. In Proceedings of the 16th international conference on World Wide Web (New York, The USA, May 8 – 12, 2007). WWW'07. ACM Press, New York, NY, 1249-1250. DOI= http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=1242791 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Yang, Jianwu. and Chen, Xiaoou. 2002. A Semi—Structured Document Model for Text Mining. Journal of Computer Science and Technology. 17 (Sept. 2002), 603-610. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Miller,G.A. 1995. WordNet: a lexical database for English. Communications of the ACM. 38 (Nov. 1995), 39-41. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Plebani, P. and Pernici, B. 2009. URBE: Web Service Retrieval Based on Similarity Evaluation. Knowledge and Data Engineerin. 21 (Nov. 2009), 1629 - 1642 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Shawe-Taylor, J. and Cristianini, N. 2004 Kernel Methods for Pattern Analysis. United Kingdom: Cambridge University Press. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Yang, Jianwu., Cheung, W K-W. and Chen, Xiaoou. 2009. Learning element similarity matrix for semi-structured document analysis. Knowledge and Information Systems. 19 (Apr. 2009), 53-78. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Church, KW. and Hanks, P. 1990. Word association norms, mutual information, and lexicography. Computational linguistics. 16 (Mar. 1990),22-29. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Sanchez, D. and Batet, M. 2013. A semantic similarity method based on information content exploiting multiple ontologies. Expert Systems with Applications. 40 (Mar. 2013), 1393– 1399. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Aggarwal, CC. and Zhai, ChengXiang. 2012 Mining Text Data: A survey of text classification algorithms. New York Springer. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Lintean, M. and Rus,V. 2012. Measuring Semantic Similarity in Short Texts through Greedy Pairing and Word Semantics. In Proceedings of the 25th International Florida Artificial Intelligence Research Society Conference (Marco Island, USA,) FLAIRS '12. Association for the Advancement of Artificial Intelligence, Florida, 244-249.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Zhang, Wen., Yoshida, Taketoshi. and Tang, Xijin. 2011. A comparative study of TF*IDF, LSI and multi-words for text classification. Expert Systems with Applications, 83 (Mar. 2011), 2758–2765. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Rijsbergen, Van, C J. 1979 Information retrieval. London: Butterworths Press. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Service retrieval based on hybrid SLVM of WSDL

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in
      • Published in

        cover image ACM Other conferences
        Internetware '14: Proceedings of the 6th Asia-Pacific Symposium on Internetware
        November 2014
        152 pages
        ISBN:9781450333030
        DOI:10.1145/2677832
        • General Chairs:
        • Hong Mei,
        • Jian Lv,
        • Program Chairs:
        • Minghui Zhou,
        • Charles Zhang

        Copyright © 2014 ACM

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 17 November 2014

        Permissions

        Request permissions about this article.

        Request Permissions

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • Article

        Acceptance Rates

        Overall Acceptance Rate55of111submissions,50%
      • Article Metrics

        • Downloads (Last 12 months)1
        • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0

        Other Metrics

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader