Katrina Falkner
ABSTRACT
Despite increased attention from Universities and Industry, the low representation of female students in Computer Science undergraduate degrees remains a major issue. Recognising this issue, leading tech companies have established strong and committed diversity initiatives but have only reached up to 17\% female representation in their tech departments. The causes of the reduced attraction and retention of female students are varied and have been widely studied, advancing the understanding of why female students do not take up or leave Computer Science. However, few analyses look at the perceptions of the females that have stayed in the field. In this paper, we explore the viewpoints of female academics and postgraduate students in Computer Science with various undergraduate backgrounds and pathways into academia. Our analysis of their interviews shows the influence of family, exposure, culture, sexism and gendered thought on their perceptions of the field, and of themselves and their peers. We identify that perceptions of identity conflict and a lack of belonging to the discipline persist even for these high-performing professionals.
- Apple, Inc. Inclusion inspires innovation. https://www.apple.com/diversity/, 2015. Last accessed January 2015.Google Scholar
- A. Bandura. Self-efficacy. Wiley Online Library, 1994.Google Scholar
- A. Berglund and M. Wiggberg. Students learn cs in different ways: Insights from a empirical study. In Proceedings of iTiCSE'06, pages 265--269, 2006. Google ScholarDigital Library
- S. J. Ceci and W. M. Williams. Sex differences in math-intensive fields. Current Directions in Psychological Science, page 0963721410383241, 2010.Google Scholar
- S. Cheryan, V. C. Plaut, P. G. Davies, and C. M. Steele. Ambient belonging: how stereotypical cues impact gender participation in computer science. Journal of personality and social psychology, 97(6):1045, 2009.Google Scholar
- P. R. Clance and S. A. Imes. The imposter phenomenon in high achieving women: Dynamics and therapeutic intervention. Psychotherapy: Theory, Research & Practice, 15(3):241, 1978.Google Scholar
- J. S. Eccles, A. Wigfield, and U. Schiefele. Motivation to succeed. 1998.Google Scholar
- Facebook, Inc. Building a more diverse facebook. http://newsroom.fb.com/news/2014/06/building-a-more-diverse-facebook/, 2015. Last accessed January 2015.Google Scholar
- M. F. Fox. Women and men faculty in academic science and engineering: Social-organizational indicators and implications. American Behavioral Scientist, 53(7):997--1012, 2010.Google ScholarCross Ref
- H. K. Gediman. Imposture, inauthenticity, and feeling fraudulent. Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association, 1985.Google Scholar
- Google, Inc. Our workforce demographics. http://www.google.com.au/diversity/at-google.html\#tab=tech, 2015. Last accessed January 2015.Google Scholar
- S. A. Hewlett et al. The Athena factor: Reversing the brain drain in science, engineering, and technology. Harvard Business School Watertown, MA, 2008.Google Scholar
- L. Joy, N. M. Carter, H. M. Wagner, and S. Narayanan. The bottom line: Corporate performance and women-ôs representation on boards. Catalyst, 3, 2007.Google Scholar
- M. Klawe, T. Whitney, and C. Simard. Women in computing--take 2. Communications of the ACM, 52(2):68--76, 2009. Google ScholarDigital Library
- S. Lewis, C. Lang, and J. McKay. An inconvenient truth: The invisibility of women in ict. Australasian Journal of Information Systems, 15(1), 2008.Google ScholarCross Ref
- J. Margolis and A. Fisher. Unlocking the clubhouse: Women in computing. MIT press, 2003.Google Scholar
- I. Miliszewska, G. Barker, F. Henderson, and E. Sztendur. The issue of gender equity in computer science--what students say. Journal of Information Technology Education: Research, 5(1):107--120, 2006.Google ScholarCross Ref
- P. Moorman and E. Johnson. Still a stranger here: Attitudes among secondary school students towards computer science. In ACM SIGCSE Bulletin, volume 35, pages 193--197. ACM, 2003. Google ScholarDigital Library
- B. Nelson. The data on diversity. Communications of the ACM, 57(11):86--95, 2014. Google ScholarDigital Library
- C. on Maximizing the Potential of Women in Academic Science, E. (US), C. on Science, and P. P. (US). Beyond bias and barriers: fulfilling the potential of women in academic science and engineering. Natl Academy Pr, 2007.Google Scholar
- M. R. Roberts, T. J. McGill, and P. N. Hyland. Attrition from australian ict degrees: why women leave. In Proceedings of the Fourteenth Australasian Computing Education Conference-Volume 123, pages 15--24. Australian Computer Society, Inc., 2012. Google ScholarDigital Library
- M. Sandelowski. Sample size in qualitative research. Research in Nursing & Health, 18(2):179--183, 1995.Google ScholarCross Ref
- E. Seymour and N. M. Hewitt. Talking about leaving: Why undergraduates leave the sciences, volume 12. Westview Press Boulder, CO, 1997.Google Scholar
- C. M. Steele. Whistling vivaldi: And other clues to how stereotypes affect us (issues of our time) author: Claude m. steele, publisher. 2010.Google Scholar
- E. M. Trauth, S. Nielsen, and L. Von Hellens. Explaining the it gender gap: Australian stories for the new millennium. Journal of research and practice in information technology, 35(1):7--20, 2003.Google Scholar
- V. Valian. Why so slow?: The advancement of women. MIT press, 1999.Google ScholarCross Ref
- M. Volman and E. van Eck. Gender equity and information technology in education: The second decade. Review of Educational Research, 71(4):613--634, 2001.Google ScholarCross Ref
- A. W. Woolley, C. F. Chabris, A. Pentland, N. Hashmi, and T. W. Malone. Evidence for a collective intelligence factor in the performance of human groups. Science, 330(6004):686--688, 2010.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Y. Zhang and B. Wildemuth. Application of social research methods to questions in information and library science, chapter Qualitative analysis of content, pages 308--319. Westport Conn: Libraries Unlimited, 2009.Google Scholar
- S. Zweben and B. Bizot. 2013 taulbee survey. COMPUTING, 26(5), 2014.Google Scholar
Index Terms
- Gender Gap in Academia: Perceptions of Female Computer Science Academics
Recommendations
How Early Does the CS Gender Gap Emerge?: A Study of Collaborative Problem Solving in 5th Grade Computer Science
SIGCSE '16: Proceedings of the 47th ACM Technical Symposium on Computing Science EducationElementary computer science has gained increasing attention within the computer science education research community. We have only recently begun to explore the many unanswered questions about how young students learn computer science, how they interact ...
Closing the Gender and Underrepresented Minority Gap in CS: UTeach Computer Science Principles AP Assessment Results (Abstract Only)
SIGCSE '18: Proceedings of the 49th ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science EducationGender and racial/ethnic participation gaps in computing is a well-documented problem motivating several interventions aimed at attracting and retaining women and underrepresented students (Black or African American, Latinx, and Native American students)...
Computer Science Educators Stack Exchange: Perceptions of Equity and Gender Diversity in Computer Science
SIGCSE '19: Proceedings of the 50th ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science EducationThe representation of women in computer science (CS) is low in the United States and has been declining over the past few decades. Prior research has demonstrated that educators play an important role in increasing gender diversity. Not much, however, ...
Comments