skip to main content
10.1145/2757226.2757238acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication Pagesc-n-cConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Strategies for Embodied Design: The Value and Challenges of Observing Movement

Published:22 June 2015Publication History

ABSTRACT

In this paper, we investigate the value and challenges of observing movement experience in embodied design. We interviewed three design researchers selected from a CHI2014 panel on designing for the experiential body. For each designer, we analyzed a publication describing their process of observing movement experience. By analyzing the interviews and publications, we studied how these researchers observe movement and how they articulate it in their design process. From our study, we contribute a set of techniques for performing movement observation inspired by somatics and body-based practices which we define as: attunement, attention, and kinesthetic empathy. We illustrate how these techniques have been applied by the selected researchers, and also highlight the remaining challenges related to articulating, translating, and sharing the felt movement experience in the context of design within HCI. Finally, we address these challenges by arguing for further exploration of movement frameworks from the fields of somatics, body-based practices, and movement studies as specific strategies that can be applied to HCI.

References

  1. Alexander, C. The Nature of Order: An Essay on the Art of Building and the Nature of the Universe, Book 2. Taylor & Francis, 2002.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Balzarotti, S., Piccini, L., Andreoni, G., and Ciceri, R. "I Know That You Know How I Feel": Behavioral and Physiological Signals Demonstrate Emotional Attunement While Interacting with a Computer Simulating Emotional Intelligence. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior 38, 3 (Apr. 2014), 283--299.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Blom, L. A., and Chaplin, L. T. The intimate act of choreography. University of Pittsburgh Press, 1982.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. Calvo-Merino, B., Gr'ezes, J., Glaser, D. E., Passingham, R. E., and Haggard, P. Seeing or Doing? Influence of Visual and Motor Familiarity in Action Observation. Current Biology 16, 19 (Oct. 2006), 1905-1910.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Corbin, J., and Strauss, A. Basics of Qualitative Research: Techniques and Procedures for Developing Grounded Theory, vol. 14. SAGE Publications, 2007.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Corness, G., Carlson, K., and Schiphorst, T. Audience empathy: a phenomenological method for mediated performance. In Proc C&C "11, ACM (2011), 127--136. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Damasio, A. Looking for Spinoza: Joy, Sorrow, and the Feeling Brain. Houghton Miffin Harcourt, 2003.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Depraz, N., Varela, F. J., and Vermersch, P. On Becoming Aware: A pragmatics of experiencing. John Benjamins Publishing, 2003.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. Dourish, P. Where The Action Is: The Foundations of Embodied Interaction. MIT Press, 2001. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. Fdili Alaoui, S., Caramiaux, B., Serrano, M., and Bevilacqua, F. Dance Movement Quality as Interaction Modality. In Proc DIS'12, ACM (2012), 761--769. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Feldenkrais, M. Awareness through movement: health exercises for personal growth. Harper & Row, 1972.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Fogtmann, M. H., Fritsch, J., and Aarhus, D. Kinesthetic Interaction - Revealing the Bodily Potential in Interaction Design. In Proc OzCHI (2008), 89--96. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Gaver, W., Boucher, A., Pennington, S., and Walker, B. Cultural probes and the value of uncertainty. interactions 11, 5 (2004), 53--56. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Glass, R. 8. Observer Response to Contemporary Dance. In: Grove, Robin; Stevens, Catherine; McKechnie, Shirley. Thinking in Four Dimensions: Creativity and Cognition in Contemporary Dance. (2005), 107--121.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Höök, K. Transferring qualities from horseback riding to design. Proc NordiCHI'10 (2010), 226--235. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Hughes, J., King, V., Rodden, T., and Andersen, H. The role of ethnography in interactive systems design. interactions 2, 2 (1995), 56--65. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Jola, C., Abedian-Amiri, A., Kuppuswamy, A., Pollick, F. E., and Grosbras, M.-H. Motor Simulation without Motor Expertise: Enhanced Corticospinal Excitability in Visually Experienced Dance Spectators. PLoS ONE 7, 3 (2012), e33343.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Kirsh, D. Embodied cognition and the magical future of interaction design. ACM ToCHI 20, 1 (2013), 1--30. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. Kozel, S. Closer : performance, technologies, phenomenology. MIT Press, 2007.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Laban, R., and Ullmann, L. Modern educational dance. MacDonald and Evans, 1963.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. Latulipe, C., Carroll, E. A., and Lottridge, D. Love, hate, arousal and engagement: exploring audience responses to performing arts. In Proc CHI'11, ACM (2011), 1845--1854. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. Lee, W., and Shusterman, R. Practicing Somaesthetics : Exploring Its Impact on Interactive Product Design Ideation. In Proc DIS'14, ACM (2014), 1055--1064. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. Loke, L., and Khut, G. P. Surging Verticality: An Experience of Balance. In Proc TEI'11, ACM (2011), 237--240. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. Loke, L., and Robertson, T. Moving and making strange. ACM ToCHI 20, 1 (Mar. 2013), 1--25. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. Maranan, D. S., Fdili Alaoui, S., Schiphorst, T., Pasquier, P., Subyen, P., and Bartram, L. Designing For Movement: Evaluating Computational Models using LMA Effort Qualities. In Proc CHI'14, ACM (2014), 991--1000. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  26. Martin, J. Introduction to the dance. Dance Horizons, New York, 1978.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. Mentis, H., Hook, K., Mueller, F., Isbister, K., Khut, G. P., and Robertson, T. Designing for the experiential body. In Proc CHI'14, ACM (2014), 1069--1074. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  28. Mentis, H., and Johansson, C. Seeing Movement Qualities. In Proc CHI'13, ACM (2013), 3375--3384. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  29. Merleau-Ponty, M. Phenomenology of Perception. Editions Gallimard, 1945.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  30. Millen, D. R. Rapid ethnography: time deepening strategies for hci field research. In Proc DIS'00, ACM (2000), 280--286. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  31. Moen, J. From hand-held to body-worn: embodied experiences of the design and use of a wearable movement-based interaction concept. In Proc TEI'07, ACM (2007), 251--258. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  32. Moore, C., and Yamamoto, K. Beyond Words: Movement Observation and Analysis. Gordon and Breach., (1988).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  33. Petitmengin-peugeot, C., and Varela, P. The Intuitive Experience. In The View from Within. First-person approaches to the study of consciousness (1999), 43--77.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  34. Reason, M., and Reynolds, D. Kinesthesia, Empathy, and Related Pleasures: An Inquiry into Audience Experiences of Watching Dance. Dance Research Journal 42, 02 (Apr. 2012), 49--75.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  35. Schiphorst, T. Self-evidence: applying somatic connoisseurship to experience design. In Proc CHI'11, ACM (2011), 145--160. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  36. Stevens, C., Winskel, H., Howell, C., Vidal, L.-M., Latimer, C., and Milne-Home, J. Perceiving Dance Schematic Expectations Guide Experts' Scanning of a Contemporary Dance Film. Journal of Dance Medicine & Science 14, 1 (2010), 19--25.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  37. Wright, P., and McCarthy, J. Empathy and experience in hci. In Proc. CHI'08, ACM (2008), 637--646. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Strategies for Embodied Design: The Value and Challenges of Observing Movement

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      C&C '15: Proceedings of the 2015 ACM SIGCHI Conference on Creativity and Cognition
      June 2015
      420 pages
      ISBN:9781450335980
      DOI:10.1145/2757226

      Copyright © 2015 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 22 June 2015

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

      Acceptance Rates

      C&C '15 Paper Acceptance Rate23of88submissions,26%Overall Acceptance Rate108of371submissions,29%

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader