Abstract
This article surveys recent work with an algorithmic flavor in Bayesian mechanism design. Bayesian mechanism design involves optimization in economic settings where the designer possesses some stochastic information about the input. Recent years have witnessed huge advances in our knowledge and understanding of algorithmic techniques for Bayesian mechanism design problems. These include, for example, revenue maximization in settings where buyers have multi-dimensional preferences, optimization of non-linear objectives such as makespan, and generic reductions from mechanism design to algorithm design. However, a number of tantalizing questions remain un-solved.
This article is meant to serve as an introduction to Bayesian mechanism design for a novice, as well as a starting point for a broader literature search for an experienced researcher.
- Abraham, I., Athey, S., Babaioff, M., and Grubb, M. 2013. Peaches, lemons, and cookies: Designing auction markets with dispersed information. In Proceedings of the Fourteenth ACM Conference on Electronic Commerce. EC '13. ACM, New York, NY, USA, 7--8. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Alaei, S. 2014. Bayesian combinatorial auctions: Expanding single buyer mechanisms to many buyers. SIAM Journal on Computing 43, 2, 930--972.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Alaei, S., Fu, H., Haghpanah, N., and Hartline, J. D. 2013. The simple economics of approximately optimal auctions. In IEEE Symp. on Foundations of Computer Science. 628--637. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Alaei, S., Fu, H., Haghpanah, N., Hartline, J. D., and Malekian, A. 2012. Bayesian optimal auctions via multi- to single-agent reduction. In ACM Conf. on Electronic Commerce. 17. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Ashlagi, I., Dobzinski, S., and Lavi, R. 2009. An optimal lower bound for anonymous scheduling mechanisms. In Proceedings of the 10th ACM Conference on Electronic Commerce. EC '09. 169--176. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Azar, P. D., Daskalakis, C., Micali, S., and Weinberg, S. M. 2013. Optimal and efficient parametric auctions. In ACM Symp. on Discrete Algorithms. 596--604. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Azar, P. D., Kleinberg, R., and Weinberg, S. M. 2014. Prophet inequalities with limited information. In ACM Symp. on Discrete Algorithms. 1358--1377. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Babaioff, M., Immorlica, N., Lucier, B., and Weinberg, S. M. 2014. A simple and approximately optimal mechanism for an additive buyer. arXiv:1405.6146.Google Scholar
- Babaioff, M., Kleinberg, R., and Leme, R. P. 2012. Optimal mechanisms for selling information. In ACM Conf. on Electronic Commerce. 92--109. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Bei, X. and Huang, Z. 2011. Bayesian incentive compatibility via fractional assignments. In ACM Symp. on Discrete Algorithms. 720--733. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Bhalgat, A., Chakraborty, T., and Khanna, S. 2012. Mechanism design for a risk averse seller. In Workshop on Internet and Network Economics (WINE). 198--211. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Bhalgat, A., Gollapudi, S., and Munagala, K. 2013. Optimal auctions via the multiplicative weight method. In ACM Conf. on Electronic Commerce. 73--90. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Bhattacharya, S., Goel, G., Gollapudi, S., and Munagala, K. 2010. Budget constrained auctions with heterogeneous items. In ACM Symp. on Theory of Computing. 379--388. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Blumrosen, L. and Nisan, N. 2009. On the computational power of demand queries. SIAM J. Comput. 39, 4, 1372--1391. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Border, K. 2007. Reduced form auctions revisited. Economic Theory 31, 1, 167--181.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Border, K. C. 1991. Implementation of reduced form auctions: A geometric approach. Econometrica 59, 4, 1175--87.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Briest, P. 2008. Uniform budgets and the envy-free pricing problem. In ICALP. 808--819. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Briest, P., Chawla, S., Kleinberg, R., and Weinberg, S. M. 2014. Pricing randomized allocations. Journal of Economic Theory. To appear.Google Scholar
- Brualdi, R. A. 1969. Comments on bases in dependence structures. Bulletin of the Australian Mathematical Society 1, 161--167.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Bulow, J. and Klemperer, P. 1996. Auctions vs negotiations. American Economic Review 86, 1, 180--194.Google Scholar
- Bulow, J. and Roberts, J. 1989. The simple economics of optimal auctions. The Journal of Political Economy 97, 1060--90.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Cai, Y. and Daskalakis, C. 2011. Extreme-value theorems for optimal multidimensional pricing. In IEEE Symp. on Foundations of Computer Science. 522--531. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Cai, Y., Daskalakis, C., and Weinberg, S. M. 2012a. An algorithmic characterization of multi-dimensional mechanisms. In ACM Symp. on Theory of Computing. 459--478. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Cai, Y., Daskalakis, C., and Weinberg, S. M. 2012b. Optimal multidimensional mechanism design: Reducing revenue to welfare maximization. In IEEE Symp. on Foundations of Computer Science. 130--139. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Cai, Y., Daskalakis, C., and Weinberg, S. M. 2013a. Reducing revenue to welfare maximization: Approximation algorithms and other generalizations. In ACM Symp. on Discrete Algorithms. 578--595. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Cai, Y., Daskalakis, C., and Weinberg, S. M. 2013b. Understanding incentives: Mechanism design becomes algorithm design. In IEEE Symp. on Foundations of Computer Science. 618--627. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Cai, Y. and Huang, Z. 2013. Simple and nearly optimal multi-item auctions. In ACM Symp. on Discrete Algorithms. 564--577. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Chakraborty, T., Even-Dar, E., Guha, S., Mansour, Y., and Muthukrishnan, S. 2010. Approximation schemes for sequential posted pricing in multi-unit auctions. In WINE. 158--169. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Chawla, S., Fu, H., and Karlin, A. 2014. Approximate revenue maximization in interdependent value settings. In ACM Conf. on Electronic Commerce. To appear. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Chawla, S., Hartline, J. D., and Kleinberg, R. D. 2007. Algorithmic pricing via virtual valuations. In ACM Conf. on Electronic Commerce. 243--251. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Chawla, S., Hartline, J. D., Malec, D. L., and Sivan, B. 2010. Multi-parameter mechanism design and sequential posted pricing. In ACM Symp. on Theory of Computing. 311--320. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Chawla, S., Hartline, J. D., Malec, D. L., and Sivan, B. 2013. Prior-independent mechanisms for scheduling. In ACM Symp. on Theory of Computing. 51--60. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Chawla, S., Hartline, J. D., and Sivan, B. 2012. Optimal crowdsourcing contests. In ACM Symp. on Discrete Algorithms. 856--868. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Chawla, S., Immorlica, N., and Lucier, B. 2012. On the limits of black-box reductions in mechanism design. In ACM Symp. on Theory of Computing. 435--448. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Chawla, S., Malec, D. L., and Malekian, A. 2011. Bayesian mechanism design for budget-constrained agents. In ACM Conf. on Electronic Commerce. 253--262. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Chawla, S., Malec, D. L., and Sivan, B. 2012. The power of randomness in bayesian optimal mechanism design. Games and Economic Behavior. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.geb.2012.08.010.Google Scholar
- Che, Y.-K., Kim, J., and Mierendorff, K. 2013. Generalized reduced-form auctions: A network-flow approach. Econometrica 81, 6, 2487--2520.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Chen, X., Diakonikolas, I., Paparas, D., Sun, X., and Yannakakis, M. 2014. The complexity of optimal multidimensional pricing. In ACM Symp. on Discrete Algorithms. 1319--1328. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Chen, X., Hu, G., Lu, P., and Wang, L. 2011. On the approximation ratio of k-lookahead auction. In Workshop on Internet and Network Economics (WINE). 61--71. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Chung, K. and Ely, J. C. 2006. Ex-post incentive compatible mechanism design. Manuscript.Google Scholar
- Cole, R. and Roughgarden, T. 2014. The sample complexity of revenue maximization. In ACM Symp. on Theory of Computing. To appear. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Constantin, F. and Parkes, D. C. 2009. Self-correcting sampling-based dynamic multi-unit auctions. In ACM Conf. on Electronic Commerce. 89--98. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Cremer, J. and McLean, R. P. 1988. Full Extraction of the Surplus in Bayesian and Dominant Strategy Auctions. Econometrica 56, 6 (November), 1247--57.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Csapó, G. and Müller, R. 2013. Optimal mechanism design for the private supply of a public good. Games and Economic Behavior 80, C, 229--242.Google Scholar
- Daskalakis, C., Deckelbaum, A., and Tzamos, C. 2012. Optimal pricing is hard. In Workshop on Internet and Network Economics (WINE). 298--308. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Daskalakis, C., Deckelbaum, A., and Tzamos, C. 2013. Mechanism design via optimal transport. In ACM Conf. on Electronic Commerce. 269--286. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Daskalakis, C., Deckelbaum, A., and Tzamos, C. 2014. The complexity of optimal mechanism design. In ACM Symp. on Discrete Algorithms. 1302--1318. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Daskalakis, C. and Pierrakos, G. 2011. Simple, optimal and efficient auctions. In Workshop on Internet and Network Economics (WINE). 109--121. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Daskalakis, C. and Weinberg, S. M. 2014. Bayesian truthful mechanisms for job scheduling from bi-criterion approximation algorithms. arXiv:1405.5940.Google Scholar
- Deb, R. and Pai, M. 2013. Ironing in dynamic revenue management: Posted prices & biased auctions. In ACM Symp. on Discrete Algorithms. 620--631. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Devanur, N. R., Hartline, J. D., Karlin, A. R., and Nguyen, C. T. 2011. Prior-independent multi-parameter mechanism design. In Workshop on Internet and Network Economics (WINE). 122--133. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Dhangwatnotai, P., Roughgarden, T., and Yan, Q. 2010. Revenue maximization with a single sample. In ACM Conf. on Electronic Commerce. 129--138. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Dobzinski, S., Fu, H., and Kleinberg, R. D. 2011. Optimal auctions with correlated bidders are easy. In ACM Symp. on Theory of Computing. 129--138. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Dobzinski, S. and Vondrak, J. 2012. The computational complexity of truthfulness in combinatorial auctions. In Proceedings of the 13th ACM Conference on Electronic Commerce. EC '12. ACM, New York, NY, USA, 405--422. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Dughmi, S., Immorlica, N., and Roth, A. 2014. Constrained signaling in auction design. In ACM Symp. on Discrete Algorithms. 1341--1357. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Dughmi, S. and Roughgarden, T. 2010. Black-box randomized reductions in algorithmic mechanism design. In FOCS. 775--784. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Emek, Y., Feldman, M., Gamzu, I., Leme, R. P., and Tennenholtz, M. 2012. Signaling schemes for revenue maximization. In ACM Conf. on Electronic Commerce. 514--531. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Fu, H., Haghpanah, N., Hartline, J., and Kleinberg, R. 2014. Optimal auctions for correlated bidders with sampling. In ACM Conf. on Electronic Commerce. To appear. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Fu, H., Hartline, J. D., and Hoy, D. 2013. Prior-independent auctions for risk-averse agents. In ACM Conf. on Electronic Commerce. 471--488. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Ghosh, A. and Kleinberg, R. 2014. Optimal contest design for simple agents. In ACM Conf. on Electronic Commerce. To appear. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Ghosh, A. and Roth, A. 2011. Selling privacy at auction. In Proceedings of the 12th ACM Conference on Electronic Commerce. EC '11. ACM, New York, NY, USA, 199--208. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Hart, S. and Nisan, N. 2012. Approximate revenue maximization with multiple items. In ACM Conf. on Electronic Commerce. 656. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Hart, S. and Nisan, N. 2013. The menu-size complexity of auctions. In ACM Conf. on Electronic Commerce. 565--566. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Hartline, J. D. 2013a. Bayesian mechanism design. Foundations and Trends in Theoretical Computer Science 8, 3, 143--263.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Hartline, J. D. 2013b. Mechanism design and approximation. http://jasonhartline.com/MDnA/.Google Scholar
- Hartline, J. D., Kleinberg, R., and Malekian, A. 2011. Bayesian incentive compatibility via matchings. In ACM Symp. on Discrete Algorithms. 734--747. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Hartline, J. D. and Lucier, B. 2010. Bayesian algorithmic mechanism design. In ACM Symp. on Theory of Computing. 301--310. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Hartline, J. D. and Roughgarden, T. 2008. Optimal mechanism design and money burning. In ACM Symp. on Theory of Computing. 75--84. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Hartline, J. D. and Roughgarden, T. 2009. Simple versus optimal mechanisms. In ACM Conf. on Electronic Commerce. 225--234. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Huang, Z., Wang, L., and Zhou, Y. 2011. Black-box reductions in mechanism design. In Intl. Workshop on Approximation Algorithms for Combinatorial Optimization Problems (APPROX). 254--265. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Jehiel, P., Vehn, M. M.-t., Moldovanu, B., and Zame, W. R. 2006. The limits of ex post implementation. Econometrica 74, 3 (May), 585--610.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Kleinberg, R. and Weinberg, S. M. 2012. Matroid prophet inequalities. In ACM Symp. on Theory of Computing. 123--136. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Krishna, V. 2009. Auction theory. Academic press.Google Scholar
- Li, X. and Yao, A. C.-C. 2013. On revenue maximization for selling multiple independently distributed items. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.Google Scholar
- Li, Y. 2013. Approximation in mechanism design with interdependent values. In ACM Conf. on Electronic Commerce. 675--676. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Manelli, A. and Vincent, D. 2007. Multidimensional mechanism design: Revenue maximization and the multiple-good monopoly. Journal of Economic Theory 137, 1, 153--185.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Manelli, A. M. and Vincent, D. R. 2006. Bundling as an optimal selling mechanism for a multiple-good monopolist. Journal of Economic Theory 127, 1 (March), 1--35.Google ScholarCross Ref
- McAfee, R. P. and Reny, P. J. 1992. Correlated Information and Mechanism Design. Econometrica 60, 2 (March), 395--421.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Milgrom, P. R. and Weber, R. J. 1982. A Theory of Auctions and Competitive Bidding. Econometrica 50, 5 (September), 1089--1122.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Miltersen, P. B. and Sheffet, O. 2012. Send mixed signals: earn more, work less. In ACM Conf. on Electronic Commerce. 234--247. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Minooei, H. and Swamy, C. 2013. Near-optimal and robust mechanism design for covering problems with correlated players. In Conference on Web and Internet Economics (WINE). 377--390.Google Scholar
- Myerson, R. 1981. Optimal auction design. Mathematics of Operations Research 6, 58--73.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Nisan, N. 2014. Algorithmic mechanism design (through the lens of multi-unit auctions). To appear in the Handbook of Game Theory, IV.Google Scholar
- Nisan, N. and Ronen, A. 2001. Algorithmic mechanism design. Games and Economic Behavior 35, 1-2, 166--196.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Papadimitriou, C. H. and Pierrakos, G. 2011. On optimal single-item auctions. In ACM Symp. on Theory of Computing. 119--128. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Parkes, D. C. 2009. When analysis fails: Heuristic mechanism design via self-correcting procedures. In SOFSEM. 62--66. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Parkes, D. C. and Duong, Q. 2007. An ironing-based approach to adaptive online mechanism design in single-valued domains. In AAAI. 94--101. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Pavlov, G. 2011a. Optimal mechanism for selling two goods. The B.E. Journal of Theoretical Economics 11, 1.Google Scholar
- Pavlov, G. 2011b. A property of solutions to linear monopoly problems. The B.E. Journal of Theoretical Economics 11, 4.Google Scholar
- Riley, J. and Zeckhauser, R. 1983. Optimal Selling Strategies: When to Haggle, When to Hold Firm. The Quarterly Journal of Economics 98, 2 (May), 267--89.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Rochet, J.-C. 1987. A necessary and sufficient condition for rationalizability in a quasi-linear context. Journal of Mathematical Economics 16, 2 (April), 191--200.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Rochet, J.-C. and Chone, P. 1998. Ironing, Sweeping, and Multidimensional Screening. Econometrica 66, 4, 783--826.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Ronen, A. 2001. On approximating optimal auctions. In ACM Conf. on Electronic Commerce. 11--17. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Ronen, A. and Saberi, A. 2002. On the hardness of optimal auctions. In IEEE Symp. on Foundations of Computer Science. 396--405. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Roughgarden, T. and Talgam-Cohen, I. 2013. Optimal and near-optimal mechanism design with interdependent values. In ACM Conf. on Electronic Commerce. 767--784. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Roughgarden, T., Talgam-Cohen, I., and Yan, Q. 2012. Supply-limiting mechanisms. In ACM Conf. on Electronic Commerce. 844--861. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Samuel-Cahn, E. 1984. Comparison of threshold stop rules and maximum for independent nonnegative random variables. The Annals of Probability 12, 4, 1213--1216.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Sivan, B. and Syrgkanis, V. 2013. Vickrey auctions for irregular distributions. In Conference on Web and Internet Economics (WINE). 422--435.Google Scholar
- Sundararajan, M. and Yan, Q. 2010. Robust mechanisms for risk-averse sellers. In ACM Conf. on Electronic Commerce. 139--148. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Syrgkanis, V., Kempe, D., and Tardos, E. 2013. Information asymmetries in common-value auctions with discrete signals. In SSRN.Google Scholar
- Syrgkanis, V. and Tardos, E. 2013. Composable and efficient mechanisms. In ACM Symp. on Theory of Computing. 211--220. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Thanassoulis, J. E. 2004. Haggling Over Substitutes. Journal of Economic Theory 117, 2, 217--245.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Vohra, R. 2011. Mechanism design: A linear programming approach (Econometric society monographs). Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
- Wang, Z. and Tang, P. 2014. Optimal mechanisms with simple menus. In ACM Conf. on Electronic Commerce. To appear. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Wilson, R. 1969. Competitive bidding with disparate information. Management Sciences 15.Google Scholar
- Yan, Q. 2011. Mechanism design via correlation gap. In ACM Symp. on Discrete Algorithms. 710--719. Google ScholarDigital Library
Index Terms
- Bayesian algorithmic mechanism design
Recommendations
Bayesian algorithmic mechanism design
STOC '10: Proceedings of the forty-second ACM symposium on Theory of computingThe principal problem in algorithmic mechanism design is in merging the incentive constraints imposed by selfish behavior with the algorithmic constraints imposed by computational intractability. This field is motivated by the observation that the ...
Approximation in mechanism design with interdependent values
EC '13: Proceedings of the fourteenth ACM conference on Electronic commerceThe seminal work of [Myerson 1981] shows that the simple Vickrey-Clarke-Groves (VCG) mechanism with monopoly reserves is optimal in single-item auctions where agents have independent and identically distributed private values. [Hartline and Roughgarden ...
Multi-Unit Bayesian Auction with Demand or Budget Constraints
We consider the problem of revenue maximization on multi-unit auctions where items are distinguished by their relative values; any pair of items has the same ratio of values to all buyers. As is common in the study of revenue maximizing problems, we ...
Comments