skip to main content
10.1145/2744769.2747936acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesdacConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Models, abstractions, and architectures: the missing links in cyber-physical systems

Published:07 June 2015Publication History

ABSTRACT

Bridging disparate realms of physical and cyber system components requires models and methods that enable rapid evaluation of design alternatives in cyber-physical systems (CPS). The diverse intellectual traditions of physical and mathematical sciences makes this task exceptionally hard. This paper seeks to explore potential solutions by examining specific examples of CPS applications in automobiles and smart buildings. Both smart buildings and automobiles are complex systems with embedded knowledge across several domains. We present our experiences with development of CPS applications to illustrate the challenges that arise when expertise across domains is integrated into the system, and show that creation of models, abstractions, and architectures that address these challenges are key to next generation CPS applications.

References

  1. gbXML Schema. http://www.gbxml.org/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Johnson Controls Metasys. http://www.johnsoncontrols.com/metasys.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Project Haystack. http://project-haystack.org/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. SkySpark by SkyFoundry. http://www.skyfoundry.com/skyspark/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Tridium Niagara AX. http://www.niagaraax.com/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. United States Environmental Protection Agency "Sources of Greenhouse Gas Emissions". www.epa.gov., 2014.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Y. Agarwal, R. Gupta, D. Komaki, and T. Weng. BuildingDepot: An extensible and distributed architecture for building data storage, access and sharing. In Proceedings of the ACM Workshop on Embedded Sensing Systems for Energy-Efficiency in Buildings, pages 64--71. ACM, 2012. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. M. A. Al Faruque and F. Ahourai. A Model-Based Design of Cyber-Physical Energy Systems. 19th Asia and South Pacific Design Automation Conference (ASP-DAC), pages 97--104, 2014.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. P. Arjunan, N. Batra, H. Choi, A. Singh, P. Singh, and M. B. Srivastava. SensorAct: A privacy and security aware federated middleware for building management. In Proceedings of the ACM Workshop on Embedded Sensing Systems for Energy-Efficiency in Buildings, pages 80--87. ACM, 2012. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. B. Balaji, H. Teraoka, R. Gupta, and Y. Agarwal. ZonePAC: Zonal power estimation and control via hvac metering and occupant feedback. In Proceedings of the ACM Workshop on Embedded Systems For Energy-Efficient Buildings, pages 1--8. ACM, 2013. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. B. Balaji, J. Xu, A. Nwokafor, R. Gupta, and Y. Agarwal. Sentinel: Occupancy based HVAC actuation using existing WiFi infrastructure within commercial buildings. In Proceedings of the 11th ACM Conference on Embedded Networked Sensor Systems, page 17. ACM, 2013. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. J.-M. Bohli, C. Sorge, and O. Ugus. A privacy model for smart metering. In Communications Workshops (ICC), 2010 IEEE International Conference on, pages 1--5. IEEE, 2010.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. M. Boucher and D. Houlihan. System design: new product development for mechatronics. Aberdeen Group, Boston, 2008.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. S. T. Bushby. BACnet™: A standard communication infrastructure for intelligent buildings. Automation in Construction, 6(5):529--540, 1997.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  15. A. Canedo, M. A. A. Faruque, and J. Richter. Multi-disciplinary integrated design automation tool for automotive cyber-physical systems. Design Automation and Test in Europe (DATE'14), pages 1--2, 2014. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. A. Canedo, E. Schwarzenbach, and M. A. Al Faruque. Context-sensitive synthesis of executable functional models of cyber-physical systems. In Cyber-Physical Systems (ICCPS), 2013 ACM/IEEE International Conference on, pages 99--108. IEEE, 2013. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. A. Canedo, J. Wan, and M. A. A. Faruque. Functional modeling compiler for system-level design of automotive cyber-physical systems. International Conference on Computer-Aided Design (ICCAD'14), 2014. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. S. Chakraborty, M. Lukasiewycz, C. Buckl, S. Fahmy, P. Leteinturier, and H. Adlkofer. Embedded Systems and Software Challenges in Electric Vehicles. DATE'12 Proceedings of the Conference on Design, Automation & Test in Europe, pages 424--429, 2012. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. C. Christensen, R. Anderson, S. Horowitz, A. Courtney, and J. Spencer. BEopt software for building energy optimization: features and capabilities. National Renewable Energy Laboratory, 2006.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  20. D. B. Crawley, L. K. Lawrie, F. C. Winkelmann, W. F. Buhl, Y. J. Huang, C. O. Pedersen, R. K. Strand, R. J. Liesen, D. E. Fisher, M. J. Witte, et al. EnergyPlus: creating a new-generation building energy simulation program. Energy and buildings, 33(4):319--331, 2001.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  21. R. Curtis, B. Birdsall, W. Buhl, E. Erdem, J. Eto, J. Hirsch, K. Olson, and F. Winkelmann. The DOE-2 building energy use analysis program. Lawrence Berkeley Laboratory, LBL-18046, 1984.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. H. Dai, X. Wei, Z. Sun, J. Wang, and W. Gu. Online cell SOC estimation of Li-ion battery packs using a dual time-scale Kalman filtering for EV applications. Applied Energy, 95:227--237, 2012.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  23. S. Darby et al. The effectiveness of feedback on energy consumption. A Review for DEFRA of the Literature on Metering, Billing and direct Displays, 486:2006, 2006.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. S. Dawson-Haggerty, A. Krioukov, J. Taneja, S. Karandikar, G. Fierro, N. Kitaev, and D. E. Culler. Boss: Building operating system services. In NSDI, volume 13, pages 443--458, 2013. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. P. Derler, E. A. Lee, and A. S. Vincentelli. Modeling cyber--physical systems. Proceedings of the IEEE, 100(1):13--28, 2012.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  26. D. Dumbacher and S. R. Davis. Building operations efficiencies into NASAŠs Ares I crew launch vehicle design. In 54th Joint JANNAF Propulsion Conference, 2007.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. M. S. Erden, H. Komoto, T. J. van Beek, V. D'Amelio, E. Echavarria, and T. Tomiyama. A review of function modeling: approaches and applications. Artificial Intelligence for Engineering Design, Analysis and Manufacturing, 22(02):147--169, 2008. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  28. N. GCR. Cost analysis of inadequate interoperability in the us capital facilities industry. National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST), 2004.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  29. B. P. Haynes. The impact of office comfort on productivity. Journal of Facilities Management, 6(1):37--51, 2008.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  30. R. Khire, F. Leonardi, P. Quimby, and S. Sarkar. A novel human machine interface for advanced building controls and diagnostics. 2014.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  31. H. Lee, J. S. Choi, and R. Elmasri. A conflict resolution architecture for the comfort of occupants in intelligent office. 2008.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  32. D. Lehrer and J. Vasudev. Visualizing energy information in commercial buildings: A study of tools, expert users, and building occupants. 2011.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  33. T. Liebich, Y. Adachi, J. Forester, J. Hyvarinen, K. Karstila, and J. Wix. Industry Foundation Classes IFC2x, 2006.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  34. D. Loy. Fundamentals of LonWorks/EIA-709 Networks: ANSI/EIA-709 Protocol Standard (LonTalk). The Industrial Communications Technology, 2005.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  35. M. Lukasiewycz and S. Steinhorst. System Architecture and Software Design for Electric Vehicles. DAC'13 Proceedings of the Design Automation Conference, pages 1--6, 2013. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  36. J. F. Nicol and M. A. Humphreys. A stochastic approach to thermal comfort--occupant behavior and energy use in buildings. ASHRAE transactions, 110(2), 2004.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  37. L. Northrop, P. Feiler, R. P. Gabriel, J. Goodenough, R. Linger, T. Longstaff, R. Kazman, M. Klein, D. Schmidt, K. Sullivan, et al. Ultra-large-scale systems: The software challenge of the future. Technical report, DTIC Document, 2006.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  38. J. Plume and J. Mitchell. Collaborative design using a shared IFC building model -- Learning from experience. Automation in Construction, 16(1):28--36, 2007.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  39. Siemens. Apogee building automation. 2008.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  40. H. Teraoka, B. Balaji, R. Zhang, A. Nwokafor, B. Narayanaswamy, and Y. Agarwal. BuildingSherlock: Fault Management Framework for HVAC Systems in Commercial Buildings. Technical Report, CSE, UCSD, 2014.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  41. S. Uckun. Meta ii: Formal co-verification of correctness of large-scale cyber-physical systems during design. Palo Alto Research Center, Technical Report, 2011.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  42. K. Vatanparwar and M. A. Al Faruque. Battery Lifetime-Aware Automotive Climate Control for Electric Vehicles. DAC'15 Proceedings of the Design Automation Conference, 2015. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  43. J. Wan, A. Canedo, and M. A. A. Faruque. Functional model-based design methodology for automotive cyber-physical systems. IEEE Systems Journal (ISJ), 2014.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  44. M. Wetter, P. Haves, and T. S. Nouidui. Building controls virtual test bed. Computer software available at https://gaia.lbl.gov/bcvtb, 2013.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  45. F. Xiao and S. Wang. Progress and methodologies of lifecycle commissioning of HVAC systems to enhance building sustainability. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 13(5):1144--1149, 2009.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Index Terms

  1. Models, abstractions, and architectures: the missing links in cyber-physical systems

        Recommendations

        Comments

        Login options

        Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

        Sign in
        • Published in

          cover image ACM Conferences
          DAC '15: Proceedings of the 52nd Annual Design Automation Conference
          June 2015
          1204 pages
          ISBN:9781450335201
          DOI:10.1145/2744769

          Copyright © 2015 ACM

          Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

          Publisher

          Association for Computing Machinery

          New York, NY, United States

          Publication History

          • Published: 7 June 2015

          Permissions

          Request permissions about this article.

          Request Permissions

          Check for updates

          Qualifiers

          • research-article

          Acceptance Rates

          Overall Acceptance Rate1,770of5,499submissions,32%

          Upcoming Conference

          DAC '24
          61st ACM/IEEE Design Automation Conference
          June 23 - 27, 2024
          San Francisco , CA , USA

        PDF Format

        View or Download as a PDF file.

        PDF

        eReader

        View online with eReader.

        eReader