skip to main content
10.1145/274644.274675acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageschiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
Article
Free Access

Quantifying the effect of user interface design features on cyberstore traffic and sales

Authors Info & Claims
Published:01 January 1998Publication History
First page image

References

  1. 1.Arnold, S. L; Ma, S.; Tigert, D. J. A comparative analysis of determinant attributes in retail store selection. Advances in Consumer Research, Association for Consumer Research, 5 (1977), 663- 667.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.Belsley, David A., Kuh, Edwin, and Welsch, Roy E., Regression Diagnostics: identifying Influential Data and Sources of Collinearity, John Wiley, New York, 1980Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.Berry, L. L The components of department store image: A theoretical and empirical analysis. Journal of Retailing, 45, 1 (Spring 1969), 3-20.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.Jarvenpaa, S. L. and Todd, P. A. Consumer reactions to electronic shopping on the World Wide Web. International Journal of Electronic Commerce, (1997), 1, 2, 59-88. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. 5.Glamour, September 1996, p 232.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.Lindquist, L D. Meaning of image. Journal of Retailing, 50, 4 (Winter 1974-1975), 29-38.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.Mason, Charlotte H. and Perreault, William D. Ir., Collineadty, Power and Interpretation of Multiple Regression Analysis, Journal of Marketing Research, Vol. 28 No. 3 (August 1991), p. 268-280.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. 8.May, E. G. Practical applications of recent retail image research. Journal of Retailing, 50, 4 (Winter 1974-1975), 15-20.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.Morris-Lee, L Push-pull marketing with magalogs. Direct Marketing, 56, 2 (June 1993), 23-26, 47.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.Nielsen, J. Usability Engineering. Cambridge, MA: Academic Press, 1993. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. 11.Poison, P. G. The consequences of consistent and inconsistent user interfaces, in: Guindon, R. (ed.). Cognitive Science and its Application for Human- Computer Interaction. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, 1988.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.Ridgon, J. Caught in the Web. Wall Street Journal, (June 17, 1996)R14.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.Sandberg, L Making the sale. Wall Street Journal, Qune 17, 1996)R6.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.Spiller, P. & Lohse, G.L. (forthcoming). A classification of Intemet retail stores. International Journal of Electronic Commerce, 2, 2. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. 15.White, Halbert, "A Heteroskedasticity-Consistent Covariance Matrix Estimator and a Direct Test for I-Ieteroskedasticity," Econometrica, Vol. 48 No. 4 (1980), p. 817-838Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Index Terms

  1. Quantifying the effect of user interface design features on cyberstore traffic and sales

          Recommendations

          Comments

          Login options

          Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

          Sign in

          PDF Format

          View or Download as a PDF file.

          PDF

          eReader

          View online with eReader.

          eReader