skip to main content
10.1145/2735960.2735970acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesiccpsConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Fully bayesian learning and spatial reasoning with flexible human sensor networks

Published:14 April 2015Publication History

ABSTRACT

This work considers the challenging problem of simultaneous modeling and fusion of 'soft data' generated by a network of 'human sensors' for spatial state estimation tasks, such as lost target search or large area surveillance. Human sensors can opportunistically provide useful information to constrain difficult state estimation problems, but are imperfect information sources whose reliability cannot be easily determined in advance. Formal observation likelihood models are derived for flexible sketch-based observations, but are found to lead to analytically intractable statistical dependencies between unknown sensor parameters and spatial states of interest that cannot adequately characterized by simple point estimates. Hierarchical Bayesian models and centralized inference strategies based on Gibbs sampling are proposed to address these issues, especially in cases of sparse, noisy, ambiguous and conflicting soft data. This leads to an automatic online calibration procedure for human sensor networks, as well as conservative spatial state posteriors that naturally account for model uncertainties. Experimental outdoor target search results with real spatial human sensor data (obtained via networked mobile graphical sketch interfaces) demonstrate the proposed methodology.

References

  1. J. A. Adams, C. M. Humphrey, M. A. Goodrich, J. L. Cooper, and B. S. Morse. Cognitive Task Analysis for Developing Unmanned Aerial Vehicle Wilderness Search Support. Journal of Cognitive Engineering and Decision Making, 3(1): 1--26, 2009.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. N. Ahmed, E. Sample, and M. Campbell. Bayesian multicategorical soft data fusion for human-robot collaboration. IEEE Trans. on Robotics, 29: 189--206, 2013. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. M. Allahbakhsh, B. Benatallah, A. Ignjatovic, H. Motahari-Nezhad, E. Bertino, and S. Dustdar. Quality control in crowdsourcing systems: Issues and directions. IEEE Internet Computing, 17(2): 76--81, 2013. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. N. Atanasov, J. Le Ny, and G. Pappas. Distributed Algorithms for Stochastic Source Seeking with Mobile Robot Networks. ASME Journal of Dynamic Systems, Measurement, and Control, 2014.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. T. Bailey, S. Julier, and G. Agamennoni. On conservative fusion of information with unknown non-gaussian dependence. In 2012 Int'l Conf. on Information Fusion (FUSION 2012), pages 1876--1883. IEEE, 2012.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. D. W. Casbeer, D. B. Kingston, R. W. Beard, and T. W. McLain. Cooperative forest fire surveillance using a team of small unmanned air vehicles. Int'l Journal of Systems Science, 37(6): 351--360, 2006.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. W. R. Gilks, N. Best, and K. Tan. Adaptive rejection metropolis sampling within Gibbs sampling. Applied Statistics, pages 455--472, 1995.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. W. R. Gilks and P. Wild. Adaptive rejection sampling for Gibbs sampling. Applied Statistics, pages 337--348, 1992.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. M. A. Goodrich, B. S. Morse, C. Engh, J. L. Cooper, and J. A. Adams. Towards using Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs) in Wilderness Search and Rescue. Interaction Studies, 10(3): 453--478, 2009.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. D. Hall and J. Jordan. Human-Centered Information Fusion. Artech House, Boston, MA, 2010. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. F. W. Heger and S. Singh. Sliding Autonomy for Complex Coordinated Multi-Robot Tasks: Analysis & Experiments. In Robotics Science and Systems, 2006.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. G. Hoffmann and C. D. Tomlin. Mobile Sensor Network Control Using Mutual Information Methods and Particle Filters. IEEE Trans. on Automatic Control, 55(1): 32--47, 2010.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. M. A. Hsieh, A. Cowley, V. Kumar, and C. J. Taylor. Maintaining Network Connectivity and Performance in Robot Teams. 25(1): 111--131, 2008. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. E. Kamar, S. Hacker, and E. Horvitz. Combining human and machine intelligence in large-scale crowdsourcing. In Proceedings of the 11th Int'l Conf. on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems-Volume 1, pages 467--474. Int'l Foundation for Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems, 2012. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. T. Kaupp, B. Douillard, F. Ramos, A. Makarenko, and B. Upcroft. Shared environment representation for a human-robot team performing information fusion. Journal of Field Robotics, 24(11): 911--942, 2007. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. T. Kaupp, A. Makaerenko, F. Ramos, B. Upcroft, S. Williams, and H. Durrant-Whyte. Adaptive human sensor model in sensor networks. In 2005 Int'l Conference on Information Fusion (FUSION 2005), volume 1, pages 748--755, 2005.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. D. Kingston. Intruder Tracking Using UAV Teams and Ground Sensor Networks. In German Aviation and Aerospace Congress (DLRK 2012), Berlin, Germany, 2012. German Society for Aeronautics and Astronautics (DGLR).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. S. Maskell. A Bayesian approach to fusing uncertain, imprecise, and conflicting information. Information Fusion, 2008(9): 259--277, 2008. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. B. Park, A. Johannson, and D. Nicholson. Crowdsourcing soft data for improved urban situation assessment. In 2013 Int'l Conf. on Information Fusion (FUSION 2013), pages 669--675. IEEE, 2013.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. G. Pickard, W. Pan, I. Rahwan, M. Cebrian, R. Crane, A. Madan, and A. Pentland. Time-critical social mobilization. Science, 334(6055): 509--512, 2011.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  21. C. Robert and G. Casella. Monte Carlo Statistical Methods. Springer, New York, 2nd edition, 2004. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  22. E. Sample, N. Ahmed, and M. Campbell. An experimental evaluation of Bayesian soft human sensor fusion in robotic systems. In 2012 AIAA Guidance, Navigation and Control Conf., August 2012.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. T. Sheridan. Humans and Automation: System Design and Research Issues. Wiley, Santa Monica, CA, 2002. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. B. W. Silverman. Density estimation for statistics and data analysis, volume 26. CRC press, 1986.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. D. Wang, L. Kaplan, H. Le, and T. Abdelzaher. On truth discovery in social sensing: A maximum likelihood estimation approach. In Proc. of the 11th Int'l Conf. on Information Proc. in Sensor Networks, pages 233--244. ACM, 2012. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  26. H. Wang, K. Sycara, A. Kolling, N. Brooks, S. Owens, S. Abedin, P. Scerri, P.-j. Lee, S.-Y. Chien, and M. Lewis. Scalable target detection for large robot teams. In Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction - HRI '11, page 363, New York, New York, USA, 2011. ACM Press. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Fully bayesian learning and spatial reasoning with flexible human sensor networks

          Recommendations

          Comments

          Login options

          Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

          Sign in
          • Published in

            cover image ACM Conferences
            ICCPS '15: Proceedings of the ACM/IEEE Sixth International Conference on Cyber-Physical Systems
            April 2015
            269 pages
            ISBN:9781450334556
            DOI:10.1145/2735960

            Copyright © 2015 ACM

            Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

            Publisher

            Association for Computing Machinery

            New York, NY, United States

            Publication History

            • Published: 14 April 2015

            Permissions

            Request permissions about this article.

            Request Permissions

            Check for updates

            Qualifiers

            • research-article

            Acceptance Rates

            ICCPS '15 Paper Acceptance Rate25of91submissions,27%Overall Acceptance Rate25of91submissions,27%

          PDF Format

          View or Download as a PDF file.

          PDF

          eReader

          View online with eReader.

          eReader