skip to main content
research-article

Computing Education in Korea—Current Issues and Endeavors

Authors Info & Claims
Published:30 April 2015Publication History
Skip Abstract Section

Abstract

Computer education has been provided for a long period of time in Korea. Starting as a vocational program, the content of computer education for students evolved to include content on computer literacy, Information Communication Technology (ICT) literacy, and brand-new computer science. While a new curriculum related to computer science was established in 2007, the range of computer education being provided in Korean schools has been repeatedly reduced. To identify the cause of this recent phenomenon, we review the computer education environment using the Darmstadt model, including educational systems, curricula, and teaching environments. Then we examine what factors affected the decline of computer education. The major causes of failure are found to be the absence of policy and a comprehensive evaluation method. These causes have led to a reduction in the selection ratio of computer-related subjects and in the number of students taking computer classes. Based on this understanding, we bring some fundamental message for establishing robust computer science education.

References

  1. Seong-Hun Ahn. 2011. Necessity and way to legislate an information technology education promotion law for improvement of national competitiveness. Journal of the Korean Association of Information Education 15, 2 (2011), 209--217.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Seong-Hun Ahn. 2014. Study on the way of improving computer education in elementary and secondary schools. The Korea Contents Society 14, 2 (2014), 535--543. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5392/JKCA.2014.14.02.535Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. Sang Jin An, Young Min Seo, and Young Jun Lee. 2012. Prepare smart education: Furnishing educational materials. In World Conference on Educational Multimedia, Hypermedia and Telecommunications 2012, 1 (2012), 1649--1654.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Marina U. Bers, Elizabeth R. Kazakoff, and Amanda Sullivan. 2014. Computational thinking and tinkering: Exploration of an early childhood robotics curriculum. Computers & Education 72 (2014), 145--157.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. Jeong Won Choi, Eun Kyung Lee, and Young Jun Lee. 2013. Studying the possibility of puzzle based learning for informatics gifted elementary student education. Journal of the Korea Association of Computer Education 16, 5 (2013), 9--16.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Ji Young Hong, Jae Yeol Jeong, and Jae Hyeok Choe. 2009. A study on teacher awareness of information education of the revised 2007 middle school curriculum and support plans on the basis of middle school in Busan metropolitan city. In Proceedings of the Korean Association of Computer Education 13, 2 (2009), 77--82.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Peter Hubwieser, Michal Armoni, Torsten Brinda, Valentina Dagiene, Ira Diethelm, Michail N. Giannakos, Maria Knobelsdorf, Johannes Magenheim, Roland Mittermeir, and Sigrid Schubert. 2011. Computer science/informatics in secondary education. In Proceedings of the 16th Annual Conference Reports on Innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education-Working Group Reports. ACM, 19--38. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Gwo-Jen Hwang, Chun-Ming Hung, and Nian-Shing Chen. 2014. Improving learning achievements, motivations and problem-solving skills through a peer assessment-based game development approach. Educational Technology Research and Development 62, 2 (2014), 129--145.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. Hyun Seok Jeon. 2010. The Effect of Unplugged Algorithm Learning on Gifted and Talented Students’ Academic Achievement. Master's thesis. Korea National University of Education, Choengju-si, Korea.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Boon-im Jeong and Wae-shik Moon. 2006. A method on educational use of robot for enhancement of problem-solving ability. Journal of the Korean Association of Information Education 10, 3 (2006), 341--351.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Mi Yeoun Jeoung, Eun Kyung Lee, and Young Jun Lee. 2008. The effects of algorithm learning with Squeak Etoys on middle school students’ problem solving ability. The Journal of Korean Industrial Education Association 33, 2 (2008), 170--191.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Elizabeth R. Kazakoff, Amanda Sullivan, and Marina U. Bers. 2013. The effect of a classroom-based intensive robotics and programming workshop on sequencing ability in early childhood. Early Childhood Education Journal 41, 4 (2013), 245--255.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. Ee-gyong Kim. 2007. The quality and qualifications of the teaching force in the Republic of Korea In A Comparative Study of Teacher Preparation and Qualifications in Six Nations. Consortium for Policy Research in Education.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Hyeonjin Kim, Hyungshin Choi, Jeonghye Han, and Hyo-Jeong So. 2012a. Enhancing teachers’ ICT capacity for the 21st century learning environment: Three cases of teacher education in Korea. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology 28, 6 (2012), 965--982.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  15. Jin-Dong Kim and Gwon-Woo Yang. 2010. The effect of algorithm learning in real life case on logical thinking ability. Journal of the Korean Association of Information Education 14, 4 (2010), 555--560.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Jackie Hee-Young Kim and Hye-Yoon Jung. 2010. South Korean digital textbook project. Computers in the Schools 27, 3--4 (2010), 247--265.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Jung Il Kim, Young Min Seo, and Young Jun Lee. 2012b. Application of unplugged learning method for intellectual disability students’ informatics education. Journal of the Korea Society of Computer and Information 17, 9 (2012), 189--196.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  18. Kyeong-Ho Kim, Young-Kwon Bae, and In-Hwan Yu. 2007. Development and application of Hangul converter of robot programming language based on RCX. Journal of the Korean Association of Information Education 11, 4 (2007), 461--470.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Soojin Kim, Eui-nam Jin, Hyun-Kyung Kim, Myung-Jin Lee, Ji Hyun Park, and Yoon Kyeong Ahn. 2012c. International Computer and Information Literacy Study: A Technical Report of ICILS 2013 Field Trial. Research Reports from Korea Institute for Curriculum and Evaluation.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Yong Dae Kim, Gil Su Choi, and Jong Yun Lee. 2012d. Analysis of creative problem solving literacy in problem-solving methods and procedures parts presented in informatics textbooks in middle schools. The Journal of Korean Association of Computer Education 15, 1 (2012), 1--11.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. Korea Education and Research Information Service. 2001. Adapting Education to the Information Age. Retrieved from http://english.keris.or.kr/whitepaper/WhitePaper_eng_2001.pdf.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. Korea Foundation for the Advancement of Science and Creativity. 2014. Survey report: Software education in primary and secondary schools. Unpublished raw data.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. Korea Institute for Curriculum and Evaluation. 2013. The application result of college scholastic ability test. Press release. Retrieved from http://suneung.re.kr/board.do?boardConfigNo=57&menuNo==230&action==view&boardNo==23402.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. Eun Jung Kwon. 2008. The Effect of Algorithm Concept Learning by Plays on Learning Motivation and Achievement. Master's thesis. Korea National University of Education, Choengju-si, Korea.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. Eun Kyung Lee. 2009. A Robot Programming Teaching and Learning Model to Enhance Computational Thinking Ability. Doctoral dissertation, Korea National University of Education, Choengju-si, Korea.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. Jin Young Lee, Jeong Beom Son, and Tae Wuk Lee. 2009. An effect of the programming learning using robot on attitude toward computer learning and computer in practical arts education. Journal of Korean Practical Arts Education 15, 3 (2009), 89--108.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  27. Young Jun Lee and Eun Kyung Lee. 2008. The effect of a robot based programming learning on learners’ creative problem solving potential. The Journal of Korean Industrial Education Association 33, 2 (2008), 120--136.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  28. Young Jun Lee, Eun Kyung Lee, Young Sik Kim, and Ji Sun Kim. 2012. The Evaluation Research on Gifted Education Continuity. Research Report. Korea Foundation for the Advancement of Science and Creativity.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  29. Hee-Chan Lew. 2008. Some characteristics of the Korean national curriculum and its revision process. In Mathematics Curriculum in Pacific Rim Countries: China, Japan, Korea, and Singapore, 37--71.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  30. Ministry of Education and Human Resources Development. 2005. Revised ICT Education Guidelines for Elementary and Secondary Schools.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  31. NTTP Informatics Curriculum Study Task Force. 2012. Teacher training programs for informatics teachers. Gyeonggi Provincial Office of Education.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  32. Bens Pardamean. 2014. Enhancement of creativity through logo programming. American Journal of Applied Sciences 11, 4 (2014), 528--533.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  33. Chan-Seok Park, Mihye Kim, and Kwan-Hee Yoo. 2012. Design and implementation of a problem-based digital textbook. International Journal of Software Engineering and Its Applications 6, 4 (2012), 213--222. Retrieved from http://www.sersc.org/journals/IJSEIA/vol6_no4_2012/20.pdf.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  34. Jae Hyeong Park, Jeong Won Choi, and Young Jun Lee. 2012. The status of informatics gifted education in Korea. In Proceedings of World Conference on Educational Multimedia, Hypermedia and Telecommunications, 2660--2664.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  35. Chung Gyu Ryu and Lee Chul-Hyun. 2012. Effects that Scratch programming has on creative problem-solving for gifted elementary students. Journal of Korean Practical Arts Education 25, 1 (2012), 149--169.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  36. Eunmi Shin and Hyeoncheol Kim. 2002. The current status and improvement of “computer” curriculum at general high school. Korea Information Processing Society Review 9, 5 (2002), 26--34.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  37. Jeong-Beom Song, Soeng-Hwan Cho, and Tae-Wuk Lee. 2008. The effect of learning scratch programming on students’ motivation and problem solving ability. Journal of the Korean Association of Information Education 12, 3 (2008), 323--332.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  38. Jae-shin Song, Seongwoo Choi, Moon-sub Ban, and Hye-jin Eom. 1998. Development of a Teachers’ and Students’ Information Literacy Licensing System in the Republic of Korea. Research paper. Korea Education and Research Information Service.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  39. Hyeong Eob Suh. 2007. The effects on improving creativity with a PBL-based robot education program-case of a science high school. Journal of Engineering Education Research 10, 4 (2007), 93--122.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  40. Allen Tucker, Fadi Deek, Jill Jones, Dennis McCowan, Chris Stephenson, and Anita Verno. ACM K--12 Task Force 2003. A Model Curriculum for K-12 Computer Science. Final Report of the ACM K-12 Task Force Curriculum Committee. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  41. Gwon-Woo Yang. 2010. The effect of scratch on learning motivation and academic achievement for programming education. Journal of the Korean Association of Information Education 14, 4 (2012), 547--553.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  42. Seung Wook Yoo, Yong Chul Yeum, Yong Kim, Seung Eun Cha, Jong Hye Kim, Hye Sun Jang, Sook Kyong Choi, Hwan Cheol Lee, Dai Young Kwon, Hee Seop Han, Eun Mi Shin, Jae Shin Song, Jong Eun Park, and Won Gyu Lee. 2006. Development of an integrated informatics curriculum for K-12 in Korea. In Informatics Education: The Bridge between Using and Understanding Computers, Roland Mittermeir (Ed.), Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Vol. 4226. Springer, 199--208. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/11915355-19.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Computing Education in Korea—Current Issues and Endeavors

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in

    Full Access

    • Published in

      cover image ACM Transactions on Computing Education
      ACM Transactions on Computing Education  Volume 15, Issue 2
      Special Issue II on Computer Science Education in K-12 Schools
      May 2015
      142 pages
      EISSN:1946-6226
      DOI:10.1145/2767124
      Issue’s Table of Contents

      Copyright © 2015 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 30 April 2015
      • Revised: 1 December 2014
      • Accepted: 1 December 2014
      • Received: 1 April 2013
      Published in toce Volume 15, Issue 2

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article
      • Research
      • Refereed

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader