skip to main content
10.1145/2702123.2702153acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageschiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

You Tweet What You Eat: Studying Food Consumption Through Twitter

Published:18 April 2015Publication History

ABSTRACT

Food is an integral part of our lives, cultures, and well-being, and is of major interest to public health. The collection of daily nutritional data involves keeping detailed diaries or periodic surveys and is limited in scope and reach. Alternatively, social media is infamous for allowing its users to update the world on the minutiae of their daily lives, including their eating habits. In this work we examine the potential of Twitter to provide insight into US-wide dietary choices by linking the tweeted dining experiences of 210K users to their interests, demographics, and social networks. We validate our approach by relating the caloric values of the foods mentioned in the tweets to the state-wide obesity rates, achieving a Pearson correlation of 0.77 across the 50 US states and the District of Columbia. We then build a model to predict county-wide obesity and diabetes statistics based on a combination of demographic variables and food names mentioned on Twitter. Our results show significant improvement over previous CHI research (Culotta 2014). We further link this data to societal and economic factors, such as education and income, illustrating that areas with higher education levels tweet about food that is significantly less caloric. Finally, we address the somewhat controversial issue of the social nature of obesity (Christakis & Fowler 2007) by inducing two social networks using mentions and reciprocal following relationships.

References

  1. Abisheva, A., Garimella, V. R. K., Garcia, D., and Weber, I. Who watches (and shares) what on youtube? and when?: using twitter to understand youtube viewership. In WSDM (2014). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Ahn, Y.-Y., Ahnert, S. E., Bagrow, J. P., and Barabási, A.-L. Flavor network and the principles of food pairing. Nature Scientific reports (2011).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Aramaki, E., Maskawa, S., and Morita, M. Twitter catches the flu: Detecting influenza epidemics using twitter. In EMNLP (2011). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Bian, J., Topaloglu, U., and Yu, F. Towards large-scale twitter mining for drug-related adverse events. In SHB (2012). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Cawley, J., and Meyerhoefer, C. The medical care costs of obesity: an instrumental variables approach. Journal of health economics 31, 1 (2012), 219--230.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Christakis, N. A., and Fowler, J. H. The spread of obesity in a large social network over 32 years. New England journal of medicine 357, 4 (2007), 370--379.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Chunara, R., Bouton, L., Ayers, J. W., and Brownstein, J. S. Assessing the online social environment for surveillance of obesity prevalence. PloS one 8, 4 (2013), e61373.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Cohen-Cole, E., and Fletcher, J. M. Is obesity contagious? social networks vs. environmental factors in the obesity epidemic. Journal of Health Economics 27, 5 (2008), 1382--1387.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. Culotta, A. Lightweight methods to estimate influenza rates and alcohol sales volume from twitter messages. Language Resources and Evaluation (2013), 1--22. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Culotta, A. Estimating county health statistics with twitter. In CHI (2014). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Cutler, D. M., Glaeser, E. L., and Shapiro, J. M. Why have americans become more obese? Journal of Economic Perspectives 17 (2003), 93--118.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. de Castro, J. M. Seasonal rhythms of human nutrient intake and meal pattern. Physiology & behavior 50, 1 (1991), 243--248.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Donohew, L., Ray, E., and Donohew, L. Public health campaigns: Individual message strategies and a model. Communication and health: Systems and applications (1990), 136--152.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Fischler, C. Food, self and identity. Social science information 27, 2 (1988), 275--292.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Gershenson, C., Gasca-González, O. O., Delgado-Reyes, L., Pérez-Cruz, J. C., Orozco-Gómez, L. P., Hernández-Salazar, L., Moguel-Ancheita, S., Ramírez-Moreno, M. A., Morales-Cruz, M. V., Cortés-Gastélum, M. A., et al. Epidemiology and social networks. Cir Cir 79 (2011), 199--200.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Haimson, O. L., Brubaker, J. R., and Hayes, G. R. Ddfseeks same: Sexual health-related language in online personal ads for men who have sex with men. In CHI (2014). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Kooti, F., Mason, W. A., Gummadi, K. P., and Cha, M. Predicting emerging social conventions in online social networks. In CIKM (2012). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. Paul, M. J., and Dredze, M. You are what you tweet: Analyzing twitter for public health. In ICWSM (2011).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Prier, K. W., Smith, M. S., Giraud-Carrier, C., and Hanson, C. L. Identifying health-related topics on twitter. In Social computing, behavioral-cultural modeling and prediction. Springer, 2011, 18--25. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. Romero, D. M., Meeder, B., and Kleinberg, J. Differences in the mechanics of information diffusion across topics: idioms, political hashtags, and complex contagion on twitter. In WWW (2011). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. Sadilek, A., and Kautz, H. Modeling the impact of lifestyle on health at scale. In WSDM (2013). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. Schwartz, H. A., Eichstaedt, J. C., Kern, M. L., Dziurzynski, L., Agrawal, M., Park, G. J., Lakshmikanth, S. K., Jha, S., Seligman, M. E., Ungar, L., et al. Characterizing geographic variation in well-being using tweets. In ICWSM (2013).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. Silva, T. H., Vaz de Melo, P. O. S., Almeida, J., Musolesi, M., and Loureiro, A. You Are What You Eat (and Drink): Identifying Cultural Boundaries by Analyzing Food and Drink Habits in Foursquare. In ICWSM (2014).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. Takhteyev, Y., Gruzd, A., and Wellman, B. Geography of twitter networks. Social networks 34, 1 (2012), 73--81.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. Valente, T. W. Social network thresholds in the diffusion of innovations. Social networks 18, 1 (1996), 69--89.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. Wagner, C., Singer, P., and Strohmaier, M. Spatial and Temporal Patterns of Online Food Preferences. In WWW (Republic and Canton of Geneva, Switzerland, 2014). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  27. West, R., White, R. W., and Horvitz, E. From cookies to cooks: insights on dietary patterns via analysis of web usage logs. In WWW (2013). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  28. Xie, W., Li, C., Zhu, F., Lim, E.-P., and Gong, X. When a friend in twitter is a friend in life. In WebSci (2012). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  29. Yom-Tov, E., Fernandez-Luque, L., Weber, I., and Crain, S. P. Pro-anorexia and pro-recovery photo sharing: a tale of two warring tribes. Journal of medical Internet research 14, 6 (2012).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  30. Zhu, Y.-X., Huang, J., Zhang, Z.-K., Zhang, Q.-M., Zhou, T., and Ahn, Y.-Y. Geography and similarity of regional cuisines in china. PloS one 8, 11 (2013), e79161.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. You Tweet What You Eat: Studying Food Consumption Through Twitter

          Recommendations

          Comments

          Login options

          Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

          Sign in
          • Published in

            cover image ACM Conferences
            CHI '15: Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
            April 2015
            4290 pages
            ISBN:9781450331456
            DOI:10.1145/2702123

            Copyright © 2015 ACM

            Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

            Publisher

            Association for Computing Machinery

            New York, NY, United States

            Publication History

            • Published: 18 April 2015

            Permissions

            Request permissions about this article.

            Request Permissions

            Check for updates

            Qualifiers

            • research-article

            Acceptance Rates

            CHI '15 Paper Acceptance Rate486of2,120submissions,23%Overall Acceptance Rate6,199of26,314submissions,24%

            Upcoming Conference

            CHI '24
            CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
            May 11 - 16, 2024
            Honolulu , HI , USA

          PDF Format

          View or Download as a PDF file.

          PDF

          eReader

          View online with eReader.

          eReader