skip to main content
10.1145/2686612.2686690acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesozchiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Quality management of user-generated content in participatory journalism

Authors Info & Claims
Published:02 December 2014Publication History

ABSTRACT

Newsrooms utilize increasing amounts of user-generated content (UGC) in news making. However, managing the quality of UGC is challenging. Our three-phase study identifies qualities of newsworthy UGC, and ways to enhance the quality of contributions by online feedback. Review of 31 UGC-driven websites revealed as the most used methods of improving the quality of contributions flagging of inappropriate content, counts of sharing to social media services, ratings, user's activity statistics, and badges. Interviews of news editors and reader reporters showed a conceptual difference in the qualities of good news content. Interviewed reader reporters expressed the feedback from the newsroom as the most important for their development in addition to seeing the examples by other reader reporters. Content was perceived as more important than competition in case of readers' UGC. Communal quality management conventions, online community elements, and guidelines for developing quality management are presented.

References

  1. Agichtein, E., Castillo, C., Donato, D., Gionis, A. & Mishne, G. 2008. Finding High-Quality Content in Social Media. Proc. WSDM '08 ACM Press, 183--194. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Bradshaw, P. & Rohumaa, L. 2011. The online journalism handbook: skills to survive and thrive in the digital age. Gosport, Ashford Colour Press Ltd. 203 p.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Chai, K., Potdar, V. & Dillon T. 2009. Content Quality Assessment Related Frameworks for Social Media. ICCSA 2009, (2009). Berlin, Springer. 791--805. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Deterding, S., Dixon, D., Khaled, R. & Nacke, L. From Game Design Elements to Gamefulness: Defining "Gamification". Proc. MindTrek'11, ACM Press. (2011), 9--15. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Diakopoulos, N. & Naaman, M. Towards Quality Discourse in Online News Comments. Proc. CSCW2011 (2011) ACM Press, 133--142 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Dijck, J. 2009. Users like you? Theorizing agency in user-generated content. Media Culture & Society 31, 1, 41--58.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. Dooms, S., Pessemier, T. D.e. & Martens, L. An online evaluation of explicit feedback mechanisms for recommender systems. Proc. WEBIST. 2011.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Dow, S., Kulkarni, A., Klemmer, S., Hartmann, B. Shepherding the Crowd Yields Better Work. Proc. CSCW'12 (2012), ACM Press, 1013--1022. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Ghosh, A. & McAfee, P. 2011. Incentivizing High-quality User-Generated Content. Proc. WWW '11 (2011), 137--146. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Hartmann, J., Sutcliffe, A. & De Angeli, A. 2008. Towards a Theory of User Judgment of Aesthetics and User Interface Quality. ACM TOCHI, 15, 4, pp. 1--30. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Harcup, T., and O'Neill, D. What Is News? Galtung and Ruge revisited, Journalism Studies, 2, 2 (2001) 261--280.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Hänska-Ahy, M., Shapour, R.: Who's Reporting the Protests? Converging Practices of Citizen Journalists and Two BBC World Service Newsrooms, from Iran's Election Protests to the Arab uprisings. Journalism Studies 14, 1 (2013), 29--45.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. ISO SFS-EN 9000. 2001. Quality management systems: Fundamentals and vocabulary.Finnish Standards Association.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. John, B. M., Chua, A. Y. & Goh, D. H. What Makes a High-Quality User-Generated Answer? Internet Computing 15, 1. (2011), 66--71. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Jones, J. & Altadonna, N. We don't need no stinkin' badges: examining the social role of badges in the Huffington Post. Proc. CSCW2012, ACM Press. 249--252. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Kim, H-S. & Sundar S. S. Using interface Cues in Online Health Community Boards to Change Impressions and Encourage User Contribution. Proc. CHI 2011, ACM (2011). 599--608. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Lai, S. Iconic Images and and Citizen Journalism. Proc. iConference 2011, 702--703. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. Montola, M., Nummenmaa, T., Lucero, A., Boberg, M. & Korhonen, H. 2009. Applying Game Achievement Systems to Enhance User Experience in a Photo Sharing Service. Proc. MindTrek '09, ACM Press, 2009, 94--97. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. Otterbacher, J. 2009. "Helpfulness" in Online Communities: A Measure of Message Quality. Proc. CHI '09, ACM 955--964. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. Saldaña, J. The Coding Manual for Qualitative Researchers. London, UK, SAGE (2009), 223 p.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. Snyder, C. Paper Prototyping. Elsevier, USA (2003), 378 p.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. Smith, J. Essential reporting. SAGE, UK, (2007), 264 p.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. Tausczik, Y. R. & Pennebaker, J. W. 2012. Participation in an Online Mathematics Community: Differentiating Motivations to Add. Proc. CSCW2012, ACM Press. 207--216. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. Tomaiulo, N. 2009. U-Content Citizen Journalism. Searcher 17, 9, pp. 12--54.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. Väätäjä, H. Mobile reader reporters' user experience factors. Deliverable D. 3.2.1.7. Next Media SHOK, 2011. Available at: http://tinyurl.com/vaataja-NextMedia2011Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. Väätäjä, H., Sirkkunen, E. & Ahvenainen, M. 2013. A Field Trial on Mobile Crowdsourcing of News Content Factors Influencing Participation. Human-Computer Interaction--INTERACT 2013. Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 54--73.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. Väätäjä, H., Sirkkunen, E. & Salo, K. 2011. Crowdsourced News Reporting -- Supporting News Content Creation with Mobile Phones. Proc. MobileHCI ACM Press. 435--444. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  28. Väätäjä, H., Vainio, T. & Sirkkunen, E. 2012. Location-based crowdsourcing of hyperlocal news: dimensions of participation preferences. Proc. GROUP '12). ACM. 85--94. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  29. Zachary, F-W., Tjondronegoro, D. & Wyeth, P. Orientation Passport: Using gamification to engage university students. Proc. OzCHI '11 ACM Press. (2011) 122--125. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Quality management of user-generated content in participatory journalism

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Other conferences
      OzCHI '14: Proceedings of the 26th Australian Computer-Human Interaction Conference on Designing Futures: the Future of Design
      December 2014
      689 pages
      ISBN:9781450306539
      DOI:10.1145/2686612
      • Conference Chair:
      • Tuck Leong

      Copyright © 2014 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 2 December 2014

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

      Acceptance Rates

      OzCHI '14 Paper Acceptance Rate85of176submissions,48%Overall Acceptance Rate362of729submissions,50%

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader