research-article

Towards a catalog of usability smells

Authors:

José Creissac Campos,

João Carlos SilvaAuthors Info & Claims

SAC '15: Proceedings of the 30th Annual ACM Symposium on Applied Computing

Pages 175 - 181

https://doi.org/10.1145/2695664.2695670

Published: 13 April 2015 Publication History

Abstract

This paper presents a catalog of smells in the context of interactive applications. These so-called usability smells are indicators of poor design on an application's user interface, with the potential to hinder not only its usability but also its maintenance and evolution. To eliminate such usability smells we discuss a set of program/usability refactorings. In order to validate the presented usability smells catalog, and the associated refactorings, we present a preliminary empirical study with software developers in the context of a real open source hospital management application. Moreover, a tool that computes graphical user interface behavior models, giving the applications' source code, is used to automatically detect usability smells at the model level.

References

[1]

R. Abreu, J. Cunha, J. P. Fernandes, P. Martins, A. Perez, and J. Saraiva. Smelling faults in spreadsheets. In 2014 IEEE International Conference on Software Maintenance and Evolution (ICSME), pages 111--120. IEEE Computer Society, Sept 2014.

Digital Library

[2]

L. Bass, B. E. John, N. Juristo, and M.-I. Sanchez-Segura. Usability-supporting architectural patterns. In Proc. 26th Int. Conf. on Software Engineering, ICSE '04, pages 716--717. IEEE Computer Society, 2004.

Digital Library

[3]

P. Berkhin. A survey on pagerank computing. Internet Mathematics, 2:73--120, 2005.

[4]

W.-K. Chen and J.-C. Wang. Bad smells and refactoring methods for gui test scripts. In T. Hochin and R. Y. Lee, editors, SNPD, pages 289--294. IEEE Computer Society, 2012.

Digital Library

[5]

W.-K. Chen and J.-C. Wang. Bad smells and refactoring methods for gui test scripts. In Software Engineering, Artificial Intelligence, Networking and Parallel Distributed Computing (SNPD), 2012 13th ACIS International Conference on, pages 289--294, Aug 2012.

Digital Library

[6]

J. Cunha, J. P. Fernandes, H. Ribeiro, and J. Saraiva. Towards a catalog of spreadsheet smells. In Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Computational Science and Its Applications - Volume Part IV, ICCSA'12, pages 202--216, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2012. Springer-Verlag.

Digital Library

[7]

B. Daniel, Q. Luo, M. Mirzaaghaei, D. Dig, D. Marinov, and M. Pezzè. Automated GUI refactoring and test script repair. In Proceedings of the First International Workshop on End-to-End Test Script Engineering, ETSE '11, pages 38--41, New York, NY, USA, 2011. ACM.

Digital Library

[8]

A. Dix, J. E. Finlay, G. D. Abowd, and R. Beale. Human-Computer Interaction (3rd Ed). Prentice-Hall, 2003.

Digital Library

[9]

M. Fowler. Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code. Addison-Wesley Professional, 1999.

Digital Library

[10]

F. Hermans, M. Pinzger, and A. van Deursen. Detecting and visualizing inter-worksheet smells in spreadsheets. In Proc. 34th Int. Conf. on Software Engineering, ICSE '12, pages 441--451. IEEE Press, 2012.

Digital Library

[11]

F. Hermans, M. Pinzger, and A. van Deursen. Detecting and refactoring code smells in spreadsheet formulas. Empirical Software Engineering, pages 1--27, 2014.

Digital Library

[12]

J. Johnson. GUI Bloopers 2.0. Morgan Kaufmann, 2007.

[13]

M. Kim, T. Zimmermann, and N. Nagappan. An empirical study of refactoring challenges and benefits at microsoft. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, 40(7), July 2014.

Digital Library

[14]

D. Leijen. wxhaskell: A portable and concise gui library for haskell. In Proceedings of the 2004 ACM SIGPLAN Workshop on Haskell, Haskell '04, pages 57--68, New York, NY, USA, 2004. ACM.

Digital Library

[15]

A. Miniukovich and A. De Angeli. Quantification of interface visual complexity. In Proceedings of the 2014 International Working Conference on Advanced Visual Interfaces, AVI '14, pages 153--160, New York, NY, USA, 2014. ACM.

Digital Library

[16]

G. H. Pinto and F. Kamei. What programmers say about refactoring tools?: An empirical investigation of stack overflow. In Proceedings of the 2013 ACM Workshop on Workshop on Refactoring Tools, WRT '13, pages 33--36, New York, NY, USA, 2013. ACM.

Digital Library

[17]

J. Silva, J. C. Campos, and J. Saraiva. Combining formal methods and functional strategies regarding the reverse engineering of interactive applications. In Interactive Systems, volume 4323 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pages 137--150. Springer, 2007.

Digital Library

[18]

J. Silva, J. Saraiva, and J. Campos. A generic library for GUI reasoning and testing. In SAC '09: Proc. ACM Symp. on Applied Computing, pages 121--128. ACM, 2009.

Digital Library

[19]

J. C. Silva, J. C. Campos, and J. Saraiva. Models for the reverse engineering of Java/Swing applications. In 3rd Int. Wksp on Metamodels, Schemas, Grammars, and Ontologies for Reverse Eng., number 1/2006 in Mainzer Informatik-Berichte. Johannes Gutenberg-Universität Mainz, 2006.

[20]

J. C. Silva, C. Silva, R. D. Gonçalo, J. Saraiva, and J. C. Campos. The GUISurfer tool: Towards a language independent approach to reverse engineering GUI code. In Proc. 2nd ACM SIGCHI Symp. Eng. Interactive Computing Systems, EICS '10, pages 181--186. ACM, 2010.

Digital Library

[21]

A. Tacy, R. Hanson, J. Essington, and A. Tökke. GWT in Action. Manning Publications Co., 2nd edition, 2013.

Digital Library

[22]

M. G. T. Van den Brand, H. A. de Jong, P. Klint, and P. A. Olivier. Efficient annotated terms. Softw. Pract. Exper., 30(3):259--291, Mar. 2000.

Digital Library

[23]

M. Zen and J. Vanderdonckt. Towards an evaluation of graphical user interfaces aesthetics based on metrics. In M. Bajec, M. Collard, and R. DeneckÃÍre, editors, IEEE 8th International Conference on Research Challenges in Information Science, RCIS 2014, Marrakech, Morocco, May 28-30, 2014, pages 1--12. IEEE, 2014.

Cited By

Alemneh EBerhanu F(2024)Software Requirement Smells and Detection Techniques: A Systematic Literature ReviewCybernetics and Information Technologies10.2478/cait-2024-003724:4(78-107)Online publication date: 18-Dec-2024
https://doi.org/10.2478/cait-2024-0037
Aranda MOliveira NSoares ERibeiro MRomão DPatriota UGheyi RSouza EMachado I(2024)A Catalog of Transformations to Remove Smells From Natural Language TestsProceedings of the 28th International Conference on Evaluation and Assessment in Software Engineering10.1145/3661167.3661225(7-16)Online publication date: 18-Jun-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3661167.3661225
Sera RWashizaki HChen JFukazawa YTaga MNakagawa KSakai YHonda KGraziotin DNolte A(2024)Development of Data-driven Persona Including User Behavior and Pain Point through Clustering with User Log of B2B SoftwareProceedings of the 2024 IEEE/ACM 17th International Conference on Cooperative and Human Aspects of Software Engineering10.1145/3641822.3641870(85-90)Online publication date: 14-Apr-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3641822.3641870
Show More Cited By

Index Terms

Towards a catalog of usability smells

Recommendations

Are architectural smells independent from code smells? An empirical study
Highlights
- Case study analyzing the correlations among code smells, groups of code smells and architectural smells.
Abstract
Background. Architectural smells and code smells are symptoms of bad code or design that can cause different quality problems, such as faults, technical debt, or difficulties with maintenance and evolution. Some studies ...
Evaluating Usability of IFML Models: How Usability is Perceived and Propagated
IHC '18: Proceedings of the 17th Brazilian Symposium on Human Factors in Computing Systems

System acceptance is strongly related to its usability. It is important that the usability is carefully designed during the system design steps and later propagated to the interface. This care avoids reworking the interface design of an application in ...
On the diffuseness and the impact on maintainability of code smells: a large scale empirical investigation
Abstract
Code smells are symptoms of poor design and implementation choices that may hinder code comprehensibility and maintainability. Despite the effort devoted by the research community in studying code smells, the extent to which code smells in ...

Comments

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Conferences

SAC '15: Proceedings of the 30th Annual ACM Symposium on Applied Computing

April 2015

2418 pages

ISBN:9781450331968

DOI:10.1145/2695664

Conference Chairs:
Roger L. Wainwright
University of Tulsa
,
Juan Manuel Corchado
University of Salamanca, Spain
,
Program Chairs:
Alessio Bechini
University of Pisa, Italy
,
Jiman Hong
Soongsil University, South Korea

Copyright © 2015 ACM.

Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

Sponsors

SIGAPP: ACM Special Interest Group on Applied Computing

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 13 April 2015

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Request Permissions

Check for updates

Author Tags

Qualifiers

Research-article

Funding Sources

ERDF - European Regional Development Fund & FCT - Portuguese Foundation for Science and Technology

Conference

SAC 2015

Sponsor:

SIGAPP

SAC 2015: Symposium on Applied Computing

April 13 - 17, 2015

Salamanca, Spain

Acceptance Rates

SAC '15 Paper Acceptance Rate 291 of 1,211 submissions, 24%;

Overall Acceptance Rate 1,650 of 6,669 submissions, 25%

Upcoming Conference

SAC '25

Sponsor:
sigapp

The 40th ACM/SIGAPP Symposium on Applied Computing

March 31 - April 4, 2025

Catania , Italy

Contributors

Other Metrics

View Article Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

17
Total Citations
View Citations
292
Total Downloads

Downloads (Last 12 months)15
Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0

Reflects downloads up to 05 Mar 2025

Other Metrics

View Author Metrics

Citations

Cited By

Alemneh EBerhanu F(2024)Software Requirement Smells and Detection Techniques: A Systematic Literature ReviewCybernetics and Information Technologies10.2478/cait-2024-003724:4(78-107)Online publication date: 18-Dec-2024
https://doi.org/10.2478/cait-2024-0037
Aranda MOliveira NSoares ERibeiro MRomão DPatriota UGheyi RSouza EMachado I(2024)A Catalog of Transformations to Remove Smells From Natural Language TestsProceedings of the 28th International Conference on Evaluation and Assessment in Software Engineering10.1145/3661167.3661225(7-16)Online publication date: 18-Jun-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3661167.3661225
Sera RWashizaki HChen JFukazawa YTaga MNakagawa KSakai YHonda KGraziotin DNolte A(2024)Development of Data-driven Persona Including User Behavior and Pain Point through Clustering with User Log of B2B SoftwareProceedings of the 2024 IEEE/ACM 17th International Conference on Cooperative and Human Aspects of Software Engineering10.1145/3641822.3641870(85-90)Online publication date: 14-Apr-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3641822.3641870
Fawad MRasool GPalma F(2024)Android Source Code Smells: A Systematic Literature ReviewSoftware: Practice and Experience10.1002/spe.3401Online publication date: 27-Dec-2024
https://doi.org/10.1002/spe.3401
Gupta PAnand AMellal M(2023)Resource Allocation Modeling Framework to Refactor Software Design SmellsInternational Journal of Mathematical, Engineering and Management Sciences10.33889/IJMEMS.2023.8.2.0138:2(213-229)Online publication date: 1-Apr-2023
https://doi.org/10.33889/IJMEMS.2023.8.2.013
Gupta PAnand ADas RHughes LDwivedi Y(2023)Developing algorithmic business resource optimization model for code smells detection: an applied case insight from enterprise level software management systemAnnals of Operations Research10.1007/s10479-023-05536-7Online publication date: 25-Aug-2023
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-023-05536-7
Jerzyk MMadeyski L(2023)Code Smells: A Comprehensive Online Catalog and TaxonomyDevelopments in Information and Knowledge Management Systems for Business Applications10.1007/978-3-031-25695-0_24(543-576)Online publication date: 19-Mar-2023
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-25695-0_24
de Souza Santos FVinícius Treviso MGama Sde Mattos Fortes R(2022)A Framework to Semi-automated Usability Evaluations Processing Considering Users’ Emotional AspectsHuman-Computer Interaction. Theoretical Approaches and Design Methods10.1007/978-3-031-05311-5_29(419-438)Online publication date: 16-Jun-2022
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-05311-5_29
de Oliveira T. Souza Jde Souza AVasconcelos LBaldochi L(2021)Usability Smells: A Systematic ReviewITNG 2021 18th International Conference on Information Technology-New Generations10.1007/978-3-030-70416-2_36(281-288)Online publication date: 5-Jun-2021
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-70416-2_36
Patnaik NHallett JRashid A(2019)Usability smellsProceedings of the Fifteenth USENIX Conference on Usable Privacy and Security10.5555/3361476.3361494(245-257)Online publication date: 12-Aug-2019
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.5555/3361476.3361494
Show More Cited By

View Options

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Full Access

Get this Publication

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

eReader

View online with eReader.

Figures

Tables

Media

View Table of Conten