skip to main content
10.1145/2685553.2685558acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagescscwConference Proceedingsconference-collections
abstract

Ethics for Studying Online Sociotechnical Systems in a Big Data World

Authors Info & Claims
Published:28 February 2015Publication History

ABSTRACT

The evolution of social technology and research methods present ongoing challenges to studying people online. Recent high-profile cases have prompted discussion among both the research community and the general public about the ethical implications of researching humans, their information, and their activities in large-scale digital contexts. Examples of scientific and market research involving Facebook users and OKCupid clients exemplify the ethical complexities of both studying and manipulating online user behavior. When does data science become human subjects research, and what are our obligations to these subjects as researchers' Drawing from previous work around the ethics of digital research, one goal of this workshop is to work towards a set of guiding principles for CSCW scholars doing research online.

References

  1. Anderson, M. OKCupid, Facebook Not Alone in Studying Consumers. ABC News, (2014). http://abcnews.go.com/Technology/wireStory/okcupid-facebook-studying-consumers-24762549Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Beaulieu, A. and Estallea, A. Rethinking research ethics for mediated settings. Information, Communication and Society, 15(1) (2012), 23--42.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. Boellstorff, T., Nardi, B., Pearce, C., and Taylor, T. L. Ethnography and Virtual Worlds: A Handbook of Method. Princeton University Press, 2012.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. Branham, S. M., Thieme, A., Nathan, L. P., Harrison, S., Tatar, D., and Olivier, P. Co-creating & Identity-making in CSCW: Revisiting Ethics in Design Research. Proceedings of the Companion Publication of the 17th ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work & Social Computing, ACM (2014), 305--308. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Bromseth, J. C. H. Public places - public activities? Methodological approaches and ethical dilemmas in research on computer-mediated communication contexts. In A. Morrison (Ed.), Researching ICTs in Context (pp. 33--61). Inter/Media Report 3/2002. University of Oslo, 2002.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Bruckman, A. Studying the amateur artist: A perspective on disguising data collected in human subjects on the Internet. Ethics and Information Technology, 4 (2002), 217--231. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Bruckman, A. Karahalios, K., Kraut, R. E., Poole, E., Thomas, J. C., and Yardi. Revisiting research ethics in the Facebook Era: Challenging in Emerging CSCW Research. CSCW'10 Workshop, (2010).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Buchanan, E., & Ess. C. Internet research ethics and the Institutional Review Board: Current practices and issues. Computers and Society 39 (2009), 43--49. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Ess, C. Digital Media Ethics. Polity, 2009.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Hudson, J. M. and Bruckman, A. "Go Away": Participant Objections to Being Studied and the Ethics of Chatroom Research. The Information Society 20, 2 (2004), 127--139.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. Kadushin, C. Who benefits from network analysis: ethics of social network research. Social Networks 27, 2 (2005), 139--153.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. Klemmer, R. S., Thomsen, M., Phelps-Goodman, E., Lee, R. and Landay, J. A. Where do web sites come from? Capturing and interacting with design history. In Proc. CHI 2002, ACM Press (2002), 1--8. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Kramer, A. D. I., Guillory, J. E. and Hancock, J. T. Experimental evidence of massive-scale emotional contagion through social networks. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 111(24) (2014), 8788--8790.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  14. Kraut, R., Olsen, J., Banaji, M., Bruckman, A., Cohen, J., and Couper, M. Psychological Research Online: Report of Board of Scientific Affairs' Advisory Group on the Conduct of Research on the Internet. American Psychologist, 59 (2) (2004), 105--117.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  15. Markham, A. Fabrication as ethical practice: Qualitative inquiry in ambiguous internet contexts. Information, Communication, and Society, 5(3) (2012), 334--353.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  16. Markham, C. and Buchanan, E. Ethical decision-making and Internet research: Recommendations from the aoir ethics working committee v2.0. Idea Group Publishing, 2002.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Mather, B. D. Making up titles for conference papers. Ext. Abstracts CHI 2000, ACM Press (2000), 1--2.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Rudder, C. We Experiment On Human Beings! OkTrends: Dating research from OKCupid, (2014). http://blog.okcupid.com/index.php/we-experiment-on-human-beings/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Zimmer, M. But the data is already public: On the ethics of research in Facebook. Ethics & Information Technology, 12(4) (2010), 313--325. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Ethics for Studying Online Sociotechnical Systems in a Big Data World

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      CSCW'15 Companion: Proceedings of the 18th ACM Conference Companion on Computer Supported Cooperative Work & Social Computing
      February 2015
      350 pages
      ISBN:9781450329460
      DOI:10.1145/2685553

      Copyright © 2015 Owner/Author

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of part or all of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for third-party components of this work must be honored. For all other uses, contact the Owner/Author.

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 28 February 2015

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • abstract

      Acceptance Rates

      CSCW'15 Companion Paper Acceptance Rate161of575submissions,28%Overall Acceptance Rate2,235of8,521submissions,26%

      Upcoming Conference

      CSCW '24

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader