skip to main content
10.1145/2702123.2702325acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageschiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Managing Children's Online Identities: How Parents Decide what to Disclose about their Children Online

Published:18 April 2015Publication History

ABSTRACT

While extensive research has investigated the risks of children sharing their personal information online, little work has investigated the implications of parents sharing personal information about their children online. Drawing on 102 interviews with parents in the U.S., we investigate how parents decide what to disclose about their children on social network sites (SNSs). We find that mothers take on the responsibility of sharing content about their children more than fathers do. Fathers are more restrictive about sharing to broad and professional audiences and are concerned about sharing content that could be perceived as sexually suggestive. Both mothers and fathers work to leverage affordances of SNSs to limit oversharing. Building on prior work, we explore parental disclosure management, which describes how parents decide what to share about their children online. We also describe an emerging third shift of work that highlights the additional work parents take on to manage children's identities online. We conclude with theoretical and practical implications for designing SNSs to better support family life online.

References

  1. Ames, M., Eckles, D., Naaman, M., Spasojevic, M., and Van House, N. Requirements for mobile photoware. In Proc. Personal and Ubiq. Comp. 14, 2 (2010), 95--109. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Ammari, T., Schoenebeck, S.Y., and Morris, M.R. Accessing Social Support and Overcoming Judgment on Social Media among Parents of Children with Special Needs. In Proc. ICWSM, AAAI, (2014).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Balaam, M., Robertson, J., Say, R., et al. Motherhood and HCI. CHI Workshop, (2013). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Bartel Sheehan, K. An investigation of gender differences in on-line privacy concerns and resultant behaviors. J. of Int. Marketing 13, 4 (1999), 24--38.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Bartholomew, M.K., Schoppe-Sullivan, S.J., Glassman, M., Kamp Dush, C.M., and Sullivan, J.M. New Parents' Facebook Use at the Transition to Parenthood. Family Relations 61, 3 (2012), 455--469.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. Besmer, A. and Richter Lipford, H. Moving beyond untagging: photo privacy in a tagged world. In Proc. CHI '10, ACM (2010), 1563--1572. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Boyd, D., Hargittai, E., Schultz, J., and Palfrey, J. Why parents help their children lie to Facebook about age: Unintended consequences of the 'Children's Online Privacy Protection Act'. First Monday 16, 11 (2011).Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. Brush, A.J.B., Inkpen, K.M., and Tee, K. SPARCS: exploring sharing suggestions to enhance family connectedness. In Proc. CSCW, ACM (2008), 629--638. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Cherlin, A. The Marriage-Go-Round: The State of Marriage and the Family in America Today. Knopf, 2009.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Egelman, S., Brush, AJ, & Inkpen, K. Family Accounts: A new paradigm for user accounts within the home environment. In Proc. CSCW, ACM (2008), 669--678. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Ellison, N.B., Steinfield, C., and Lampe, C. Connection strategies: Social capital implications of Facebookenabled communication practices. New Media & Society 13, 6 (2011), 873--892.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. Eriksson, H. and Salzmann-Erikson, M. Supporting a caring fatherhood in cyberspace -- an analysis of communication about caring within an online forum for fathers. Scand. J. of Caring Sci. 27, 1 (2013), 63--69.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. Fletcher, R. and StGeorge, J. Heading Into FatherhoodNervously: Support for Fathering From Online Dads. Qual. Health Res. 21, 8 (2011), 1101--1114.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  14. Gibson, J. The theory of affordances. Hilldale, 1977.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Gibson, L. and Hanson, V.L. Digital motherhood: how does technology help new mothers? In Proc. CHI 2013, ACM (2013), 313--322. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Hochschild, A.R. and Machung, A. The Second Shift: Working Parents and the Revolution at Home. Viking, 1989.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Hogan, B. The presentation of self in the age of social media: Distinguishing performances and exhibitions online. Bull. of Sci., Tech. & Soc. 30, 6 (2010), 377--386.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Hoy, M.G. and Milne, G. Gender Differences in Privacy-Related Measures for Young Adult Facebook Users. J. of Interactive Advertising 10, 2 (2010), pp. 28--45.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  19. Hsieh, H.-F. and Shannon, S.E. Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qualitative Health Research 15, 9 (2005), 1277--1288.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  20. Kim Parker and Wendy Wang. Modern Parenthood. Pew Research, 2013.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. Lampinen, A., Lehtinen, V., Lehmuskallio, A., and Tamminen, S. We're in it together: interpersonal management of disclosure in social network services. In Proc. CHI '11, ACM (2011), 3217--3226. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. Lincoln, Y.S. and Guba, E.G. Designing a naturalistic inquiry. Naturalistic inquiry, (1985), 221--249.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. Litt, E. Knock, Knock. Who's There? The Imagined Audience. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media 56, 3 (2012), 330--345.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  24. Livingstone, S. and Helsper, E. Parental Mediation of Children's Internet Use. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media 52, 4 (2008), 581--599.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  25. Livingstone, S. and Helsper, E. Balancing opportunities and risks in teenagers' use of the internet: the role of online skills and internet self-efficacy. New Media & Society 12, 2 (2010), 309--329.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  26. Madden, M. Privacy management on social media sites. Pew Research Center, 2012.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. Mazmanian, M. and Erickson, I. The Product of Availability: Understanding the Economic Underpinnings of Constant Connectivity. In Proc, CHI, ACM (2014), 763--772. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  28. Mickelson, K.D. Seeking social support: parents in electronic support groups. In S. Kiesler, ed., Culture of the Internet. LEA, 1997, 157--178.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  29. Miller, A.D. and Edwards, W.K. Give and Take: A Study of Consumer Photo-sharing Culture and Practice. In Proc. CHI 2007, ACM (2007), 347--356. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  30. Morris, M.R. Social Networking Site Use by Mothers of Young Children. In Proc. CSCW 2014, ACM (2014) 1272--1282. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  31. Nelson, M.K. Parenting Out of Control: Anxious Parents in Uncertain Times. NYU Press, 2010.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  32. Neustaedter, C., Yarosh, S., and Brush, A.J. Designing for families. In CHI EA 2009, ACM, 2009, 2735--2738. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  33. Norman, D. The Design of Everyday Things. Doubleday, New York, 1990. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  34. Norman, D.A. Affordance, Conventions, and Design. interactions 6, 3 (1999), 38--43. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  35. Pauwels, L. A private visual practice going public? Social functions and sociological research opportunities of Web-based family photography. Visual Studies 23, 1 (2008), 34--49.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  36. Petronio, S. Boundaries of Privacy: Dialectics of Disclosure. SUNY Press, 2002.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  37. Petronio, S. Communication privacy management theory: What do we know about family privacy regulation? Journal of Family Theory & Review 2, 3 (2010), 175--196.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  38. Rose, G. Family photographs and domestic spacings: a case study. Trans. of the Institute of British Geographers 28, 1 (2003), 5--18.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  39. Sarkadi, A. and Bremberg, S. Socially unbiased parenting support on the Internet: a cross-sectional study of users of a large Swedish parenting website. Child care health and development 31, 1 (2005), 43--52.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  40. Sarvas, D. and Frohlich, P.. The Future of Domestic Photography. Springer London, 2011, 139--177.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  41. Schoenebeck, S.Y. The Secret Life of Online Moms: Anonymity and Disinhibition on YouBeMom.com. In Proc. ICWSM 2013, AAAI (2013).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  42. Sengupta, S. Sharing, With a Safety Net. The New York Times, 2013. http://www.nytimes.com/2013/09/20/technology/billprovides-reset-button-for-youngsters-online-posts.html.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  43. Smith, Aaron. 6 new facts about Facebook. Pew Research Center. http://www.pewresearch.org/facttank/2014/02/03/6-new-facts-about-facebook/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  44. Streitfeld, D. European Court Lets Users Erase Records on Web. The New York Times, 2014. http://www.nytimes.com/2014/05/14/technology/google -should-erase-web-links-to-some-personal-data-europeshighest-court-says.html.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  45. Thomas, D.R. A General Inductive Approach for Analyzing Qualitative Evaluation Data. American Journal of Evaluation 27, 2 (2006), 237--246.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  46. Uski, S. and Lampinen, A. Social norms and selfpresentation on social network sites: Profile work in action. New Media & Soc., (2014), 1461444814543164.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  47. Vespa, J., Lewis, J.M., and Kreider, R.M. America's Families and Living Arrangements: 2012. U.S. Bureau of the Census, 2013.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  48. Vitak, J. and Kim, J. "You Can't Block People Offline": Examining How Facebook's Affordances Shape the Disclosure Process. In Proc. CSCW, ACM (2014), 461--474. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  49. Wang, Y., Norcie, G., Komanduri, S., Acquisti, A., Leon, P.G., and Cranor, L.F. "I Regretted the Minute I Pressed Share": A Qualitative Study of Regrets on Facebook. In Proc. SOUPS, ACM (2011), 10:1--10:16. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  50. Yardi, S. and Bruckman, A. Social and Technical Challenges in Parenting Teens' Social Media Use. In Proc. CHI, ACM, (2011), 3237--3246. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  51. Yarosh, S., Chew, Y.C., and Abowd, G.D. Supporting Parent-Child Communication in Divorced Families. Int'l J. of Human Comp. Studies 27, 2 (2009), 192--203. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  52. Zhang, Y. and Wildemuth, B. Qualitative analysis of content. Applications of social research methods to questions in info. and library science, (2009), 308--319.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  53. Zhao, X., Schwanda Sosik, V., and Cosley, D. It's Complicated: How Romantic Partners Use Facebook. In Proc. CHI '12, ACM (2012), 771--780. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  54. Zhao, Y., Liu, J., Tang, J., and Zhu, Q. Conceptualizing perceived affordances in social media interaction design. Aslib Proceedings 65, 3 (2013), 289--303.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Index Terms

  1. Managing Children's Online Identities: How Parents Decide what to Disclose about their Children Online

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      CHI '15: Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
      April 2015
      4290 pages
      ISBN:9781450331456
      DOI:10.1145/2702123

      Copyright © 2015 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 18 April 2015

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

      Acceptance Rates

      CHI '15 Paper Acceptance Rate486of2,120submissions,23%Overall Acceptance Rate6,199of26,314submissions,24%

      Upcoming Conference

      CHI '24
      CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
      May 11 - 16, 2024
      Honolulu , HI , USA

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader