skip to main content
research-article

Social Network Monetization via Sponsored Viral Marketing

Published:15 June 2015Publication History
Skip Abstract Section

Abstract

Viral marketing is a powerful tool for online advertising and sales because it exploits the influence people have on one another. While this marketing technique has been beneficial for advertisers, it has not been shown how the social network providers such as Facebook and Twitter can benefit from it. In this paper, we initiate the study of sponsored viral marketing where a social network provider that has complete knowledge of its network is hired by several advertisers to provide viral marketing. Each advertiser has its own advertising budget and a fixed amount they are willing to pay for each user that adopts their product or shares their ads. The goal of the social network provider is to gain the most revenue from the advertisers. Since the products or ads from different advertisers may compete with each other in getting users' attention, and advertisers pay differently per share and have different budgets, it is very important that the social network providers start the "seeds" of the viral marketing of each product at the right places in order to gain the most benefit.

We study both when advertisers have limited and unlimited budgets. In the unlimited budget setting, we give a tight approximation algorithm for the above task: we present a polynomial-time O(log n)-approximation algorithm for maximizing the expected revenue, where n is the number of nodes (i.e., users) in the social network, and show that no polynomial-time O(log1-ε n)-approximation algorithm exists, unless NP ⊆ DTIME}(npoly log n). In the limited budget setting, we show that it is hopeless to solve the problem (even approximately): unless P = NP, there is no polynomial-time O(n1-ε)-approximation algorithm. We perform experiments on several data sets to compare our provable algorithms to several heuristic baselines.

References

  1. D. Agrawal, C. Budak, and A. El Abbadi. Information diffusion in social networks: observing and affecting what society cares about. In CIKM, pages 2609--2610, 2011. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. D. Agrawal, C. Budak, and A. El Abbadi. Information diffusion in social networks: Observing and influencing societal interests. PVLDB, 4(12):1512--1513, 2011.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. A. Anagnostopoulos, R. Kumar, and M. Mahdian. Influence and correlation in social networks. In KDD'08. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. L. Backstrom, D. Huttenlocher, J. Kleinberg, and X. Lan. Group formation in large social networks: membership, growth, and evolution. In KDD '06. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. S. Bharathi, D. Kempe, and M. Salek. Competitive influence maximization in social networks. In WINE, 2007. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. A. Borodin, M. Braverman, B. Lucier, and J. Oren. Strategyproof mechanisms for competitive influence in networks. In WWW, 2013. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. A. Borodin, Y. Filmus, and J. Oren. Threshold models for competitive influence in social networks. In WINE, 2010. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. C. Budak, D. Agrawal, and A. El Abbadi. Limiting the spread of misinformation in social networks. In WWW, pages 665--674, 2011. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. G. Călinescu, C. Chekuri, M. Pál, and J. Vondrák. Maximizing a monotone submodular function subject to a matroid constraint. SIAM J. Comput., 40(6):1740--1766, 2011. Also in IPCO'07 and STOC'08. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. T. Carnes, C. Nagarajan, S. M. Wild, and A. van Zuylen. Maximizing influence in a competitive social network: a follower's perspective. In ICEC, pages 351--360, 2007. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. P. Chalermsook, J. Chuzhoy, S. Kannan, and S. Khanna. Improved hardness results for profit maximization pricing problems with unlimited supply. In APPROX-RANDOM, pages 73--84, 2012.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. P. Chalermsook, B. Laekhanukit, and D. Nanongkai. Graph products revisited: Tight approximation hardness of induced matching, poset dimension, and more. In SODA, 2013. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. S. Datta, A. Majumder, and N. Shrivastava. Viral marketing for multiple products. In ICDM, 2010. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. P. S. Dodds and D. J. Watts. A generalized model of social and biological contagion. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 2005.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  15. P. Domingos and M. Richardson. Mining the network value of customers. In KDD, pages 57--66, 2001. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. J. Edwards. Chart: Facebook's sponsored stories are way more effective than display ads. Business Insider, 2012.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. A. Efrati. Google expected to surpass facebook in display-ad sales. The Wall Street Journal, 2012.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. S. Fiegerman. Google will overtake facebook in u.s. display ad revenue this year {report}. Mashable Business, 2012.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. M. Fisher, G. Nemhauser, and L. Wolsey. An analysis of approximations for maximizing submodular set functions-II. In M. Balinski and A. Hoffman, editors, Polyhedral Combinatorics, volume 8 of Mathematical Programming Studies, pages 73--87. Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 1978.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  20. M. Gladwell. The Tipping Point: How Little Things Can Make a Big Difference. 2002.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. S. Goldberg and Z. Liu. The diffusion of networking technology. In SODA, 2013. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. J. Goldenberg, B. Libai, and E. Muller. Talk of the Network: A Complex Systems Look at the Underlying Process of Word-of-Mouth. Marketing Letters, 2001.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. S. Goyal and M. Kearns. Competitive contagion in networks. In STOC, pages 759--774, 2012. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. M. Granovetter. Threshold Models of Collective Behavior. The American Journal of Sociology, 1978.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  25. J. D. Hartline, V. S. Mirrokni, and M. Sundararajan. Optimal marketing strategies over social networks. In WWW, pages 189--198, 2008. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  26. X. He, G. Song, W. Chen, and Q. Jiang. Influence blocking maximization in social networks under the competitive linear threshold model. In SDM, pages 463--474, 2012.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  27. C.-C. Huang and Z. Svitkina. Donation center location problem. In FSTTCS, pages 227--238, 2009.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  28. D. Kempe, J. Kleinberg, and E. Tardos. Maximizing the spread of influence through a social network. In KDD'03. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  29. J. Leskovec, L. A. Adamic, and B. A. Huberman. The dynamics of viral marketing. ACM Trans. Web, 2007. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  30. M. E. J. Newman. Spread of epidemic disease on networks. Physical Review E, 2002.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  31. M. Richardson and P. Domingos. Mining knowledge-sharing sites for viral marketing. In KDD, pages 61--70, 2002. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  32. E. M. Rogers. Diffusion of Innovations. Simon and Schuster, 2003.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  33. M. Rogowsky. Will facebook generate more revenue than google? Quora, 2012.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  34. D. M. Romero, B. Meeder, and J. Kleinberg. Differences in the mechanics of information diffusion. In WWW '11. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  35. S. Shirazipourazad, B. Bogard, H. Vachhani, A. Sen, and P. Horn. Influence propagation in adversarial setting: how to defeat competition with least amount of investment. In CIKM, 2012. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  36. S. Simon and K. R. Apt. Choosing products in social networks. In WINE, 2012. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  37. V. Tzoumas, C. Amanatidis, and E. Markakis. A game-theoretic analysis of a competitive diffusion process over social networks. In WINE, 2012. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Social Network Monetization via Sponsored Viral Marketing

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in

      Full Access

      • Published in

        cover image ACM SIGMETRICS Performance Evaluation Review
        ACM SIGMETRICS Performance Evaluation Review  Volume 43, Issue 1
        Performance evaluation review
        June 2015
        468 pages
        ISSN:0163-5999
        DOI:10.1145/2796314
        Issue’s Table of Contents
        • cover image ACM Conferences
          SIGMETRICS '15: Proceedings of the 2015 ACM SIGMETRICS International Conference on Measurement and Modeling of Computer Systems
          June 2015
          488 pages
          ISBN:9781450334860
          DOI:10.1145/2745844

        Copyright © 2015 ACM

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 15 June 2015

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • research-article

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader