skip to main content
10.1145/2684103.2684169acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesmommConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Understanding the Drivers of Sponsors' Intentions in Online Crowdfunding: A Model Development

Published: 08 December 2014 Publication History

Abstract

Crowdfunding, raising funds through small contribution from large amount of individuals, is a conventional fundraising resource. With the development of internet, an online crowdfunding platform became a modern fundraising channel. Online crowdfunding refers to websites for individuals who raise funds through relatively small contributions from relatively large number of individuals via the internet either in the form of donation or in exchange for some forms of rewards or rights. Compared with conventional fundraising resource, for project creators, online crowdfunding can make sponsors understand the idea of projects and then promote the projects, as well as get the comments and funding from the public; for sponsors, it can decrease the sponsoring risks. However, many different types of online crowdfunding grow rapidly. In terms of project creators, it is a problem to choose an online crowdfunding platform which has a number of potential sponsors. Therefore, it is necessary to understand what factors influence on sponsors' intentions, but there are few studies in this domain. According to past studies, we adopted social cognitive theory and proposed a model to deal with the antecedents of sponsors' intentions of online corwdfunding context.

References

[1]
Agrawal, A. K., Catalini, C., and Goldfarb, A. (2013), Some simple economics of crowdfunding (Working Paper No. 19133). Retrieved from National Bureau of Economic Research website: http://www.nber.org/papers/w19133
[2]
Ahmed, A., Rehman, U., Rizwan, M., Rafiq, M. Q., Nawaz, M., and Mumtaz, A. (2013), Moderating Role of Perceived Risk and Innovativeness between Online Shopping Attitude and Intention. Journal of Basic and Applied Scientific Research, 3(11), pp. 310--323
[3]
Aladwani, A. M., and Palvia, P. C. (2002), Developing and validating an instrument for measuring user-perceived web quality. Information and Management, 39(6), pp. 467--476.
[4]
Bandura, A. (1977), Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological Review, 84(2), 191--215.
[5]
Bandura, A. (1986), Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Prentice-Hall, New Jersey.
[6]
Bandura, A. (1997), Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. Freeman, New York.
[7]
Bauer, H. H., Falk, T., and Hammerschmidt, M. (2006), eTransQual: A transaction process-based approach for capturing service quality in online shopping. Journal of Business Research, 59(7), pp. 866--875.
[8]
Belleflamme, P., Lambert, T., and Schwienbacher A. (2014), Crowdfunding: Tapping the right crowd, Journal of Business Venturing, 29(5), pp. 585--609.
[9]
Bock, G. W., Zmud, R. W., Kim, Y. G., and Lee, J. N. (2005), Behavioral intention formation in knowledge sharing: Examining the roles of extrinsic motivators, social-psychological forces, and organizational climate. MIS Quarterly, 29(1), pp. 87--111.
[10]
Bradford, C. S. (2012), Crowdfunding and the federal securities laws, Columbia Business Law Review, 2012(1), pp. 1--150.
[11]
Campbell, M. C., and Goodstein, R. C. (2001), The moderating effect of perceived risk on consumers' evaluations of product incongruity: Preference for the norm. Journal of Consumer Research, 28(3), pp. 439--449.
[12]
Chen, C. J., and Hung, S. W. (2010), To give or to receive? Factors influencing members' knowledge sharing and community promotion in professional virtual communities. Information and Management, 47(4), pp. 226--236.
[13]
Cheung, C. K., and Chan, C. M. (2000), Social-cognitive factors of donating money to charity, with special attention to an international relief organization. Evaluation and Program Planning, 23(2), pp. 241--253.
[14]
Collier, J. E., and Bienstock, C. C. (2006), Measuring service quality in e-retailing. Journal of Service Research, 8(3), pp. 260--275.
[15]
Compeau, D. R., and Higgins, C. A. (1995), Computer self-efficacy: Development of a measure and initial test. MIS Quarterly, pp. 189--211.
[16]
Currás-Pérez, R., and Sánchez-García, I. (2012), Satisfaction and loyalty to a website: The moderating effect of perceived risk. EsicMarket Economic and Business Journal, 141, pp. 183--207.
[17]
Engel, J.F., Blackwell, R.D., and Miniard, P.W. (1993), Consumer Behavior. Dryden Press, Fort Worth.
[18]
Fassnacht, M., and Köse, I. (2007), Consequences of Web - based service quality: Uncovering a multi- faceted chain of effects. Journal of Interactive Marketing, 21(3), pp. 35--54.
[19]
Featherman, M. S., and Pavlou, P. A. (2003), Predicting eservices adoption: A perceived risk facets perspective. International Journal of Human-Computer studies, 59(4), pp. 451--474.
[20]
Füller, J. (2006), Why consumers engage in virtual new product developments initiated by producers. Advances in Consumer Research, 33(1), pp. 639--646.
[21]
Gerber, E. M., Hui, J. S., and Kuo, P. Y. (2012), Crowdfunding: Why people are motivated to post and fund projects on crowdfunding platforms. In Proceeding of the International Workshop on Design, Influence, and Social Technologies: Techniques, Impacts and Ethics, CSCW 2012, February 2012, Bellevue, Washington.
[22]
Gibbons, D. E., and Weingart, L. R. (2001), Can I do it? Will I try? Personal efficacy, assigned goals, and performance norms as motivators of individual performance1. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 31(3), pp. 624--648.
[23]
Hemer, J. (2011), A snapshot on crowdfunding. Fraunhofer Institute for Systems and Innovation Research, Germany. Retrieved from http://www.isi.fraunhofer.de/isiwAssets/docs/p/de/arsbpap_unternehmen_region/ap_r2_2011.pdf
[24]
Hennig- Thurau, T., Gwinner, K. P., Walsh, G., and Gremler, D. D. (2004), Electronic word-of-mouth via consumer- opinion platforms: What motivates consumers to articulate themselves on the Internet? Journal of Interactive Marketing, 18(1), pp. 38--52.
[25]
Hsieh, J. P. A., Rai, A., and Keil, M. (2008), Understanding digital inequality: Comparing continued use behavioral models of the socio-economically advantaged and disadvantaged. MIS Quarterly, 32(1), pp. 97--126.
[26]
Hsu, M. H., and Chiu, C. M. (2004), Internet self-efficacy and electronic service acceptance. Decision Support Systems, 38(3), pp. 369--381.
[27]
Hsu, M. H., Ju, T. L., Yen, C. H., and Chang, C. M. (2007), Knowledge sharing behavior in virtual communities: The relationship between trust, self-efficacy, and outcome expectations. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 65(2), pp. 153--169.
[28]
Hwang, Y., and Kim, D. J. (2007), Customer self-service systems: The effects of perceived Web quality with service contents on enjoyment, anxiety, and e-trust. Decision Support Systems, 43(3), pp. 746--760.
[29]
Im, I., Kim, Y., and Han, H. J. (2008), The effects of perceived risk and technology type on users' acceptance of technologies. Information and Management, 45(1), pp. 1--9.
[30]
Kim, D. J., Ferrin, D. L., and Rao, H. R. (2008), A trust-based consumer decision-making model in electronic commerce: The role of trust, perceived risk, and their antecedents. Decision Support Systems, 44(2), pp. 544--564.
[31]
Kuo, Y. F., Wu, C. M., and Deng, W. J. (2009), The relationships among service quality, perceived value, customer satisfaction, and post-purchase intention in mobile value-added services. Computers in Human Behavior, 25(4), pp. 887--896.
[32]
Kuppuswamy, V., and Bayus, B. L. (2013), Crowdfunding creative ideas: The dynamics of project backers in Kickstarter. Social Science Research Network Electronic Journal. DOI=http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2234765
[33]
Lambert, T., and Schwienbacher, A. (2010), An empirical analysis of crowdfunding. Retrieved from http://www.crowdsourcing.org/document/an-empirical-analysis-of-crowdfunding-/2458
[34]
Lee, G. G., and Lin, H. F. (2005), Customer perceptions of e-service quality in online shopping. International Journal of Retail and Distribution Management, 33(2), pp. 161--176.
[35]
Lin, M. J. J., Hung, S. W., and Chen, C. J. (2009), Fostering the determinants of knowledge sharing in professional virtual communities. Computers in Human Behavior, 25(4), pp. 929--939.
[36]
Lin, T. C., and Huang, C. C. (2008), Understanding knowledge management system usage antecedents: An integration of social cognitive theory and task technology fit. Information and Management, 45(6), pp. 410--417.
[37]
Massolution, (2013), Crowdfunding industry report. Retrieved from http://www.compromisoempresarial.com/wp-content/uploads/137356857-Massolution-2013CF-Excerpt-Revised-04182.pdf
[38]
Mollick, E. (2014), The dynamics of crowdfunding: An exploratory study. Journal of Business Venturing, 29(1), pp. 1--16.
[39]
Ordanini, A., Miceli, L., Pizzetti, M., and Parasuraman, A. (2011), Crowd-funding: Transforming customers into investors through innovative service platforms, Journal of Service Management, 22(4), pp. 443--470.
[40]
Parasuraman, A., Zeithaml, V. A., and Berry, L. L. (1985), A conceptual model of service quality and its implications for future research. Journal of Marketing, 49(4), pp. 41--50.
[41]
Parasuraman, A., Zeithaml, V. A., and Berry, L. L. (1988), SERVQUAL: A multiple-item scale for measuring consumer perceptions of service quality. Journal of Retailing, 64(1), pp. 12--40.
[42]
Rafaeli, S., Raban, D. R., and Ravid, G. (2007), How social motivation enhances economic activity and incentives in the Google Answers knowledge sharing market. International Journal of Knowledge and Learning, 3(1), pp. 1--11.
[43]
Schwienbacher, A., and Larralde, B. (2010), Crowdfunding of small entrepreneurial ventures. Social Science Research Network Electronic Journal. DOI=http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1699183
[44]
Sundaram, D.S., Mitra, K., and Webster, C. (1998), Word-of-mouth communications: A motivational analysis. Advances in Consumer Research, 25(1), pp. 527--531.
[45]
Thatcher, J. B., and Perrewe, P. L. (2002), An empirical examination of individual traits as antecedents to computer anxiety and computer self-efficacy. MIS Quarterly, 26(4), pp. 381--396.
[46]
Tuu, H. H., Olsen, S. O., and Linh, P. T. T. (2011), The moderator effects of perceived risk, objective knowledge and certainty in the satisfaction-loyalty relationship. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 28(5), pp. 363--375.
[47]
Udo, G. J., Bagchi, K. K., and Kirs, P. J. (2010), An assessment of customers'e-service quality perception, satisfaction and intention. International Journal of Information Management, 30(6), pp. 481--492.
[48]
Wheat, R. E., Wang, Y., Byrnes, J. E., and Ranganathan, J. (2013), Raising money for scientific research throughout crowdfunding, Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 28(2), pp. 71--72.
[49]
Wong, D. H., Loh, C., Yap, K. B., and Bak, R. (2009), To trust or not to trust: The consumer's dilemma with E-banking. Journal of Internet Business, 1(6), pp. 3--27.
[50]
Wood, R., and Bandura, A. (1989), Social cognitive theory of organizational management. Academy of Management Review, 14(3), pp. 361--384.
[51]
Wu, J. H., and Wang, S. C. (2005), What drives mobile commerce?: An empirical evaluation of the revised technology acceptance model. Information and Management, 42(5), pp. 719--729.
[52]
Yang, Z., Cai, S., Zhou, Z., and Zhou, N. (2005), Development and validation of an instrument to measure user perceived service quality of information presenting web portals. Information and Management, 42(4), pp. 575--589.
[53]
Yen, H. R., Hsu, S. H. Y., and Huang, C. Y. (2011), Good soldiers on the web: understanding the drivers of participation in online communities of consumption. International Journal of Electronic Commerce, 15(4), pp. 89--120.
[54]
Yi, M. Y., and Hwang, Y. (2003), Predicting the use of web-based information systems: self-efficacy, enjoyment, learning goal orientation, and the technology acceptance model. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 59(4), pp. 431--449.
[55]
Zeithaml, V. A., Parasuraman, A., and Malhotra, A. (2002), Service quality delivery through web sites: A critical review of extant knowledge. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 30(4), pp. 362--375.
[56]
Zhang, Y. (2012), An empirical study into the field of crowdfunding. Master's thesis. Lund University School of Economics and Management, Lund, Sweden.

Cited By

View all
  • (2025)Medical Crowdfunding- “We Make a Living by What We Get but We Make a Life by What We Give”Sustainable Financing—A Contemporary Guide for Green Finance, Crowdfunding and Digital Currencies10.1007/978-3-031-80969-9_9(127-138)Online publication date: 16-Feb-2025
  • (2024)Raising funds on crowdfunding platforms: A meta-analysis connecting the platform and fund provider characteristics to funding intention onlineInformation Systems Management10.1080/10580530.2024.2372267(1-20)Online publication date: 29-Jun-2024
  • (2024)Predicting online donation intention in donation-based crowdfunding apps: a multi-stage SEM-ANN-NCA model integrating anthropomorphism, satisfaction, trust, and privacy concernsJournal of Nonprofit & Public Sector Marketing10.1080/10495142.2024.235101237:1(80-104)Online publication date: 27-May-2024
  • Show More Cited By

Index Terms

  1. Understanding the Drivers of Sponsors' Intentions in Online Crowdfunding: A Model Development

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Information & Contributors

    Information

    Published In

    cover image ACM Other conferences
    MoMM '14: Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Advances in Mobile Computing and Multimedia
    December 2014
    464 pages
    ISBN:9781450330084
    DOI:10.1145/2684103
    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

    In-Cooperation

    • JKU: Johannes Kepler Universität Linz

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    Published: 08 December 2014

    Permissions

    Request permissions for this article.

    Check for updates

    Author Tags

    1. Crowdfunding
    2. perceived risk
    3. reward
    4. self-enhancement
    5. social cognitive theory
    6. sponsorship intention
    7. sponsorship self-efficacy
    8. website service quality

    Qualifiers

    • Research-article
    • Research
    • Refereed limited

    Conference

    MoMM '14

    Contributors

    Other Metrics

    Bibliometrics & Citations

    Bibliometrics

    Article Metrics

    • Downloads (Last 12 months)9
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0
    Reflects downloads up to 05 Mar 2025

    Other Metrics

    Citations

    Cited By

    View all
    • (2025)Medical Crowdfunding- “We Make a Living by What We Get but We Make a Life by What We Give”Sustainable Financing—A Contemporary Guide for Green Finance, Crowdfunding and Digital Currencies10.1007/978-3-031-80969-9_9(127-138)Online publication date: 16-Feb-2025
    • (2024)Raising funds on crowdfunding platforms: A meta-analysis connecting the platform and fund provider characteristics to funding intention onlineInformation Systems Management10.1080/10580530.2024.2372267(1-20)Online publication date: 29-Jun-2024
    • (2024)Predicting online donation intention in donation-based crowdfunding apps: a multi-stage SEM-ANN-NCA model integrating anthropomorphism, satisfaction, trust, and privacy concernsJournal of Nonprofit & Public Sector Marketing10.1080/10495142.2024.235101237:1(80-104)Online publication date: 27-May-2024
    • (2023)Alms tax (ZAKAT) compliance intention among entrepreneurs from a social cognitive perspective: the moderating role of knowledgeJournal of Islamic Accounting and Business Research10.1108/JIABR-04-2022-010414:8(1133-1151)Online publication date: 24-Jan-2023
    • (2021)Local tech mediators - a human access point to global crowdfunding platformsCoDesign10.1080/15710882.2021.191277618:4(483-502)Online publication date: 15-Apr-2021
    • (2018)Empathy or perceived credibility? An empirical study on individual donation behavior in charitable crowdfundingInternet Research10.1108/IntR-06-2017-024028:3(623-651)Online publication date: 4-Jun-2018

    View Options

    Login options

    View options

    PDF

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    Figures

    Tables

    Media

    Share

    Share

    Share this Publication link

    Share on social media