Michelle X. Zhou
Steven K. Feiner
- 1.E. Andre and T. Rist. The design of illustrated documents as a planning task. In M. Maybury, editor, Intelligent Multimedia Interfaces, chapter 4, pages 94-116. AAAI Press/The MIT Press, Menlo Park, CA, 1993. Google Scholar
Digital Library
- 2.J. Bexfin. Semiology of Graphics. Univ. of Wisconsin Press, Madison, WI, 1983. (trans. by WJ. Berg). Google ScholarDigital Library
- 3.S. Casner. A task-analytic approach to the automated design of graphic presentafions.ACM Trans. on Graphics, 10(2):I11-151, 1991. Google ScholarDigital Library
- 4.W. Cleveland and R. McGill. Graphical perception: Theory, experimentation, and application to the development of graphical methods. Journal of the American StatisticaI Association, 79:531-554, 1984.Google ScholarCross Ref
- 5.M. Dalai, S. Fe'mer, K. McKeox~, D. Jordan, B. Allen, and Y. alSafadi, h~_GIC: An exper~ental system for generating mnltimedia briefings about post-bypass patient status. In Proc. 1996AMIA Annual Fa//Syrup, pages 684-688, Washington, DC, October 26-30 1996.Google Scholar
- 6.E. Gol dsnfith. Research lnto IIIustration: An Approach and A Review. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1984.Google Scholar
- 7.B. Hunter, A. Ca'ismore, and P. Pearson. Visual displays in basal readers and social studies textbooks. In D. Willows and H. Houghton, editors, The Psychology of Illustration: InsuTzctional Issues, volume 2, chapter 5, pages 116-158. Springer-Verlag, New York, 1987.Google ScholarCross Ref
- 8.E. Ignatius, H. Senay, andJ. Favre. An intelligent system for task-specific visualization assistanr~. J. of V'a'ual Lang. and Computing, 5:321-338,1994.Google ScholarCross Ref
- 9.P. Johnson, H. Johnson, R. Waddington, and A. Shouls. Task-related lmowledge structures: Analysis, modelling, and application. In D. Jones and R. ~V'mder, editors, People and Computers IV, Proc. of British SIGHCI, pages 35--61. Cambridge University Press, 1988. Google ScholarDigital Library
- 10.P.R. Kellerand M. hi. Keller. lr~sua/Cues: Practical Data Visualization. IEEE Computer Society Press and IEEE Press, 1993.Google Scholar
- 11.S. Kossl)~. Understanding charts and graphs.Applied Cognitive Psychology, 3:185-226,1989.Google ScholarCross Ref
- 12.W.Levie. Research on pictures: a guide to the literature. In D. Willows and H. Houghton, editors, The Psychology oflllustration: Basic Research, volume 1, chapter2, pages 1-50. Springer-Verlag, New York, 1987.Google ScholarCross Ref
- 13.J. Levin, G. Anglin, and R. Carney. On empirically validating functions of pictures in prose. In D. Willows and H. Houghton, editors, The Psychology of lllustration: Basic Research, volume 1, chapter 2, pages 51--86. Springer-Verlag, New York, 1987.Google ScholarCross Ref
- 14.G. Lol~e, K. Biolsi, and H. Rueter. A classification of visual representations. Communications of the A CM, 37(12):36--49, 1994. Google ScholarDigital Library
- 15.W. Mann and S. Thompson. Rhetorical structure theory: Towards a functional theory oftext organization. In TEXT, volume 2, pages 243- 281. Springer, 1988.Google Scholar
- 16.J. Marks. A formal speeifieation scheme for network diagrams that fadlitates automated design. J. of Visual Languages and Computing, 2(4):395--414, 199 I. Google ScholarDigital Library
- 17.M. Maybury. Planning multimedia explanations using communicative acts. In M.Maybury, editor, Intelligent Multimedia Interfaces, chapter 2, pages 60--74. AAM Press/The MIT Press, Menlo Park, CA, 1993. Google ScholarDigital Library
- 18.tC MeKeown. Text Generation. Cambridge University Press, London, 1985.Google Scholar
- 19.IC Mullet and D. Sano. Designing Visual Interfaces. SunSoft Press, Mountain View, CA, 1995.Google ScholarDigital Library
- 20.S. Roth and W. Hefley. Intelligent multimedia presentation systems: Research and principles, in M. Maybury, editor, Intelligent Multimedia Interfaces, chapter 1, pages 13-58. AAAI Press/The M1T Press, Menlo Park, CA, 1993. Google ScholarDigital Library
- 21.S.F. Roth and J. Mattis. Automating the presentation of information. In Proc. IEEE Conf. on AI Applications, pages 90--97, 1991.Google ScholarCross Ref
- 22.C. Sehmid. Handbook of graphic presentation. The Ronald Press, New York, 1954.Google Scholar
- 23.D. Seligmann. A Visual Language for Automated 3D Graphics Generation. PhD thesis, Columbia University, New York, NY, 1993.Google Scholar
- 24.A. Suteliffe and J. Darzentas. Use of visual media in explanation. In M. Tauber, D. Mahling, and F. Arefi, editors, Cognitive Aspects of Visual Languages and Visual Interfaces, chapter2, pages 105-132. Elsevier Science B.V., Amsterdam, 1994.Google Scholar
- 25.A. Treisman. Perceptual grouping and attention in visual search for features and for objects. J. of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 8(2):194-214, 1982.Google ScholarCross Ref
- 26.E.R. Tufte. The VisuaIDisplay of Quantitative Information. Graphics Press, Cheshire, CT, 1983. Google ScholarDigital Library
- 27.E.R. Tufte. Envisioning Information. Graphics Press, Cheshire, CT, 1990. Google ScholarDigital Library
- 28.E.R. Tufte. Visual Explanations: Images and Quantities, Evidence and Narrative. Graphics Press, Cheshire, CT, 1997. Google ScholarDigital Library
- 29.R. Wehrend and C. Lewis. A problem-oriented classification of visualization techniques. In Proceedings of the First IEEE Conference on Visualization: Visualization 90, pages 139-143. IEEE, Los Aiamitos, CA, October 1990. Google ScholarDigital Library
- 30.W. Winn and W. Holliday. Design pdneiples for diagrams and charts. In D. Jonassen, editor, The Technology of Text, volume 1, pages 277- 299. Educational Technology Publications, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, 1982.Google Scholar
- 31.H. Zettl. Sight Sound Motion: Applied Media Aesthetics. Wadsworth Publishing Company, Belmont, CA, second edition, 1990.Google Scholar
- 32.M. Zhou and S. Feiner. Top-down hierarchical planning of coherent visual discourse. In Proc. 1111"97, pages 129-136, Orlando, FL, January 1997. Google ScholarDigital Library
Index Terms
- Visual task characterization for automated visual discourse synthesis
Recommendations
Automated Visual Presentation: From Heterogeneous Information to Coherent Visual Discourse
Special issue on information visualization: the next frontierAutomated visual presentation systems should be able to design effective presentations for heterogeneous (quantitative and qualitative) information. They should also be able to work in static or interactive environments and capable of employing a wide ...
A depth perception and visual comfort guided computational model for stereoscopic 3D visual saliency
With the emerging development of three-dimensional (3D) related technologies, 3D visual saliency modeling is becoming particularly important and challenging. This paper presents a new depth perception and visual comfort guided saliency computational ...
Comments