skip to main content
10.1145/267895.267925acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesfseConference Proceedingsconference-collections
Article
Free Access

The use of program profiling for software maintenance with applications to the year 2000 problem

Authors Info & Claims
Published:01 November 1997Publication History
First page image

References

  1. 1.Abmmson, D., Foster, I., Michalakes, J., and Sosic. R., "Relative debugging: A new methodology for debugging scientific applications," Commun. of the ACM 39(11) pp. 68-77 (Nov. 1996). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. 2.Bala, V., "Low overhead path profiling," Tech. Rep., Hewlett-Packard Labs (1996).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.Boll, T., "Efficiently counting program events with support for on-line queries," ACM Trans. Program. Lang. Syst. 16(5) pp. 1399-1410 (Sept. 1994). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. 4.Ball. T. and Lams. J. "Efficient path profiling in Proc. of MICRO-29. (Dec. 1996). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. 5.Benedusi, P. Benvenuto, V., and Tomacelli,-I,., "The role of testing and dynamic analysis in program comprehension supports," pp. 149-158 in Proc. of the Second IEEE Workshop on Program Comprehension, (July 8-9. 1993, Capri, Italy), ed. B. Fadini and V. Rajlich,IEEE Comp. Sot. Press, Wash,, DC (July 1993).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.Chen, Y.-F., Rosenblum, D.S., and Vo. K.-P., "TestTube: A system for selective regression testing," in Proc. of the sixteenth Int. Co& on Soffiv. Eng., (May 16-21.1994, Sorrento, Italy), IEEE Comp. Sot. Press, Wash., DC(1994). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. 7.Clarke, L.A., Podgurski, A., Richardson, D.J., and Zeil, S.J. "A comparison of data Row path selection criteria," pp. 244-251 in Proc. ofrhe Eighth Int. Conf on Sofno. Eng., IEEE Comp. Sot. Press, __ Wash., DC (1985). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. 8.Gartner Grout. Year 2000 Problem Gains Notional Attention, Gartner Group, Starnford, CT (April 1996). (See irkL http:/Avww.gartner.com/aboutgg/pmssrel/pry2OOO.html.)Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.Horwitz, S., Reps, T. and Binkley, D. "Interprocedural slicing using dependence graphs," ACM Trans. Program. lung. Syst. 12(l) pp. 26-60 (Jan. 1990). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. 10.Johnson, SC., "Postloading for fun and profit," pp. 325-330 in Proc. of the Winter 1990 USENlX Con& (JM. 1990).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.Lams, J.R. and Schnarr, E., "IEEL: Machine-independent executable editing," Proc. of the ACM SIG- PLAN 95 Conf on Programming Language Design and Implementation, (La JOE% CA, June 18-21. 1995) ACM SfGPlAN Notices 30(a) pp. 291300 (June 1995). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. 12.Ottenstein, K.J. and Gttenstein, L.Mi "The program dependence graph in a software development environment." Proc. of the ACM SIGSOFUSIGPPLAN Sofnv. Eng. Symp. on Practical Sofivare Developmen; Environments, (Pittsburgh, PA, Apr. 23-25. i984), ACM-SiGPm Notices 19(S) pp. 177-184 (Mny 1984). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. 13.Rapps, S. and Weyuker. E.J., "Selecting software test data using data Row information," IEEE Truns. on Sofnv. Eng, SEll(4) pp. 367-375 (Apr. 1985). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. 14.Reps, T., Horwitz, S., Sagiv, M., and Rosay. G., "peeding up slicing," SIGSOFT 94: Proc. of the Second ACM SIGSOFTSymp. on the Found of Sofnv. Eng., (New Orleans, LA, Dec. 7-9.1994). ACM SIGSOFTSofnv. Eng. Notes 19(5) pp. 11-20 (Dec. 1994). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. 15.Roper, M., sb/nvare-Testing, McGraw-Hill, New York, NY (1994).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.Seduewick. R. Algorithms. Addison-Wesley. Reading. MA (1983). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. 17.St&d, H.M. and kitsch, H., "Reverse eng&ering programs via dynamic analysis," pp. 192-201 in Proc. of fhe IEEE Working Conf: on Reverse Engineering, (May 21-23, 1993. Baltimore, MD), IEEE Comp. Sot. Press, Wash., DC (May 1993).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.Sneed, H.M. and Erdos, K., "Extracting business rules from source code," pp. 240-247 in Proc. of the Fonrlh IEEE Workshop on Program Comprehension, (Mar. 29-31. 1996, Berlin. Germany), ed. V. Rnjlich, A. Cimitile, and H.A. Mueller,IEEEComp. Sot. Press, Wash., DC (Mar. 1996). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. 19.Srivastnvn, A. and Eustace, A., "ATOM: A system for building customized program analysis tools,' Proc. of the ACM SIGPL4N 94 Co@ on Programming Language Design and Implementation. (Grhmdo, FL, June 22-24,1994), ACM SIGPLAN Notices 29(6) pp. 196-205 (June 1994). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. 20.Weiser, M., "Program slicing," IEEE Trans. on Sofnv. Eng. SElO(4) pp. 352-357 (July 1984).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.Woodward, M.R., Hedley, D., and Hennell. M.A., "Experience with path analysis and testing of programs," IEEE Trans. on Sofnv. Eng. SE6(3) pp. 278-286 (May 1980).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. The use of program profiling for software maintenance with applications to the year 2000 problem

        Recommendations

        Comments

        Login options

        Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

        Sign in
        • Published in

          cover image ACM Conferences
          ESEC '97/FSE-5: Proceedings of the 6th European SOFTWARE ENGINEERING conference held jointly with the 5th ACM SIGSOFT international symposium on Foundations of software engineering
          November 1997
          536 pages
          ISBN:3540635319

          Publisher

          Springer-Verlag

          Berlin, Heidelberg

          Publication History

          • Published: 1 November 1997

          Permissions

          Request permissions about this article.

          Request Permissions

          Check for updates

          Qualifiers

          • Article

          Acceptance Rates

          Overall Acceptance Rate112of543submissions,21%

          Upcoming Conference

          FSE '24

        PDF Format

        View or Download as a PDF file.

        PDF

        eReader

        View online with eReader.

        eReader