skip to main content
10.1145/2684200.2684321acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesiiwasConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

QFed: Query Set For Federated SPARQL Query Benchmark

Published: 04 December 2014 Publication History

Abstract

Most of the existing benchmark systems for federated SPARQL query systems rely on a set of predefined static queries over a particular set of data sources. Such benchmark are useful for comparing general purpose SPARQL query federation systems such as FedX, SPLENDID etc. However, special purpose federation systems such as TopFed, SAFE etc. cannot be tested with these static benchmarks since these systems only operate on a specific data sets and the corresponding queries. To facilitate the process of benchmarking for such special purpose SPARQL query federation systems, we propose QFed, a dynamic SPARQL query set generator that takes into account the characteristics of both dataset and queries along with the cost of data communication. Our experimental results show that QFed can successfully generate a large set of meaningful federated SPARQL queries to be considered for the performance evaluation of different federated SPARQL query engines.

References

[1]
M. Acosta, M.-E. Vidal, T. Lampo, J. Castillo, and E. Ruckhaus. ANAPSID: an adaptive query processing engine for SPARQL endpoints. In ISWC, 2011.
[2]
M. Arias, J. D. Fernández, M. A. Martínez-Prieto, and P. de la Fuente. An empirical study of real-world sparql queries. CoRR, abs/1103.5043, 2011.
[3]
O. Görlitz and S. Staab. Splendid: Sparql endpoint federation exploiting void descriptions. In COLD, 2011.
[4]
O. Görlitz, M. Thimm, and S. Staab. Splodge: Systematic generation of sparql benchmark queries for linked open data. In ISWC, 2012.
[5]
G. Montoya, M.-E. Vidal, Ó. Corcho, E. Ruckhaus, and C. B. Aranda. Benchmarking federated sparql query engines: Are existing testbeds enough? In ISWC, 2012.
[6]
M. H. Nur Aini Rakhmawati, Marcel Karnstedt and S. Decker. On metrics for measuring fragmentation of federation over sparql endpoints. In WEBIST, 2014.
[7]
M. Saleem, M. Kamdar, A. Iqbal, S. Sampath, H. Deus, and A.-C. Ngonga Ngomo. Big linked cancer data: Integrating linked tcga and . JWS, 2014.
[8]
M. Saleem and A.-C. N. Ngomo. Hibiscus: Hypergraph-based source selection for sparql endpoint federation. In ESWC. 2014.
[9]
M. Saleem, A.-C. N. Ngomo, J. X. Parreira, H. F. Deus, and M. Hauswirth. Daw: Duplicate-aware federated query processing over the web of data. In ISWC. 2013.
[10]
M. Schmidt, O. GÃűrlitz, P. Haase, A. Schwarte, and T. Tran. Fedbench: A benchmark suite for federated semantic data query processing. In ISWC, 2011.
[11]
M. Schmidt, T. Hornung, G. Lausen, and C. Pinkel. Sp2bench: a sparql performance benchmark. In ICDE,2009.
[12]
A. Schwarte, P. Haase, K. Hoose, R. Schenkel, and M. Schmidt. Fedx: A federation layer for distributed query processing on linked open data. In ESWC, 2011.
[13]
J. Umbrich, A. Hogan, A. Polleres, and S. Decker. Improving the recall of live linked data querying through reasoning. In RR, 2012.

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)A systematic overview of data federation systemsSemantic Web10.3233/SW-22320115:1(107-165)Online publication date: 12-Jan-2024
  • (2023)FedShop: A Benchmark for Testing the Scalability of SPARQL Federation EnginesThe Semantic Web – ISWC 202310.1007/978-3-031-47243-5_16(285-301)Online publication date: 27-Oct-2023
  • (2021)An empirical evaluation of cost-based federated SPARQL query processing enginesSemantic Web10.3233/SW-20042012:6(843-868)Online publication date: 1-Jan-2021
  • Show More Cited By

Index Terms

  1. QFed: Query Set For Federated SPARQL Query Benchmark

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Information & Contributors

    Information

    Published In

    cover image ACM Other conferences
    iiWAS '14: Proceedings of the 16th International Conference on Information Integration and Web-based Applications & Services
    December 2014
    587 pages
    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

    In-Cooperation

    • @WAS: International Organization of Information Integration and Web-based Applications and Services
    • Johannes Kepler Univ Linz: Johannes Kepler Universität Linz

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    Published: 04 December 2014

    Permissions

    Request permissions for this article.

    Check for updates

    Author Tags

    1. Data Integration
    2. Federation SPARQL Query
    3. Linked Data

    Qualifiers

    • Research-article
    • Research
    • Refereed limited

    Conference

    iiWAS '14

    Contributors

    Other Metrics

    Bibliometrics & Citations

    Bibliometrics

    Article Metrics

    • Downloads (Last 12 months)2
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0
    Reflects downloads up to 02 Mar 2025

    Other Metrics

    Citations

    Cited By

    View all
    • (2024)A systematic overview of data federation systemsSemantic Web10.3233/SW-22320115:1(107-165)Online publication date: 12-Jan-2024
    • (2023)FedShop: A Benchmark for Testing the Scalability of SPARQL Federation EnginesThe Semantic Web – ISWC 202310.1007/978-3-031-47243-5_16(285-301)Online publication date: 27-Oct-2023
    • (2021)An empirical evaluation of cost-based federated SPARQL query processing enginesSemantic Web10.3233/SW-20042012:6(843-868)Online publication date: 1-Jan-2021
    • (2018)LusailProceedings of the VLDB Endowment10.1145/3164135.316414411:4(485-498)Online publication date: 5-Oct-2018
    • (2017)LusailProceedings of the VLDB Endowment10.1145/3186728.316414411:4(485-498)Online publication date: 1-Dec-2017
    • (2017)Diefficiency Metrics: Measuring the Continuous Efficiency of Query Processing ApproachesThe Semantic Web – ISWC 201710.1007/978-3-319-68204-4_1(3-19)Online publication date: 4-Oct-2017

    View Options

    Login options

    View options

    PDF

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    Figures

    Tables

    Media

    Share

    Share

    Share this Publication link

    Share on social media