Designing technology for and with developmentally diverse children: a systematic literature review

ABSTRACT

This paper presents the results of a systematic literature review of research papers on the involvement of developmentally diverse children in design. The review shows that there is a growing tendency to include developmentally diverse children in the design process. Compared to other groups of developmentally diverse children, children with high-functioning autism between 8 and 12 years old are the ones that are most often actively involved in the design process. Other groups of children often have a more passive role, being observed, both in the requirements, design and evaluation phase. Working with mixed groups of children, either children with different disabilities, or typically developing children together with developmentally diverse children, also occurs more seldom. Compared to design with typically developing children, adults are involved more intensively in the design, either as users, proxies, experts and/or facilitators. Specific guidelines for how to prepare and perform design sessions with developmentally diverse children often emphasize the need for a coherence of activities, a clear structure in the sessions, verbal as well as textual explanations, and the active participation of caregivers, teachers and therapists. Based on these findings we give several suggestions for further research.

References

1. APA. 2000. American Psychiatric Association: Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders - DSM-IV-TR.
2. Armstrong, T. 2010. Neurodiversity: discovering the extraordinary gifts of autism, ADHD, dyslexia, and other brain differences. Da Capo Press, Cambridge, MA.
3. Boyle, C., Boulet, S, Schieve, L et. al. 2011. Trends in the Prevalence of Developmental Disabilities in US Children, 1997--2008. Pediatrics 127, 6, 1034--1042
4. Benton, L. and Johnson, H. 2014. Structured approaches to participatory design for children: can targeting the needs of children with autism provide benefits for a broader child population? Instructional Science 42, 1, 47--65.
5. Druin, A. 2002. The role of children in the design of new technology. Behaviour & Information Technology 21, 1, 1--25.
6. Fails, J. A., Guha, M. L., and Druin, A. 2013. Methods and Techniques for Involving Children in the Design of New Technology for Children. Foundations and Trends in Human--Computer Interaction 6, 2, 85--166.
7. Guha, M. L., Druin, A., and Fails, J. A. 2008. Designing with and for children with special needs: an inclusionary model. In Proc. of IDC '08, ACM Press, New York, NY 61--64.
8. Jensen, J. and Skov, M. 2005. A review of research methods in children's technology design. In Proc. of IDC '05, ACM Press, New York, NY, 318--324.
9. Jones, J. C. 1992. Design methods. Van Nostrand Reinhold, New York.
10. Maguire, M. 2001. Methods to support human-centred design. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 55, 4, 587--634.
11. N.d. 2015. Developmental/Intellectual disability. McGraw-Hill Dictionary of Scientific & Technical Terms, 6E.
12. Pontual da Rocha Falcão, T. 2014. Discovery learning with tangible technologies: the case of children with intellectual disabilities. Doctoral Thesis, University of London.
13. Read, J., Gregory, P., MacFarlane, S., McManus, B., Gray, P., and Patel, R. 2002. An investigation of participatory design with children-informant, balanced and facilitated design. In Proc. of IDC '02, ACM Press, New York, NY.
14. Singer, J. 1999. 'Why can't you be normal for once in your life?'. In Disability Discourse. Maidenhead, UK, 59--67.
15. Yarosh, S., Radu, I., Hunter, S., and Rosenbaum, E. 2011. Examining values: an analysis of nine years of IDC research. In Proc. of IDC '11, ACM Press, New York, NY, 136--144.

Index Terms

• Human-centered computing

  • Human computer interaction (HCI)

    • HCI theory, concepts and models

  • Interaction design

    • Interaction design theory, concepts and paradigms