skip to main content
10.1145/2746090.2746119acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesicailConference Proceedingsconference-collections
extended-abstract

Representation of an actual divorce dispute in the parenting plan support system

Published: 08 June 2015 Publication History

Abstract

This paper evaluates the Parenting Plan Support System, a partially implemented decision support system designed to help parents to draft an agreement concerning relations with their children after the divorce, against the background of a real-life case. The focus here is on knowledge representation issues and the functioning of the inference engine.

References

[1]
Aleven, V. 1997. Teaching case-based argumentation through a model and examples. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Pittsburgh Graduate Program in Intelligent Systems.
[2]
Araszkiewicz, M. 2014. Scientia Juris: A Missing Link in the Modelling of Statutory Reasoning. JURIX 2014. IOS Press, Amsterdam, 1--10.
[3]
Araszkiewicz, M., Łopatkiewicz, A. and Zienkiewicz, A. 2013a. Factor-Based Parent Plan Support System. In Proceedings of the 14th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law (ICAIL 2013, E. Francesconi and B. Verheij Eds.). ACM, New York, 171--175.
[4]
Araszkiewicz, M., Łopatkiewicz, A. and Zienkiewicz, A. 2013b. Parent Plan Support System -- Context, Functions and Knowledge Base. In Business Information Systems Workshops, Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing vol. 160, W. Abramowicz, Ed. Springer, Berlin, 160--171.
[5]
Ashley, K. Modeling legal argument: Reasoning with cases and hypotheticals. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
[6]
Bench-Capon, T. and Rissland, E. 2001. Back to the Future: Dimensions Revisited. JURIX 2001. IOS Press, Amsterdam, 41--50.
[7]
Lauritsen, M. 2015. On balance. Artificial Intelligence and Law 23 (1), 23--42.
[8]
Rissland, E. and Ashley, K. 2002. A note on dimensions and factors. Artificial Intelligence and Law 10, (1-3), 65--77.
[9]
Sartor, G. 2010. Doing justice to rights and values: teleological reasoning and proportionality. Artificial Intelligence and Law 18 (2), 175--215.
[10]
Zurek, T. and Araszkiewicz, M. 2013. Modeling teleological interpretation. In Proceedings of the 14th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law (ICAIL 2013, E. Francesconi and B. Verheij Eds.). ACM, New York, 160--168.

Cited By

View all
  • (2021)Current Research and Practice in Online Family Dispute ResolutionOnline Family Dispute Resolution10.1007/978-3-030-64645-5_3(37-62)Online publication date: 13-Jan-2021
  • (2018)Risk analysis and prediction in welfare institutions using a recommender systemAI & Society10.1007/s00146-017-0735-233:4(511-525)Online publication date: 1-Nov-2018
  • (2017)HYPO’S legacy: introduction to the virtual special issueArtificial Intelligence and Law10.1007/s10506-017-9201-125:2(205-250)Online publication date: 2-Jun-2017
  • Show More Cited By

Index Terms

  1. Representation of an actual divorce dispute in the parenting plan support system

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Information & Contributors

      Information

      Published In

      cover image ACM Other conferences
      ICAIL '15: Proceedings of the 15th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law
      June 2015
      246 pages
      ISBN:9781450335225
      DOI:10.1145/2746090
      • Conference Chair:
      • Ted Sichelman,
      • Program Chair:
      • Katie Atkinson
      Permission to make digital or hard copies of part or all of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for third-party components of this work must be honored. For all other uses, contact the Owner/Author.

      Sponsors

      • Center for IP Law & Markets: Center for Intellectual Property Law & Markets, University of San Diego School of Law
      • TrademarkNow: TrademarkNow
      • The International Association for Artificial Intelligence and Law
      • Davis Polk: Davis Polk & Wardwell LLP
      • Legal Robot: Legal Robot
      • Thomson Reuters: Thomson Reuters Corporation

      In-Cooperation

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      Published: 08 June 2015

      Check for updates

      Author Tags

      1. divorce
      2. factors
      3. inference engine
      4. knowledge representation
      5. parenting plan support system

      Qualifiers

      • Extended-abstract

      Funding Sources

      Conference

      ICAIL '15
      Sponsor:
      • Center for IP Law & Markets
      • TrademarkNow
      • Davis Polk
      • Legal Robot
      • Thomson Reuters

      Acceptance Rates

      ICAIL '15 Paper Acceptance Rate 30 of 58 submissions, 52%;
      Overall Acceptance Rate 69 of 169 submissions, 41%

      Contributors

      Other Metrics

      Bibliometrics & Citations

      Bibliometrics

      Article Metrics

      • Downloads (Last 12 months)4
      • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0
      Reflects downloads up to 01 Mar 2025

      Other Metrics

      Citations

      Cited By

      View all
      • (2021)Current Research and Practice in Online Family Dispute ResolutionOnline Family Dispute Resolution10.1007/978-3-030-64645-5_3(37-62)Online publication date: 13-Jan-2021
      • (2018)Risk analysis and prediction in welfare institutions using a recommender systemAI & Society10.1007/s00146-017-0735-233:4(511-525)Online publication date: 1-Nov-2018
      • (2017)HYPO’S legacy: introduction to the virtual special issueArtificial Intelligence and Law10.1007/s10506-017-9201-125:2(205-250)Online publication date: 2-Jun-2017
      • (2016)Accommodating changeArtificial Intelligence and Law10.1007/s10506-016-9190-524:4(409-427)Online publication date: 1-Dec-2016
      • (2016)A methodology for designing systems to reason with legal cases using Abstract Dialectical FrameworksArtificial Intelligence and Law10.1007/s10506-016-9178-124:1(1-49)Online publication date: 1-Mar-2016
      • (2015)Framing a Knowledge Base for a Legal Expert System Dealing with Indeterminate ConceptsThe Scientific World Journal10.1155/2015/9854252015:1Online publication date: Oct-2015

      View Options

      Login options

      View options

      PDF

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader

      Figures

      Tables

      Media

      Share

      Share

      Share this Publication link

      Share on social media