Asaf Beasley
ABSTRACT
A number of social media studies have equated people's emotional states with the frequency with which they use affectively positive and negative words in their posts. We explore how such word frequencies relate to a ground truth measure of both positive and negative emotion for 515 Facebook users and 448 Twitter users. We find statistically significant but very weak (ρ in the 0.1 to 0.2 range) correlations between positive and negative emotion-related words from the Linguistic Inquiry Word Count (LIWC) dictionary and a well-validated scale of trait emotionality called the Positive and Negative Affect Schedule (PANAS). We test this for tweets and Facebook status updates, focus on different time slices around the completion of the survey, and consider participants who report expressing emotions frequently on social media. With rare exception, this pattern of low correlation persists, suggesting that for the typical user, dictionary-based sentiment analysis tools may not be sufficient to infer how they truly feel.
- L. F. Barrett. Descriptions, and retrospective ratings of emotion. Personality & Social Psychology Bulletin, 23(i10):1100, 1997.Google Scholar
- J. Bollen, B. Gonçalves, G. Ruan, and H. Mao. Happiness is assortative in online social networks. Artificial life, 17(3):237--251, 2011. Google ScholarDigital Library
- J. Bollen, A. Pepe, and H. Mao. Modeling public mood and emotion: Twitter sentiment and socio-economic phenomena. arXiv preprint arXiv:0911.1583, 2009.Google Scholar
- J. T. Cacioppo, W. L. Gardner, and G. G. Berntson. Beyond bipolar conceptualizations and measures: The case of attitudes and evaluative space. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 1(1):3--25, 1997.Google ScholarCross Ref
- R. B. Cialdini, R. E. Petty, and J. T. Cacioppo. Attitude and attitude change. Annual review of psychology, 32(1):357--404, 1981.Google Scholar
- L. Coviello, Y. Sohn, A. D. Kramer, C. Marlow, M. Franceschetti, N. A. Christakis, and J. H. Fowler. Detecting emotional contagion in massive social networks. PloS one, 9(3):e90315, 2014.Google ScholarCross Ref
- J. Crocker and C. T. Wolfe. Contingencies of self-worth. Psychological review, 108(3):593, 2001.Google ScholarCross Ref
- M. De Choudhury, M. Gamon, S. Counts, and E. Horvitz. Predicting depression via social media. In ICWSM, 2013.Google Scholar
- P. S. Dodds, K. D. Harris, I. M. Kloumann, C. A. Bliss, and C. M. Danforth. Temporal patterns of happiness and information in a global social network: Hedonometrics and twitter. PloS one, 6(12):e26752, 2011.Google ScholarCross Ref
- B. L. Fredrickson. The role of positive emotions in positive psychology: The broaden-and-build theory of positive emotions. American psychologist, 56(3):218, 2001.Google ScholarCross Ref
- D. Gildea and D. Jurafsky. Automatic labeling of semantic roles. Computational linguistics, 28(3):245--288, 2002. Google ScholarDigital Library
- R. González-Ibánez, S. Muresan, and N. Wacholder. Identifying sarcasm in twitter: a closer look. In Proceedings of the 49th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies: short papers- Volume 2, pages 581--586. Association for Computational Linguistics, 2011. Google ScholarDigital Library
- A. Gruzd, S. Doiron, and P. Mai. Is happiness contagious online? a case of twitter and the 2010 winter olympics. In System Sciences (HICSS), 2011 44th Hawaii International Conference on, pages 1--9. IEEE, 2011. Google ScholarDigital Library
- C. Hutto and E. Gilbert. Vader: A parsimonious rule-based model for sentiment analysis of social media text. In Eighth International AAAI Conference on Weblogs and Social Media, 2014.Google ScholarCross Ref
- O. Irsoy and C. Cardie. Opinion mining with deep recurrent neural networks. In Proceedings of the 2014 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP), pages 720--728, 2014.Google ScholarCross Ref
- A. M. Isen, K. A. Daubman, and G. P. Nowicki. Positive affect facilitates creative problem solving. Journal of personality and social psychology, 52(6):1122, 1987.Google Scholar
- L. Jiang, M. Yu, M. Zhou, X. Liu, and T. Zhao. Target-dependent twitter sentiment classification. In Proceedings of the 49th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies-Volume 1, pages 151--160. Association for Computational Linguistics, 2011. Google ScholarDigital Library
- J. H. Kahn, R. M. Tobin, A. E. Massey, and J. A. Anderson. Measuring emotional expression with the linguistic inquiry and word count. The American journal of psychology, pages 263--286, 2007.Google Scholar
- A. D. Kramer. An unobtrusive behavioral model of gross national happiness. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pages 287--290. ACM, 2010. Google ScholarDigital Library
- A. D. Kramer. The spread of emotion via facebook. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pages 767--770. ACM, 2012. Google ScholarDigital Library
- A. D. Kramer, J. E. Guillory, and J. T. Hancock. Experimental evidence of massive-scale emotional contagion through social networks. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 111(24):8788--8790, 2014.Google ScholarCross Ref
- J. Kruschke. Doing Bayesian data analysis: A tutorial introduction with R. Academic Press, 2010. Google ScholarDigital Library
- C. W. Leach, M. van Zomeren, S. Zebel, M. L. Vliek, S. F. Pennekamp, B. Doosje, J. W. Ouwerkerk, and R. Spears. Group-level self-definition and self-investment: a hierarchical (multicomponent) model of in-group identification. Journal of personality and social psychology, 95(1):144, 2008.Google Scholar
- A. R. McConnell. The multiple self-aspects framework: Self-concept representation and its implications. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 2010.Google Scholar
- S. M. Mohammad, S. Kiritchenko, and X. Zhu. Nrc-canada: Building the state-of-the-art in sentiment analysis of tweets. In Proceedings of the Second Joint Conference on Lexical and Computational Semantics (SEMSTARâĂŹ13), 2013.Google Scholar
- S. M. Mohammad, X. Zhu, and J. Martin. Semantic role labeling of emotions in tweets. ACL 2014, page 32, 2014.Google ScholarCross Ref
- A. Pak and P. Paroubek. Twitter as a corpus for sentiment analysis and opinion mining. In LREC, volume 10, pages 1320--1326, 2010.Google Scholar
- M. Park, D. W. McDonald, and M. Cha. Perception differences between the depressed and non-depressed users in twitter. In Seventh International AAAI Conference on Weblogs and Social Media, 2013.Google Scholar
- J. W. Pennebaker, R. J. Booth, and M. E. Francis. Linguistic inquiry and word count: Liwc {computer software}. Austin, TX: liwc. net, 2007.Google Scholar
- D. Quercia, L. Capra, and J. Crowcroft. The social world of twitter: Topics, geography, and emotions. In ICWSM, 2012.Google Scholar
- D. Quercia, J. Ellis, L. Capra, and J. Crowcroft. Tracking gross community happiness from tweets. In Proceedings of the ACM 2012 conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work, pages 965--968. ACM, 2012. Google ScholarDigital Library
- R. S. Ritter, J. L. Preston, and I. Hernandez. Happy tweets: Christians are happier, more socially connected, and less analytical than atheists on twitter. Social Psychological and Personality Science, page 1948550613492345, 2013.Google Scholar
- S. Schachter and J. Singer. Cognitive, social, and physiological determinants of emotional state. Psychological review, 69(5):379, 1962.Google ScholarCross Ref
- N. Schwarz. Emotion, cognition, and decision making. Cognition & Emotion, 14(4):433--440, 2000.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Y. R. Tausczik and J. W. Pennebaker. The psychological meaning of words: Liwc and computerized text analysis methods. Journal of language and social psychology, 29(1):24--54, 2010.Google Scholar
- D. Watson, L. A. Clark, and A. Tellegen. Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: the panas scales. Journal of personality and social psychology, 54(6):1063, 1988.Google Scholar
- B. Yang and C. Cardie. Extracting opinion expressions with semi-markov conditional random fields. In Proceedings of the 2012 Joint Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing and Computational Natural Language Learning, pages 1335--1345. Association for Computational Linguistics, 2012. Google ScholarDigital Library
Index Terms
- Emotional States vs. Emotional Words in Social Media
Recommendations
Emojis influence emotional communication, social attributions, and information processing
AbstractMany emojis symbolize nonverbal cues that are used during face-to-face communication. Despite their popularity, few studies have examined how emojis influence digital interactions. The present study addresses this gap by measuring the ...
Highlights- Emojis convey information about the sender's affect.
- Senders that use positive ...
Emotional clouds: Showing arousal and valence through the movement and darkness of digital cartoonish clouds
While nowadays the most usual way to show emotions in digital contexts is via virtual characters, its use may raise false expectations (the user attributes human abilities to the virtual character). This paper proposes and explores an approach to ...
Corona and value change. The role of social media and emotional contagion
AbstractPeople share their emotions on social media and evidence suggests that in times of crisis people are especially motivated to post emotional content. The current Coronavirus pandemic is such a crisis. The online sharing of emotional content during ...
Comments