Abstract
Viral marketing is a powerful tool for online advertising and sales because it exploits the influence people have on one another. While this marketing technique has been beneficial for advertisers, it has not been shown how the social network providers such as Facebook and Twitter can benefit from it. In this paper, we initiate the study of sponsored viral marketing where a social network provider that has complete knowledge of its network is hired by several advertisers to provide viral marketing. Each advertiser has its own advertising budget and a fixed amount they are willing to pay for each user that adopts their product or shares their ads. The goal of the social network provider is to gain the most revenue from the advertisers. Since the products or ads from different advertisers may compete with each other in getting users' attention, and advertisers pay differently per share and have different budgets, it is very important that the social network providers start the "seeds" of the viral marketing of each product at the right places in order to gain the most benefit.
We study both when advertisers have limited and unlimited budgets. In the unlimited budget setting, we give a tight approximation algorithm for the above task: we present a polynomial-time O(log n)-approximation algorithm for maximizing the expected revenue, where n is the number of nodes (i.e., users) in the social network, and show that no polynomial-time O(log1-ε n)-approximation algorithm exists, unless NP ⊆ DTIME}(npoly log n). In the limited budget setting, we show that it is hopeless to solve the problem (even approximately): unless P = NP, there is no polynomial-time O(n1-ε)-approximation algorithm. We perform experiments on several data sets to compare our provable algorithms to several heuristic baselines.
- D. Agrawal, C. Budak, and A. El Abbadi. Information diffusion in social networks: observing and affecting what society cares about. In CIKM, pages 2609--2610, 2011. Google ScholarDigital Library
- D. Agrawal, C. Budak, and A. El Abbadi. Information diffusion in social networks: Observing and influencing societal interests. PVLDB, 4(12):1512--1513, 2011.Google ScholarDigital Library
- A. Anagnostopoulos, R. Kumar, and M. Mahdian. Influence and correlation in social networks. In KDD'08. Google ScholarDigital Library
- L. Backstrom, D. Huttenlocher, J. Kleinberg, and X. Lan. Group formation in large social networks: membership, growth, and evolution. In KDD '06. Google ScholarDigital Library
- S. Bharathi, D. Kempe, and M. Salek. Competitive influence maximization in social networks. In WINE, 2007. Google ScholarDigital Library
- A. Borodin, M. Braverman, B. Lucier, and J. Oren. Strategyproof mechanisms for competitive influence in networks. In WWW, 2013. Google ScholarDigital Library
- A. Borodin, Y. Filmus, and J. Oren. Threshold models for competitive influence in social networks. In WINE, 2010. Google ScholarDigital Library
- C. Budak, D. Agrawal, and A. El Abbadi. Limiting the spread of misinformation in social networks. In WWW, pages 665--674, 2011. Google ScholarDigital Library
- G. Călinescu, C. Chekuri, M. Pál, and J. Vondrák. Maximizing a monotone submodular function subject to a matroid constraint. SIAM J. Comput., 40(6):1740--1766, 2011. Also in IPCO'07 and STOC'08. Google ScholarDigital Library
- T. Carnes, C. Nagarajan, S. M. Wild, and A. van Zuylen. Maximizing influence in a competitive social network: a follower's perspective. In ICEC, pages 351--360, 2007. Google ScholarDigital Library
- P. Chalermsook, J. Chuzhoy, S. Kannan, and S. Khanna. Improved hardness results for profit maximization pricing problems with unlimited supply. In APPROX-RANDOM, pages 73--84, 2012.Google ScholarCross Ref
- P. Chalermsook, B. Laekhanukit, and D. Nanongkai. Graph products revisited: Tight approximation hardness of induced matching, poset dimension, and more. In SODA, 2013. Google ScholarDigital Library
- S. Datta, A. Majumder, and N. Shrivastava. Viral marketing for multiple products. In ICDM, 2010. Google ScholarDigital Library
- P. S. Dodds and D. J. Watts. A generalized model of social and biological contagion. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 2005.Google ScholarCross Ref
- P. Domingos and M. Richardson. Mining the network value of customers. In KDD, pages 57--66, 2001. Google ScholarDigital Library
- J. Edwards. Chart: Facebook's sponsored stories are way more effective than display ads. Business Insider, 2012.Google Scholar
- A. Efrati. Google expected to surpass facebook in display-ad sales. The Wall Street Journal, 2012.Google Scholar
- S. Fiegerman. Google will overtake facebook in u.s. display ad revenue this year {report}. Mashable Business, 2012.Google Scholar
- M. Fisher, G. Nemhauser, and L. Wolsey. An analysis of approximations for maximizing submodular set functions-II. In M. Balinski and A. Hoffman, editors, Polyhedral Combinatorics, volume 8 of Mathematical Programming Studies, pages 73--87. Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 1978.Google ScholarCross Ref
- M. Gladwell. The Tipping Point: How Little Things Can Make a Big Difference. 2002.Google Scholar
- S. Goldberg and Z. Liu. The diffusion of networking technology. In SODA, 2013. Google ScholarDigital Library
- J. Goldenberg, B. Libai, and E. Muller. Talk of the Network: A Complex Systems Look at the Underlying Process of Word-of-Mouth. Marketing Letters, 2001.Google Scholar
- S. Goyal and M. Kearns. Competitive contagion in networks. In STOC, pages 759--774, 2012. Google ScholarDigital Library
- M. Granovetter. Threshold Models of Collective Behavior. The American Journal of Sociology, 1978.Google ScholarCross Ref
- J. D. Hartline, V. S. Mirrokni, and M. Sundararajan. Optimal marketing strategies over social networks. In WWW, pages 189--198, 2008. Google ScholarDigital Library
- X. He, G. Song, W. Chen, and Q. Jiang. Influence blocking maximization in social networks under the competitive linear threshold model. In SDM, pages 463--474, 2012.Google ScholarCross Ref
- C.-C. Huang and Z. Svitkina. Donation center location problem. In FSTTCS, pages 227--238, 2009.Google Scholar
- D. Kempe, J. Kleinberg, and E. Tardos. Maximizing the spread of influence through a social network. In KDD'03. Google ScholarDigital Library
- J. Leskovec, L. A. Adamic, and B. A. Huberman. The dynamics of viral marketing. ACM Trans. Web, 2007. Google ScholarDigital Library
- M. E. J. Newman. Spread of epidemic disease on networks. Physical Review E, 2002.Google ScholarCross Ref
- M. Richardson and P. Domingos. Mining knowledge-sharing sites for viral marketing. In KDD, pages 61--70, 2002. Google ScholarDigital Library
- E. M. Rogers. Diffusion of Innovations. Simon and Schuster, 2003.Google Scholar
- M. Rogowsky. Will facebook generate more revenue than google? Quora, 2012.Google Scholar
- D. M. Romero, B. Meeder, and J. Kleinberg. Differences in the mechanics of information diffusion. In WWW '11. Google ScholarDigital Library
- S. Shirazipourazad, B. Bogard, H. Vachhani, A. Sen, and P. Horn. Influence propagation in adversarial setting: how to defeat competition with least amount of investment. In CIKM, 2012. Google ScholarDigital Library
- S. Simon and K. R. Apt. Choosing products in social networks. In WINE, 2012. Google ScholarDigital Library
- V. Tzoumas, C. Amanatidis, and E. Markakis. A game-theoretic analysis of a competitive diffusion process over social networks. In WINE, 2012. Google ScholarDigital Library
Index Terms
- Social Network Monetization via Sponsored Viral Marketing
Recommendations
Social Network Monetization via Sponsored Viral Marketing
SIGMETRICS '15: Proceedings of the 2015 ACM SIGMETRICS International Conference on Measurement and Modeling of Computer SystemsViral marketing is a powerful tool for online advertising and sales because it exploits the influence people have on one another. While this marketing technique has been beneficial for advertisers, it has not been shown how the social network providers ...
Approximation algorithms for pricing with negative network externalities
We study the problems of pricing an indivisible product to consumers who are embedded in a given social network. The goal is to maximize the revenue of the seller by the so-called iterative pricing that offers consumers a sequence of prices over time. ...
Sponsored Search Marketing: Dynamic Pricing and Advertising for an Online Retailer
Consider a retailer using sponsored search marketing together with dynamic pricing. The retailer's bid on a search keyword affects the retailer's rank among the search results. The higher the rank, the higher the customer traffic and the customers' ...
Comments