skip to main content
10.1145/2684793.2684794acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesaintecConference Proceedingsconference-collections
tutorial

On the Impact of Mobile Network Delays on Connection Establishment Performance of a Carrier Grade NAT Device

Published:26 November 2014Publication History

ABSTRACT

IPv4 addresses are nearly exhausted worldwide. For some time until IPv6 becomes pervasive as an ultimate solution, deployment of Carrier Grade NAT (CGN) devices becomes necessary, especially in the mobile carriers' networks which anticipate a large and growing number of new users. In this context, we tackle the evaluation of the impact of inserting a CGN device in the network, and in conjunction with the mobile network communication delays. We compare the Connection Establishment Rate (CER) with or without a CGN device, also with or without the emulated mobile network communication delays. Against our anticipation, the types of time-varying mobile network delays do not have a significant impact on CER. The effect of the changing delay fades away in the aggregation of many user traffic at the core part of the network, even though the time-varying mobile network communication delays are individually and separately emulated for each user. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first to study the relationship between the CGN performance and the mobile network's communication delays. The result suggests that modeling the aggregate traffic trend (such as the constant delay portion in the network dynamics) is more important rather than emulating each user's traffic separately.

References

  1. S. Alcock, R. Nelson, and D. Miles. Investigating the Impact of Service Provider NAT on Residential Broadband Users. Technical report, University of Waikato, 2010.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. M. Allman. On the Performance of Middleboxes. In Proc. of IMC, pages 307--312. ACM, 2003. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. APNIC. APNIC - APNIC IPv4 Address Pool Reaches Final /8. http://www.apnic.net/publications/news/2011/final-8.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. APNIC. APNIC - IPv4 exhaustion details. http://www.apnic.net/community/ipv4-exhaustion/ipv4-exhaustion-details.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. ARIN. ARIN Enters Phase Four of the IPv4 Countdown Plan. https://www.arin.net/announcements/2014/20140423.html.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. ARIN. The IANA IPv4 Address Free Pool is now Depleted. https://www.arin.net/announcements/2011/20110203.html.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. G. Detal, B. Hesmans, O. Bonaventure, Y. Vanaubel, and B. Donnet. Revealing Middlebox Interference with Tracebox. In Proc. of IMC, pages 1--8. ACM, 2013. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. C. Donley, L. Howard, V. Kuarsingh, J. Berg, and J. Doshi. Assessing the Impact of Carrier-Grade NAT on Network Applications. RFC 7021, Sept. 2013.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. A. Durand, R. Droms, J. Woodyatt, and Y. Lee. Dual-Stack Lite Broadband Deployments Following IPv4 Exhaustion. RFC 6333, Aug. 2011.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. J. Huang, F. Qian, Y. Guo, Y. Zhou, Q. Xu, Z. M. Mao, S. Sen, and O. Spatscheck. An In-depth Study of LTE: Effect of Network Protocol and Application Behavior on Performance. In Proc. of SIGCOMM, pages 363--374. ACM, 2013. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. T. Miyachi, K. Chinen, and Y. Shinoda. StarBED and SpringOS: Large-scale General Purpose Network Testbed and Supporting Software. In Proc. of VALUETOOLS. ACM, 2006. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. T. Miyachi, T. Nakagawa, K. Chinen, S. Miwa, and Y. Shinoda. StarBED and SpringOS Architectures and Their Performance. In Proc. of TRIDENTCOM, pages 43--58. Springer, 2011.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. S. Miyakawa. IPv4 to IPv6 Transformation Schemes. IEICE Transactions, E93-B(5):1078--1084, May 2010.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. A. Müller, F. Wohlfart, and G. Carle. Analysis and Topology-based Traversal of Cascaded Large Scale NATs. In Proc. of HotMiddlebox Workshop, pages 43--48. ACM, 2013. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. S. Perreault, I. Yamagata, S. Miyakawa, A. Nakagawa, and H. Ashida. Common Requirements for Carrier-Grade NATs (CGNs). RFC 6888, Apr. 2013.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. RIPE NCC. RIPE NCC Begins to Allocate IPv4 Address Space From the Last /8 -- RIPE Network Coordination Centre. http://www.ripe.net/internet-coordination/news/announcements/ripe-ncc-begins-to-allocate-ipv4-address-space-from-the-last-8.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. P. Srisuresh and M. Holdrege. IP Network Address Translator (NAT) Terminology and Considerations. RFC 2663, Aug. 1999. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. S. Triukose, S. Ardon, A. Mahanti, and A. Seth. Geolocating IP Addresses in Cellular Data Networks. In Proc. of PAM, pages 158--167. Springer-Verlag, 2012. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. Z. Wang, Z. Qian, Q. Xu, Z. Mao, and M. Zhang. An Untold Story of Middleboxes in Cellular Networks. In Proc. of SIGCOMM, pages 374--385. ACM, 2011. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. On the Impact of Mobile Network Delays on Connection Establishment Performance of a Carrier Grade NAT Device

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in
      • Published in

        cover image ACM Other conferences
        AINTEC '14: Proceedings of the 10th Asian Internet Engineering Conference
        November 2014
        82 pages
        ISBN:9781450332514
        DOI:10.1145/2684793

        Copyright © 2014 ACM

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 26 November 2014

        Permissions

        Request permissions about this article.

        Request Permissions

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • tutorial
        • Research
        • Refereed limited

        Acceptance Rates

        Overall Acceptance Rate15of38submissions,39%

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader