skip to main content
10.1145/2739482.2768440acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesgeccoConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

An Experimental Analysis of the Performance of SideChain Packing Algorithms

Published:11 July 2015Publication History

ABSTRACT

This paper presents a brief description of the protein side chain packing problem (PSCPP) and a performance assessment, on this problem, of three state-of-the-art algorithms: SCWRL4, OPUS-Rota, and CIS-RR. In order to perform a fair comparison, the algorithms are evaluated on three data sets, two of them were previously proposed in the literature and a set of 723 protein structures proposed here. Experimental results show that the achieved accuracy when evaluating the side chain's first torsion angle (χ1) is of approximately 86% and around 69% for the first and the second torsion angles (χ1+2), for all methods. Although all the algorithms achieve similar accuracies, SCWRL4 requires on average, less computation effort than the others. We highlight relevant aspects that need to be considered in order to verify whether or not this 86% is a theoretical upper bound for the algorithms' performance as well as what might become a promising direction to follow in case an improvement is possible.

References

  1. T. Akutsu. Np-hardness results for protein side-chain packing. Genome Informatics, 8:180--186, 1997.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. A. Canutescu, A. Shelenkov, and R. Dunbrack. A graph-theory algorithm for rapid protein side-chain prediction. Protein Science: A Publication of the Protein Society, 12(9):2001--2014, sep 2003. PMID: 12930999.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. Y. Cao, L. Song, Z. Miao, Y. Hu, L. Tian, and T. Jiang. Improved side-chain modeling by coupling clash-detection guided iterative search with rotamer relaxation. Bioinformatics, jan 2011. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. R. Das. 'Four small puzzles that Rosetta doesn't solve'. PLOS One, 6(5):e20044, 2011.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. J. Desmet, M. Maeyer, B. Hazes, and I. Lasters. The dead-end elimination theorem and its use in side-chain positioning. Nature, 356:539--542, 1992.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. R. Dunbrack and F. Cohen. Bayesian statistical analysis of protein side-chain rotamer preferences. Protein Science, 6:1661--1681, 1997.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. R. Dunbrack and M. Karplus. Backbone-dependent rotamer library for proteins. application to side-chain prediction. Journal of Molecular Biology, 230:543--574, 1993.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. P. Francis-Lyon and P. Koehl. Protein side-chain modeling with a protein-dependent optimized rotamer library. Proteins: Structure, Function, and Bioinformatics, 82(9):2000--2017, 2014.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. P. Gainza, K. Roberts, and B. Donald. 'Protein Design Using Continuous Rotamers'. PLOS Computational Biology, (8):1--15, 2012.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. T. Jain, D. Cerutti, and J. McCammon. Configurational-bias sampling technique for predicting side-chain conformations in proteins. Protein Science: A Publication of the Protein Society, 15(9):2029--2039, sep 2006. PMID: 16943441.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. G. Krivov, M. Shapovalov, and R. Dunbrack. Improved prediction of protein side-chain conformations with SCWRL4. Proteins, 27(6):785--790, may 2009. PMID: 19603484.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Z. Li, Y. Yang, J. Zhan, L. Dai, and Y. Zhou. Energy functions in de novo protein design: Current challenges and future prospects. Annual Review of Biophysics, 42:315--335, 2013.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. S. Liang and N. Grishin. Side-chain modeling with an optimized scoring function. Protein Science, 11(2):322--331, 2002.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  14. S. Liang, D. Zheng, C. Zhang, and D. Standley. Fast and accurate prediction of protein side-chain conformations. Bioinformatics, 27(20):2913--2914, 2011. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. S. Liang, Y. Zhou, N. Grishin, and D. Standley. Protein side chain modeling with orientation-dependent atomic force fields derived by series expansions. Journal of Computacional Chemistry, 32(8):1680--1686, jun 2011.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  16. M. Lu, A. Dousis, and J. Ma. OPUS-Rota: a fast and accurate method for side-chain modeling. Protein Science, 17(9):1576--1585, 2008.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  17. Z. Miao, Y. Cao, and T. Jiang. RASP: rapid modeling of protein side chain conformations. Bioinformatics, 27(22):3117--3122, sep 2011. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. K. Nagata, A. Randall, and P. Baldi. Sidepro: A novel machine learning approach for the fast and accurate prediction of side-chain conformations. Proteins: Structure, Function, and Bioinformatics, 80(1):142--153, 2012.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. L. X. Peterson, X. Kang, and D. Kihara. Assessment of protein side-chain conformation prediction methods in different residue environments. Proteins: Structure, Function, and Bioinformatics, 82(9):1971--1984, 2014.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. R. Peterson, P. Dutton, and A. Wand. Improved side-chain prediction accuracy using an ab initio potential energy function and a very large rotamer library. Protein Science: A Publication of the Protein Society, 13(3):735--751, mar 2004. PMID: 14978310.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  21. M. Shapovalov and R. Dunbrack. A smoothed backbone-dependent rotamer library for proteins derived from adaptive kernel density estimates and regressions. Bioinformatics, 19(22):844--858, jun 2011.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. H. Venselaar, E. Krieger, and G. Vriend. Homology modeling. Structural Bioinformatics, pages 715--732, 2009.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. P. Widera, J. M. Garibaldi, and N. Krasnogor. Gp challenge: Evolving energy function for protein structure prediction. Genetic Programming and Evolvable Machines, 11(1):61--88, Mar. 2010. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. Z. Xianga and B. Honig. 'Extending the accuracy limits of prediction for side-chain conformations'. Journal of Molecular Biology, 311(2):421--430, 2001.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Index Terms

  1. An Experimental Analysis of the Performance of SideChain Packing Algorithms

        Recommendations

        Comments

        Login options

        Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

        Sign in
        • Published in

          cover image ACM Conferences
          GECCO Companion '15: Proceedings of the Companion Publication of the 2015 Annual Conference on Genetic and Evolutionary Computation
          July 2015
          1568 pages
          ISBN:9781450334884
          DOI:10.1145/2739482

          Copyright © 2015 ACM

          Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

          Publisher

          Association for Computing Machinery

          New York, NY, United States

          Publication History

          • Published: 11 July 2015

          Permissions

          Request permissions about this article.

          Request Permissions

          Check for updates

          Qualifiers

          • research-article

          Acceptance Rates

          Overall Acceptance Rate1,669of4,410submissions,38%

          Upcoming Conference

          GECCO '24
          Genetic and Evolutionary Computation Conference
          July 14 - 18, 2024
          Melbourne , VIC , Australia

        PDF Format

        View or Download as a PDF file.

        PDF

        eReader

        View online with eReader.

        eReader