skip to main content
10.1145/2691352.2691355acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagescsercConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Model solutions and properties for diagnosing student programs in Ask-Elle

Published:05 November 2014Publication History

ABSTRACT

Ask-Elle is an interactive tutor that supports the stepwise development of simple functional programs. Using Ask-Elle students receive feedback about whether or not they are on the right track, they can ask for a hint when they are stuck, and get suggestions about how to refactor their program. Our tutor generates this feedback from model solutions and properties that a solution should satisfy. This paper studies the feasibility of using model solutions together with the desired properties of solutions to analyse the work of a student. It describes an experiment in which we analyse almost 3500 log entries from students using Ask-Elle to solve functional programming exercises, to determine how many of these programs are diagnosed correctly based on model solutions and the desired properties of solutions. Ask-Elle manages to correctly diagnose 82.9% of the student programs. A further analysis of the student programs and the diagnoses shows that adding some reasonable model solutions, properties of model solutions, and general program transformations would increase this percentage to 92.9%.

References

  1. Kirsti M Ala-Mutka. 2005. A Survey of Automated Assessment Approaches for Programming Assignments. Computer Science Education 15, 2 (2005), 83--102.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. Koen Claessen and John Hughes. 2000. QuickCheck: A Light-weight Tool for Random Testing of Haskell Programs. In Proceedings of ICFP 2000: International Conference on Functional Programming. ACM, 268--279. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Alex Gerdes, Johan Jeuring, and Bastiaan Heeren. 2010. Using strategies for assessment of programming exercises. In Proceedings of SIGCSE 2010: the 41st ACM technical symposium on Computer science education, Gary Lewandowski, Steven A. Wolfman, Thomas J. Cortina, and Ellen Lowenfeld Walker (Eds.). ACM, 441--445. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Alex Gerdes, Johan Jeuring, and Bastiaan Heeren. 2012. An Interactive Functional Programming Tutor. In Proceedings of ITICSE 2012: the 17th Annual Conference on Innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education, T. Lapidot, J. Gal-Ezer, M. E. Caspersen, and O. Hazzan (Eds.). ACM, 250--255. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Bastiaan Heeren, Daan Leijen, and Arjan van IJzendoorn. 2003. Helium, for Learning Haskell. In Proceedings of Haskell 2003: the ACM SIGPLAN Workshop on Haskell. ACM, 62--71. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Johan Jeuring, Alex Gerdes, and Bastiaan Heeren. 2011. A programming tutor for Haskell. In Proceedings of CEFP 2011: Lecture Notes of the Central European School on Functional Programming, Viktória Zsók, Zoltan Horváth, and Rinus Plasmeijer (Eds.). LNCS, Vol. 7241. Springer, 1--45. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Wei Jin, Tiffany Barnes, John C. Stamper, Michael John Eagle, Matt Johnson, and Lorrie Lehmann. 2012. Program Representation for Automatic Hint Generation for a Data-Driven Novice Programming Tutor. In Proceedings of ITS 2012: the 11th International Conference on Intelligent Tutoring Systems, Stefano A. Cerri, William J. Clancey, Giorgos Papadourakis, and Kitty Panourgia (Eds.). LNCS, Vol. 7315. Springer, 304--309. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Simon Peyton Jones et al. 2003. Haskell 98, Language and Libraries. The Revised Report. Cambridge University Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Kelly Rivers and Kenneth R. Koedinger. 2014. Automating Hint Generation with Solution Space Path Construction. In Proceedings of ITS 2014: the 12th International Conference on Intelligent Tutoring Systems, Stefan Trausan-Matu, Kristy Elizabeth Boyer, Martha Crosby, and Kitty Panourgia (Eds.). LNCS, Vol. 8474. Springer, 329--339.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Rishabh Singh, Sumit Gulwani, and Armando Solar-Lezama. 2013. Automated Feedback Generation for Introductory Programming Assignments. In Proceedings of PLDI 2013: the 34th ACM SIGPLAN Conference on Programming Language Design and Implementation. ACM, 15--26. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Kurt VanLehn. 2011. The relative effectiveness of human tutoring, intelligent tutoring systems, and other tutoring systems. Educational Psychologist 46, 4 (2011), 197--221.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. Jeroen Voeten. 2001. On the Fundamental Limitations of Transformational Design. ACM Transactions on Design Automation of Electronic Systems 6, 4 (2001), 533--552. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Songwen Xu and Yam San Chee. 2003. Transformation-Based Diagnosis of Student Programs for Programming Tutoring Systems. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering 29, 4 (2003), 360--384. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Model solutions and properties for diagnosing student programs in Ask-Elle

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in
      • Published in

        cover image ACM Other conferences
        CSERC '14: Proceedings of the Computer Science Education Research Conference
        November 2014
        94 pages
        ISBN:9781450333474
        DOI:10.1145/2691352

        Copyright © 2014 ACM

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 5 November 2014

        Permissions

        Request permissions about this article.

        Request Permissions

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • research-article

        Acceptance Rates

        Overall Acceptance Rate24of60submissions,40%

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader