skip to main content
10.1145/2750675.2750683acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesmobisysConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

An Autonomous Multi-UAV System for Search and Rescue

Published:18 May 2015Publication History

ABSTRACT

This paper proposes and evaluates a modular architecture of an autonomous unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) system for search and rescue missions. Multiple multicopters are coordinated using a distributed control system. The system is implemented in the Robot Operating System (ROS) and is capable of providing a real-time video stream from a UAV to one or more base stations using a wireless communications infrastructure. The system supports a heterogeneous set of UAVs and camera sensors. If necessary, an operator can interfere and reduce the autonomy. The system has been tested in an outdoor mission serving as a proof of concept. Some insights from these tests are described in the paper.

References

  1. COMETS project. http://www.comets-uavs.org/, 2002-2005.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. CLOSE-SEARCH. http://www.close-search-project.eu/, 2009.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. RESCUECELL. http://www.rescuecell.eu/the-project/, 2013.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. SHERPA. http://www.sherpa-project.eu/sherpa/, 2013-2017.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. A. L. Adams, T. A. Schmidt, C. D. Newgard, C. S. Federiuk, M. Christie, S. Scorvo, and M. DeFreest. Search is a time-critical event: When search and rescue missions may become futile. Wilderness & Environmental Medicine, 18(2):95--101, 2007.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. A. Agarwal, M. H. Lim, T. N. Nguyen, and M. J. Er. Parallel region coverage using multiple UAVs. In Proceedings of the IEEE Aerospace Conference, pages 8 pp.--, 2006.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. T. Andre, K. Hummel, A. Schoellig, E. Yanmaz, M. Asadpour, C. Bettstetter, P. Grippa, H. Hellwagner, S. Sand, and S. Zhang. Application-driven design of aerial communication networks. Communications Magazine, IEEE, 52(5):129--137, May 2014.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. P. Baran. On distributed communications networks. IEEE Transactions of the Professional Technical Group on Communications Systems, 12(1), March 1964.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. D. Casbeer, R. Beard, T. McLain, S.-M. Li, and R. Mehra. Forest fire monitoring with multiple small uavs. In Proceedings of the American Control Conference, pages 3530--3535 vol. 5, June 2005.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. M. Cummings. Operator interaction with centralized versus decentralized UAV architectures. In Handbook of Unmanned Aerial Vehicles, pages 977--992. 2014.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. J. Gancet, G. Hattenberger, R. Alami, and S. Lacroix. Task planning and control for a multi-UAV system: architecture and algorithms. In Proceedings of International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS), 2005.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. S. Kacianka and H. Hellwagner. Adaptive video streaming for UAV networks. In Proceedings of the 7th Workshop on Mobile Video, MoVid'15, Portland, OR, USA, 2015. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. S. Lacroix, R. Alami, T. Lemaire, G. Hattenberger, and J. Gancet. Decision making in multi-UAVs systems: Architecture and algorithms. In Multiple Heterogeneous Unmanned Aerial Vehicles, volume 37 of Springer Tracts in Advanced Robotics, pages 15--48. 2007.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  14. S. Waharte, N. Trigoni, and S. J. Julier. Coordinated search with a swarm of UAVs. In Proceedings of IEEE Conference on Sensor, Mesh and Ad Hoc Communications and Networks Workshops (SECON Workshops), pages 1--3, Rome, Italy, June 2009.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  15. D. P. Watson and D. H. Scheidt. Autonomous systems. Johns Hopkins APL Technical Digest, 26(4):368--376, 2005.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. S. Yahyanejad, M. Quaritsch, and B. Rinner. Incremental, orthorectified and loop-independent mosaicking of aerial images taken by micro UAVs. In Proceedings of IEEE International Symposium on Robotic and Sensors Environments (ROSE), pages 137--142, Montreal, QC, Canada, September 2011.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  17. S. Yahyanejad and B. Rinner. A fast and mobile system for registration of low-altitude visual and thermal aerial images using multiple small-scale UAVs. ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, pages 1--14, 2014.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. E. Yanmaz, S. Hayat, J. Scherer, and C. Bettstetter. Experimental performance analysis of two-hop aerial 802.11 networks. In Proceedings of the Wireless Communication and Networking Conference. IEEE, April 2014.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  19. E. Yanmaz, R. Kuschnig, and C. Bettstetter. Achieving air-ground communications in 802.11 networks with three-dimensional aerial mobility. In Proceedings of IEEE Conference on Computer Communications (INFOCOM), pages 120--124, 2013.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Index Terms

  1. An Autonomous Multi-UAV System for Search and Rescue

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader