Dan Boyarski
Susan Harkness Regli
- 1.Anderson, R. C. (1972). How to construct achievement tests to assess comprehension. Review of Educational Research, 42(2), 145-170.Google Scholar
Cross Ref
- 2.Dillon, A_ (1992). Reading from paper vs. screens: A critical review of the empirical literature. Ergonomics, 35 (10), 1297- 1326.Google ScholarCross Ref
- 3.Gould, J. D. & Gfischkowsky, N., (1984). Doing the same work with hard copy and with cathode-ray tube (CRT) computer terminals. Human Factors, 26(3), 323-337.Google ScholarCross Ref
- 4.Gould, J. D., Alfaro, L., Barnes, V., Finn, R., Grischkowsky, N., & Minuto, A. (1987a). Reading is slower from CRT displays than from paper:. Attempts to isolate a single-variable explanation. Human Factors, 29(3), 269-299. Google ScholarDigital Library
- 5.Gould, L D., Alfaro, L., Finn, R., Haupt, B., & Minuto, A. (1987b). Reading from CRT displays can be as fast as reading from paper. Human Factors, 29(5), 497-517. Google ScholarDigital Library
- 6.Johnston, P. H. (1984). Assessment in reading. In P. D. Pearson (Ed.), Handbook of Reading Research (Vol I, pp. 147- 182). NY: Longman.Google Scholar
- 7.Mills, C. B. & Weldon, L. L (1987). Reading text from computer screens. A CM Computing Surveys, 19(4), 329-358. Google ScholarDigital Library
- 8.Muter, P., Latr6mouille, S. A., Treumiet, W. C. & Beam, P. (1982). Extended reading of continuous text on television screens. Human Factors, 24, 501-508.Google ScholarCross Ref
- 9.The Nelson-Denny Reading Test (1981). Chicago, IL: The Riverside Publishing Company.Google Scholar
- 10.Norman, K.L. (1991). The psychology of menu selection: Designing cognitive control at the human-computer interface. New Jersey: Ablex. Google ScholarDigital Library
- 11.Obome, D. J. & Holton, D. (1988). Reading from screen vs. paper', there is no difference. InL J. Man-Machine Studies, 28, 1- 9. Google ScholarDigital Library
- 12.Paterson, D. G. & Tinker, M. A. (1932a). Studies of typographical factors influencing speed of reading: X. Style of type face. Journal of Apptied Psychology, 16(6), 605-613.Google ScholarCross Ref
- 13.Paterson, D. G. & Tinker, M. A. (1932b). Studies of typographical factors influencing speed of reading: VIII. Space between lines or leading. Journal of Applied Psychology, 16(4), 388-397.Google ScholarCross Ref
- 14.Paterson, D. G. & Tinker, M. A. (1931). Studies of typographical factors influencing speed of reading: VI. Blacktype versus white type. Journal of Applied Psychology, 15(2), 241- 247.Google ScholarCross Ref
- 15.Paterson, D. (3. & Tinker, M. A. (1930). Studies of typographical factors influencing speed of reading: IV. Effect of practice on equivalence of test forms. Journal of Applied Psychology, 14(3), 211-217.Google ScholarCross Ref
- 16.Paterson, D. (3. & Tinker, M. A. (1929a). Studies of typographical factors influencing speeA of reading: HI. Length of line. Journal of Applied Psychology, 13(3), 205-219.Google ScholarCross Ref
- 17.Paterson, D. G. & Tinker, M. A. (1929b). Studies of typographical factors influencing speed of reading: II. Size of type. Journal of Applied Psychology, 13(2), 120-130.Google ScholarCross Ref
- 18.Poulton, E.C. (1955). Letter differentiation and rate of comprehension of reading. Journal of Applied Psychology, 49, 358- 362.Google ScholarCross Ref
- 19.Schneiderman, B. (1987). Designing the user interface: Effective strategies for human-computer interaction. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley. Google ScholarDigital Library
- 20.Tinker, M. A. (1947). The 7"mker speed of reading test. Minneapolis, MN: The University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
- 21.Tinker, M. A. & Paterson, D. G. (1936). Studies of typographical factors influencing speed of reading: XIIL Methodological considerations. Journal of Applied Psychology, 20, 132-145.Google ScholarCross Ref
- 22.Tinker, M. A. & Paterson, D. G. (1935). Studies of typographical factors influencing speed of read, g:. XI. Role of set in typographical studies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 19, 647- 651.Google ScholarCross Ref
- 23.Tinker, M. A. & Paterson, D. G. (1931a). Studies of typographical factors influencing speed of reading:. IX. Reductions in size of newspaper print. Journal of Applied Psychology, 16(5), 525-531.Google ScholarCross Ref
- 24.Tinker, M. A. & Paterson, D. G. (1931b). Studies of typographical factors influencing speed of reading: V1L Variations in color of print and background. Journal of Applied Psychology, 15(5), 471-479.Google ScholarCross Ref
- 25.Tinker, M. A. & Paterson, D. G. (1931c). Studies of typographical factors influencing speed of reading: V. Simultaneous variation of type size and line length. Journal of Applied Psychology, 15(1), 72-78.Google ScholarCross Ref
- 26.Tinker, M. A. & Paterson, D. G. (1928). influence of type form on speed of reading. Journal of Applied Psychology, 12(4), 359-368.Google ScholarCross Ref
- 27.Waller, R. (1991). Typography and discourse. In R. Barr, M. L. Kamil, P. B. Mosenthal, & P. D. Pearson (Eds.), Handbook of Reading Research (Vol K, pp. 341-380). NY: Longman.Google Scholar
Index Terms
- A study of fonts designed for screen display
Recommendations
Good fonts for dyslexia
ASSETS '13: Proceedings of the 15th International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and AccessibilityAround 10% of the people have dyslexia, a neurological disability that impairs a person's ability to read and write. There is evidence that the presentation of the text has a significant effect on a text's accessibility for people with dyslexia. However,...
The effects of font type and size on the legibility and reading time of online text by older adults
CHI EA '01: CHI '01 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing SystemsThis study examined passages containing two serif and sans serif fonts at 12 and 14-point sizes for differences in legibility, reading time, and general preference when read by an older population. A significant main effect of size was found for font ...
The Effect of Font Type on Screen Readability by People with Dyslexia
Around 10% of the people have dyslexia, a neurological disability that impairs a person’s ability to read and write. There is evidence that the presentation of the text has a significant effect on a text’s accessibility for people with dyslexia. However,...
Comments