skip to main content
10.1145/2702123.2702491acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageschiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Solutionism, the Game: Design Fictions for Positive Aging

Authors Info & Claims
Published:18 April 2015Publication History

ABSTRACT

This paper reports a qualitative study of thriving older people and illustrates the findings with design fiction. Design research has been criticized as "solutionist" i.e. solving problems that don't exist or providing "quick fixes" for complex social, political and environmental problems. We respond to this critique by presenting a "solutionist" board game used to generate design concepts. Players are given data cards and technology dice, they move around the board by pitching concepts that would support positive aging. We argue that framing concept design as a solutionist game explicitly foregrounds play, irony and the limitations of technological intervention. Three of the game concepts are presented as design fictions in the form of advertisements for products and services that do not exist. The paper argues that design fiction can help create a space for design beyond solutionism.

References

  1. AgeUK (2014) Later Life in the United Kingdom. http://www.ageuk.org.uk/Documents/ENGB/Factsheets/Later_Life_UK_factsheet.pdf?dtrk=trueGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Baltes P., & Baltes M., (1990). Successful aging: perspectives from the behavioral sciences. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. Bardzell, J., and Bardzell, S. (2013). What is "critical" about critical design? Proc. of CHI'2013. ACM: Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Bardzell J., Bardzell S., and Stolterman E., (2014). Reading critical designs: supporting reasoned interpretations of critical design. In Proc. of (CHI '14). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Bleecker, J.( 2009). "Design Fiction: A Short Essay on Design, Science, Fact and Fiction". webeditionpdfGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Bowling, A. and Dieppe, P. (2005). "What is successful aging and who should define it?" British Medical Journal. 331 (7531): 1548--1551.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. Blythe M. (2014) Research through design fiction: narrative in real and imaginary abstracts. In Proc of (CHI '14). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 703--712 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Callow S., (2012) Charles Dickens and the Great Theatre of the World.. Harper pressGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Charmaz, K. (2006) Constructing Grounded Theory. Sage, London, 2006.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Csikszentmihalyi M. (2014) Flow and the Foundations of Positive Psychology: The Collected Works of Mihaly Csikszentmihalyi. Springer.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. Dourish, P. (2006) Implications for design. In Proc. CHI '06, ACM , 541--550. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Dourish, P. & Bell, G. (2013). "Resistance is futile": Reading science fiction alongside ubiquitous computing. Personal Ubiq. Comput., Springer-Verlag, May Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Dunne A., and Raby F. (2013). Speculative Everything: Design, Fiction, and Social Dreaming. The MIT Press. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Eagleton, T. (1996) Literary Theory (2nd ed.). Wiley Blackwell, Hoboken, NJ,Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Ehrenreich B., (2010) Bright-sided: How Positive Thinking is Undermining America, Picador USA.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Furniss D., Blandford A., and Curzon P.. (2011). Confessions from a grounded theory PhD: experiences and lessons learnt. In Proc of (CHI '11). ACM Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Gaver W. (2012) What Should We Expect from Research Through Design. CHI 2012 pp 937--946 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. Gaver , W., Beaver, J., and Benford, S. (2003) Ambiguity as a resource for design. In Proc. CHI '03, ACM (2003), 233--240. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. Gaver, W., Boucher, A., Pennington, S. and Walker, B. (2004). Cultural probes and the value of uncertainty. Interactions, 6 (5), 2004, 53--56. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. Gilliam T. (2014) http://www.sfx.co.uk/2014/03/14/thezero-theorem-terry-gilliam-interview/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. Glaser, B. and Strauss, A. (1967) Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research. Aldine Publishing Company, Chicago, 1967.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. Gottman J and Silver N (2000) The Seven Principles for Making Marriage Work. An Onion PaperbackGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. Halskov, K. and Daslgaard, P. (2006) Inspiration Card Workshops. In Proc. DIS '06, ACM Press (2006), 2--11. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. Kirman B., Linehan C., Lawson S., and O'Hara D., (2013) CHI and the Future Robot Enslavement of Humankind: a retrospective. In Proc of CHI'13 ACM Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. Independent. The. The Only Gay (Retirement home) in the village. 31.6.2013Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. Linehan C., Kirman B., Reeves S., Blythe M., Tanenbaum J., Desjardins A., and Wakkary R., (2014). Alternate endings: using fiction to explore design futures. In Proc of CHI '14 ACM Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  27. Lucero, A. and Arrasvuori, J. (2010) PLEX Cards: A Source of Inspiration When Designing for Playfulness. In Proc. Fun and Games '10, ACM Press (2010), 28--37. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  28. Latour B. (2013) From Aggregation to Navigation. A few Challenges for Social Theory. CHI 13 Keynote address. Paris. 2003Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  29. Markussen T., and Knutz E. (2013). The poetics of design fiction. In Proc of DPPI '13. ACM Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  30. Marshall K., Thieme A., Wallace J., Vines J., Wood G., and Balaam M., (2014) Proc of DIS 14 Vancouver.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  31. Morozov E. (2013) To Save Everything Click Here: Technology, Solutionism and the Urge to Fix Problems That Don't Exist. Allen Lane Penguin Books.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  32. Oliver, C. 2008. Retirement Migration. Paradoxes of Ageing. New York: RoutledgeGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  33. Phelan E., Anderson L., Lacroix A., Larson E. (2004) Older adults' views of "successful aging"-how do they compare with researchers' definitions? J Am Geriatr Soc;52: 211--6Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  34. Robson C. (2002) Real World Research. Blackwell Publishing, Oxford.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  35. Rule A. and Levine D., (2014) International Art English. http://canopycanopycanopy.com/contents/international_ art_englishGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  36. Seligman M.E.P. (2002) Authentic Happiness: Using the New Positive Psychology to Realise Your Potential for Lasting Fulfillment Simon and SchusterGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  37. Seligman M.E.P. (2011) Flourish: A Visionary New Understanding and Well Being. Nichoals Brealey PublishingGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  38. Sterling B. (2005) Shaping Things. MIT Press. Cambridge MassachusettsGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  39. Sterling B. (2009) Design Fictions. Interactions. Vol 16. Issue 3. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  40. Sterling B. (2013) Patently untrue: fleshy defibrillators and synchronised baseball are changing the future. Wired (2013, Oct. 11).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  41. Strauss, A., Corbin, J., (1990): Basics Of Qualitative Research: Grounded Theory Procedures And Techniques. London, Sage.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  42. Steane J. (2014) The Principles and Processes of Interactive Design. Bloomsbury.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  43. Tanenbaum, J Tanenbaum K., and Wakkary R. (2012). Steampunk as design fiction. In Proc of CHI '12. ACM, New York, NY, USA, 1583--1592 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  44. Thieme, A., Balaam, M., Wallace, J., Coyle, D. and Lindley, S. Designing wellbeing. Proc. DIS '12. ACM (2012), 789--790. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  45. Thulesius H., (2005) Grounded Theory. Wikipedia. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Grounded_theoryGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  46. Vines J., Blythe M., Lindsay S., Dunphy P., Monk A., and Olivier, P. (2012). Questionable concepts: critique as resource for designing with eighty somethings. In Proc of CHI '12. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  47. Wakkary R., Desjardins A., Hauser S., and Maestri L. (2013). A sustainable design fiction: Green practices. TOCHI. Volume 20 Issue 4, September 2013 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Solutionism, the Game: Design Fictions for Positive Aging

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      CHI '15: Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
      April 2015
      4290 pages
      ISBN:9781450331456
      DOI:10.1145/2702123

      Copyright © 2015 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 18 April 2015

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

      Acceptance Rates

      CHI '15 Paper Acceptance Rate486of2,120submissions,23%Overall Acceptance Rate6,199of26,314submissions,24%

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader