skip to main content
10.1145/2735711.2735817acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesahConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

EcoBears: augmenting everyday appliances with symbolic and peripheral feedback

Published:09 March 2015Publication History

ABSTRACT

This paper introduces the EcoBears concept that aims to augment household appliances with functional and aesthetic features to promote their use and longevity of use to prevent their disposal. The EcoBears also aim to support the communication of environmental issues in the home setting. The initial design and implementation of the EcoBears that consist of two bear modules (a mother and her cub) is presented as well as the preliminary concept validation and lessons learned to be considered for future work.

References

  1. Barreto, M., Karapanos, E., and Nunes, N. Why don't families get along with eco-feedback technologies?: A longitudinal inquiry. In Proc. CHItaly '13, ACM (New York, NY, USA, 2013), 16:1--16:4. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Blevis, E. Sustainable interaction design: Invention & disposal, renewal & reuse. In Proc. CHI '07, ACM (New York, NY, USA, 2007), 503--512. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Entwistle, J. M., Rasmussen, M. K., Verdezoto, N., Brewer, R., and Andersen, M. S. Beyond the Individual: The Contextual Wheel of Practice as a Research Framework for Sustainable HCI. In Proc. CHI'15 - {To appear}, ACM (2015). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Froehlich, J., et al. The design of eco-feedback technology. In Proc. CHI '10, ACM (2010), 1999--2008. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Hallgrimssom, B. Prototyping and modelmaking for product design. Portfolio skills. Laurence King Publ., London, 2012.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Horn, M. S., et al. Learning sustainability: Families, learning, and next-generation eco-feedback technology. In Proc. IDC '11, ACM (2011), 161--164. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Pousman, Z., and Stasko, J. A taxonomy of ambient information systems: Four patterns of design. In Proc. AVI '06, ACM (2006), 67--74. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Snow, S., Buys, L., Roe, P., and Brereton, M. Curiosity to cupboard: Self reported disengagement with energy use feedback over time. In Proc. OzCHI '13, ACM (New York, NY, USA, 2013), 245--254. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. EcoBears: augmenting everyday appliances with symbolic and peripheral feedback

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Other conferences
      AH '15: Proceedings of the 6th Augmented Human International Conference
      March 2015
      241 pages
      ISBN:9781450333498
      DOI:10.1145/2735711
      • General Chairs:
      • Suranga Nanayakkara,
      • Ellen Yi-Luen Do,
      • Program Chairs:
      • Jun Rekimoto,
      • Jochen Huber,
      • Bing-Yu Chen

      Copyright © 2015 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 9 March 2015

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

      Acceptance Rates

      Overall Acceptance Rate121of306submissions,40%

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader