skip to main content
10.1145/2693787.2693804acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesesemConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Something Old, Something New, Something Borrowed: gathering experts' feedback while performing heuristic evaluation with a list of heuristics targeted at older adults

Authors Info & Claims
Published:11 November 2014Publication History

ABSTRACT

This paper discusses the topic of evaluating systems for health and entertainment when specifically targeting the older adult population. Building upon and extending on two previous studies that used a well-known discount usability evaluation method, heuristic evaluation, as well as a list of heuristics specifically created to evaluate smartphone apps that keep older adults' needs and characteristics in mind, this paper presents the assessment of the previous aggregated list of heuristics by ten experts after using it. Results show that the list of heuristics used in our previous studies does receive a positive assessment by the ten evaluators in terms of their appropriateness, completeness, usefulness, and clarity. Moreover, this paper reinforces that despite being a conventional and mature method, heuristic evaluation does offers valuable feedback regarding user interface flaws.

References

  1. Flurry. 2014. Health and Fitness Apps Finally Take Off http://bit.ly/1stx8j9Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Mashable. 2012. Doctors Believe Using Health Apps Will Cut Down on Visits http://mashable.com/2012/03/12/mobile-health/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Jakob Nielsen. 1993. Usability Engineering. Morgan Kaufmann Publishers Inc., San Francisco, CA, USA. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Vasconcelos, A., et al., Designing tablet-based games for seniors: the example of CogniPlay, a cognitive gaming platform, in Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Fun and Games. 2012, ACM: Toulouse, France. p. 1--10. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Theng, Y.-L., P. H. Chua, and T. P. Pham. Wii as entertainment and socialisation aids for mental and social health of the elderly. in CHI'12 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 2012. ACM Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Kawamoto, A., V. Martins, and F. Silva, Usability Evaluation of an Application Designed for the Older Adults, in Entertainment Computing -- ICEC 2013, J. Anacleto, et al., Editors. 2013, Springer Berlin Heidelberg. p. 189--192.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Jakob Nielsen and Rolf Molich. 1990. Heuristic evaluation of user interfaces. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '90), Jane Carrasco Chew and John Whiteside (Eds.). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 249--256. DOI=10.1145/97243.97281 http://doi.acm.org.eres.library.manoa.hawaii.edu/10.1145/97243.97281 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Watkins I, Kules B, Yuan X, Xie B. Heuristic Evaluation of Healthy Eating Apps for Older Adults. Journal of Consumer Health On the Internet 2014;18(2):105Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Piotr Calak. 2012. Smartphone Evaluation Heuristics for Older Adults. Thesis. University of Guelph.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Mahatody, T., Sagar, M., & Kolski, C. 2010. State of the Art on the Cognitive Walkthrough Method, Its Variants and Evolutions. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 741--785.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Barron J, Bedra M, Wood J, Finkelstein J. Exploring three perspectives on feasibility of a patient portal for older adults. Stud Health Technol Inform. 2014;202:181--4.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Jaspers MW. A comparison of usability methods for testing interactive health technologies: methodological aspects and empirical evidence. Int J Med Inform. 2009;78(5):340--53.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Silva, P., Holden, K., Nii, A. Smartphones, smart seniors, but not-so-smart apps. HCII conference proceedings. (2014).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Silva, P., Holden, K., Jordan, P. Towards a List of Heuristics to Evaluate Smartphone Apps Targeted at Older Adults: A Study with Apps that Aim at Promoting Health and Well-being. HICSS conference proceedings (2015). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. U.S. Preventive Services Task Force: Guide to Clinical Preventive Services.. Williams and Wilkens, Baltimore, MD, USA (1996).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Something Old, Something New, Something Borrowed: gathering experts' feedback while performing heuristic evaluation with a list of heuristics targeted at older adults

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Other conferences
      ACE '14 Workshops: Proceedings of the 2014 Workshops on Advances in Computer Entertainment Conference
      November 2014
      120 pages
      ISBN:9781450333146
      DOI:10.1145/2693787

      Copyright © 2014 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 11 November 2014

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article
      • Research
      • Refereed limited

      Acceptance Rates

      Overall Acceptance Rate36of90submissions,40%

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader