skip to main content
10.1145/275487.275491acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagespodsConference Proceedingsconference-collections
Article
Free Access

Logic based modeling and analysis of workflows

Published:01 May 1998Publication History
First page image

References

  1. 1.G. Alomo, D. Agrawal, A. E1 Abbadi, M. Kamath, R. Gtlnth~r, and C. Mohan. Advanced transaction models in workflow contexts, in International Con. /evener on Data Engineering, New Orleans, Louisiana, February 1996. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. 2.G AlonBo, D. Agrawal, A. El Abbadi, and C. Mohan. I;kmcfionaUty and limitations of current workflow management systems. In IEEE.Ezpert (to appear in a special issue on Cooperative Information Systems}, 1997.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.P, Attic, M. Singh, A. Sheth, and M. Rusintdewicz. Specifying and enforcing intertask dependencies. In 1ntl, Uonferenee on Very ~arge Data Bases, 1993. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. 4.A,J, Bonner and M. Kifer. An overview of transaction logic, Theoretical Computer Science, 133:205-265, October 1994. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. 5.A,J, Bormer and M. Kifer. Transaction logic protramming (or a logic of declarative and procedural knowledge). Technical Report CSRI-323, University of Toronto, November 1995. Unpublished manuscript.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.A.J. Bonnet and M. Kifer. Concurrency and communieation in transaction logic. In Joint Intl. Conference and Symposium on Zogie Programming, pages 142-156, Bonn, Germany, September 1996. MIT Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.A.J, Bonner, M. Kifer, and M. Consens. Database protramming in transaction logic. In A. Ohori C. Beeri and D.E, Shasha, editors, Proceedings of the International Workshop on Database Programming Languages, Workshops in Computing, pages 309-337. SpHnger-Verlag, February 1994. Workshop held on Aug 30-Sept I, 1993, New York City, NY. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. 8.O, Bukhres and E. Kueshn, Eds. Special issue on software support for work flow management. Distributed and .Parallel Databases---An International Journal, z(2), ap zGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.Edmund M. Clarke, E. Allen Emerson, and A. Ptasad Sinl;la, Automatic verification of finite-state concurrent systems using temporal logic specifications. In .4CM ~t'ansaetions on .Programming Languages and Systems (TOPLAS), pages 244-263, 1986. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. 10.Worldtow Management Coalition. Terminology and glossary, Technical Report (WFMC-TC-1011), Workflow Management Coalition, Brussels, 1996.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.U, Dayal, M. Hsu, and R. Ladin. Organizing Iongrunning activities with triggers and transactions. In A UM SIGMOD Conference on Managemen~ of Data, 1990, Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. 12.A, Elmagarmid, Y. Leu, W. Litwin, and M, Rusinldewcz. A multi - database transaction model for interbase. In Intl. Conference on Very Large Data Bases, 1990. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. 13.A,K, Elmagarmid, editor. Database Transaction Mod. ~In for Advanced Applications. Morgan-Kaufmann, San Ma~eo, CA, 1992. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. 14.E,A, Emerson. Temporal and modal logic. In Handbook of Tl~eoretieal Computer Science, pages 997-1072, 1990. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. 15.H. Garda-Mol~a and K. Salem. Sagas. In Intl. Conference on Very Large Data Bases, pages 249--259, May 1987.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.M.R. Garey and D.S. Johnson. Computers and Intractability: A Guide to the Theory of NP- Completeness. Freeman and Company, San Frandseo, CA, 1978. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. 17.D. Georgakopoulos, M. Hornick, P. Krychniak, and F. Manola. Spedfication and management of extended transactions in a programmable transaction environment. In International Conference on Data Engineering, Houston, TX, February 1994. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. 18.D. Georgakopoulos, M. Hornick, and A. Sheth. An overview of workflow management: From process modeling to infrastructure for automation. Journal on Distributed and Parallel Database Systems, 3C2):119--153, April 1995. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. 19.R. Gunthor. Extended transaction processing based on dependency rules. In Proceedings of the RIDE-IMS Workshop, 1993.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  20. 20.M. Hsu, Ed. Special issue on workflow systems. Bulletin of the Technical Committee on Data Engineering (IEEE Computer Society), 18(1), March 1995.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.M. Kifer. Transaction logic for the busy worldlow professional. Unpublished manuscript, August 1996.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.J. Klein. Advanced rule-driven transaction managemerit, in IEEE COMPCON. IEEE, 1991.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.R. Mi}ncr. Communication and Concurrency. Prentice Hall, 1989. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. 24.M.E. Orlowska, J. Rajapakse, and A.H.M. ter Hofstede. Verification problems in conceptual workflow specifications. In Intl. Conference on Conceptual Modelling, volume 1157 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Cottbus, Germany, 1996. Springer-Verlag. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. 25.M. Rusinkiewicz and A. Sheth. Specification and execution of transactional worldtows. In W. Kim, editor, In Modern Database Systems: The Object Model, In. teroperability, and Beyond. ACM Press, 1994. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  26. 26.M.P. Singh. Semantical considerations on workflows: An algebra for intertask dependendes. In -proceedings of the International Workshop on Database Programming Languages, Gubbio, Umbria, Italy, September 6--8 1995. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  27. 27.M.P. Singh. Synthesizing distributed constrained events from transactional workflow specifications, In Proceedings of 12-th IEEE Intl. Conference on Data Engineering, pages 616-623, New Orleans, LA, February 1996. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  28. 28.H. Wachtcr and A. Rearer. The ConTract model. In {13}, chapter 7, pages 220-263. 1992. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  29. 29.Dirk Wodtke and Gerhard Weikum. A formal foundation for distributed workflow execution based on state charts. In Intl. Conference on Database Theory, pages 230-246, 1997. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Logic based modeling and analysis of workflows

            Recommendations

            Comments

            Login options

            Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

            Sign in
            • Published in

              cover image ACM Conferences
              PODS '98: Proceedings of the seventeenth ACM SIGACT-SIGMOD-SIGART symposium on Principles of database systems
              May 1998
              286 pages
              ISBN:0897919963
              DOI:10.1145/275487

              Copyright © 1998 ACM

              Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

              Publisher

              Association for Computing Machinery

              New York, NY, United States

              Publication History

              • Published: 1 May 1998

              Permissions

              Request permissions about this article.

              Request Permissions

              Check for updates

              Qualifiers

              • Article

              Acceptance Rates

              PODS '98 Paper Acceptance Rate28of119submissions,24%Overall Acceptance Rate642of2,707submissions,24%

            PDF Format

            View or Download as a PDF file.

            PDF

            eReader

            View online with eReader.

            eReader