skip to main content
10.1145/2787622.2787724acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesicerConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Boys' Needlework: Understanding Gendered and Indigenous Perspectives on Computing and Crafting with Electronic Textiles

Published: 09 August 2015 Publication History

Abstract

We draw attention to the intersection of race/ethnicity and gender in computing education by examining the experiences of ten American Indian boys (12-14 years old) who participated in introductory computing activities with electronic textiles. To date, the use of electronic textiles (e-textiles) materials in introductory computing activities have been shown to be particularly appealing to girls and women because they combine craft, circuitry, and computing. We hypothesized that e-textiles would be appealing to American Indian boys because of a strong community-based craft tradition linked to heritage cultural practices. In order to understand boys' perspectives on learning computing through making culturally-relevant e-textiles artifacts, we analyzed boys' completed artifacts as documented in photographs and code screenshots, their design practices as documented in daily field notes and video logs of classroom sessions, and their reflections from interviews guided by the following research questions: (1) How did American Indian boys initially engage with e-textiles materials? (2) How did boys? computational perspectives develop through the process of making and programming their own e-textiles artifacts? Our findings highlight the importance of connecting to larger community value systems as a context for doing computing, the importance of allowing space for youth to make decisions within the constraints of the design task, and the value of tangible e-textiles artifacts in providing linkages between home and school spaces. We connect our work to other efforts to engage racial and ethnic minority students in computing and discuss the implications of our work for computer science educators designing computing curricula for increasingly diverse groups of students, especially as pertains to the emerging field of culturally responsive computing.

References

[1]
Aal, K., von Rekpwski, T., Yerousis, G., Wulf, V., & Weibert, A. (2015). Bridging (gender-rleated) barriers: A comparative study of intercultural computer clubs. Proceedings of Gender and Information Technology (Gender IT). Philadelphia, PA: USA: ACM.
[2]
Bang, M., Marin, A., Faber, L., & Suzokovich, E., III. (2013). Repatriating Indigenous technologies is an urban Indian community. Urban Education, 48(5), 705--733.
[3]
Baretto, F. & Benitti, V. 2012. Exploring the educational potential of robotics in schools: A systematic review. Computers & Education, 58, 978--988.
[4]
Biju, S. M. (2013). Taking advantage of Alice to teach programming concepts. E-Learning and Digital Media, 10(1), 22--29.
[5]
Brayboy, B. M. J. & Maughan, E. (2009). Indigenous knowledges and the story of the bean. Harvard Educational Review, 79(1), 1--21.
[6]
Brennan, K. & Resnick, M. 2012, April. New frameworks for studying and assessing the development of computational thinking. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
[7]
Buechley, L. & Hill, B. (2010). LilyPad in the Wild: How hardware's long tail issupporting new engineering and design communities. Proceedings of Designing Interactive systems (DIS) (pp. 199--207). Aarhus: Denmark: ACM.
[8]
Buechley, L. & Eisenberg, M. (2008). The LilyPad Arduino: Toward wearable engineering for everyone. IEEE Pervasive Computing, 7(2), 12--15.
[9]
Buechley, L. & Perner-Wilson, H. (2012). Crafting technology: Reimagining the processes, materials, and cultures of electronics. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction, 19(3), 21:1--21:21.
[10]
Charmaz, C. (2000). Grounded theory: objectivist and constructivist methods. In N. K. Denzin and Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (pp. 509--535). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
[11]
Cohoon, J., & Aspray, W. (Eds.). (2006). Women and information technology. Cambridge, MA: Massachusetts Institute of Technology Press.
[12]
Deloria, V., Deloria, B., Foehner, K., & Scinta, S. (1999). Spirit & Reason: The Vine Deloria, Jr., Reader. Fulcrum Publishing.
[13]
Dewhurst, M., Keawe, L., MacDowell, M., Okada-Carlson, C. N. K., & Wong, A. K. (2013). Ka ulana 'ana i ka piko (In weaving you begin at the center): Perspectives from a culturally specific approach to arts education. Harvard Educational Review, 83(1), 136--146.
[14]
Dimond, J. & Guzdial, M. 2008. More than paradoxes to Offer: Exploring motivations to attract women to computing. Georgia Institute of Technology Technical Report. Retrieved on August 27, 2012 from: http://gacomputes.cc.gatech.edu/Members/jpdimond/dimondParadoxes.pdf
[15]
DiSalvo, B. & Bruckman, A. (2011). From interests to values: Computer science is not that difficult but wanting to learn it is. Communications of the ACM 54, 8, 27--29.
[16]
DiSalvo, B., Guzdial, M., Bruckman, A., & McKlin, T. (2014). Saving face while geeking out: Video game testing as a justification for learning computer science. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 23(3), 272--315.
[17]
Dyson, L. E., Hendriks, M., & Grant, S. (Eds.). (2007). Information technology and indigenous people. Hershey, PA: Information Science Publishing.
[18]
Eglash, R. & Bennett, A. (2009). Teaching with hidden capital: Agency in children's explorations of cornrow hairstyles. Children, Youth, and Environments, 19(1), 58--73.
[19]
Eglash, R., Bennett, A., O'Donnell, C., Jennings, S., & Cintorino, M. (2006). Culturally situated design tools: Ethnocomputing from field site to classroom. American Anthropologist, 108(2), 347--362.
[20]
Eglash, R., Gilbert, J., & Foster, E. (2013). Broadening participation: Toward culturally responsive computing education. Communications of the ACM, 56(7), 33--36.
[21]
Eglash, R., Gilbert, J., Taylor, V., & Geier, S. R. (2013). Culturally responsive computing in two urban, after-school contexts: Two approaches. Urban Education, 48(5), 629--656.
[22]
Ensmenger, N. (2010). The computer boys take over. Cambridge, MA: Massachusetts Institute of Technology Press.
[23]
Fields, D. & Enyedy, N. (2013). Picking up the mantle of "expert": Assigned roles, assertion of identity, and peer recognition within a programming class. Mind, Culture, and Activity, 20(2), 113--131.
[24]
Forte, A. & Guzdial, M. 2004. Motivation and nonmajors in computer science: Identifying discrete audiences from introductory courses. IEEE Transactions on Education, 48 (2), 248--253.
[25]
Golsteijn, C., van den Hoven, E., Frolich, D., & Sellen, A. (2014). Hybrid crafting: Towards an integrated practice of crafting with physical and digital components. Personal and Ubiquitous Computing, (18), 593--611.
[26]
Hermes, M., Bang, M. and Marin, A. (2012). Designing Indigenous Language Revitalization. Harvard Educational Review, 82(3), 381--402.
[27]
Hill, S. H. (1997). Weaving new worlds: Southeastern Cherokee women and their basketry. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.
[28]
Hull, G. A., Kenney, N. L., Marple, S., & Forsman-Schneider, A. (2006, Spring). Many versions of masculine: An exploration of boys' identity formation through digital storytelling in an afterschool program. Afterschool Matters, 6, 1--42.
[29]
Jacobs, J. & Zoran, A. (2015). Hybrid practices in the Kalahari: Design collaboration through digital tools and hunter-gatherer craft. Proceedings of CHI 2015 (pp. 619--628). Seoul, Republic of Korea: ACM.
[30]
Kafai, Y. B., & Burke, W. Q. (2014). Connected code. Cambridge, MA: Massachusetts Institute of Technology Press.
[31]
Kafai, Y. B. Fields, D. A., & Searle, K. A. (2014). Electronic textiles as disruptive designs in schools: Supporting and challenging maker activities for learning. Harvard Educational Review, 84(4), 532--556.
[32]
Kafai, Y., Lee, E., Searle, K., Kaplan, E., Fields, D., & Lui, D. (2014). A Crafts-Oriented Approach to Computing in High School: Introducing Computational Concepts, Practices, and Perspectives with Electronic Textiles. ACM Transactions on Computing Education, 14(1), 1--20.
[33]
Kafai, Y. B. & Peppler, K. A. (2011). Youth, technology, and DIY: Developing participatory competencies in creative media production. Review of Research in Education, 35, 89--119.
[34]
Kafai, Y. B., Searle, K. A., Martinez, C., & Brayboy, B. (2014). Ethnocomputing with Electronic Textiles: Culturally Responsive Open Design to Broaden Participation in Computing in American Indian Youth and Communities. SIGCSE '14: Proceedings of the 45th SIGCSE technical symposium on computer science education (pp. 241--246). Atlanta, GA: Association of Computing Machinery.
[35]
Kapur, M. (2014). Comparing learning from productive failure and vicarious failure. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 23(4), 651--677.
[36]
Kelleher, C., Pausch, R., and Kiesler, S. (2007). Storytelling Alice Motivates Middle School Girls to Learn Computer Programming. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 1455--1464). San Jose, CA.
[37]
Keene, A. (2015, Feb. 4). Nike gets it right; Brand collaborates with O'odham designer. Indian Country Today. Retrieved on April 19, 2015 from: http://indiancountrytodaymedianetwork.com/2015/02/04/keene-nike-gets-it-right-brand-collaborates-oodham-designer-159028
[38]
Kulkarni, Y.R. (2013). Small ideas, big opportunities: FabLab at Vigyan Ahram Oabal, India. In, Walter-Hermann, J. & Büching, C. (Eds.), FabLab: Of machines, makers and inventors (pp. 231--237). Bielefeld: Transcript Verlag.
[39]
Lameman, B. A., Lewis, J. E., & Fragnito, S. (2010). Skins 1.0: A curriculum for designing games with First Nations youth. In Proceedings of FuturePlay 2010 (pp. 105--112). Vancouver BC: ACM.
[40]
Margolis, J. & Fisher, A. 2002. Unlocking the clubhouse. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
[41]
Margolis, J. Estella, R., Goode, J., Holme, J., & Nao, K. 2008. Stuck in the shallow end: Education, race, and computing. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
[42]
Meerbaum-Salant, O., Armoni, M., & Ben-Ari, M. (2010). Learning computer science concepts with Scratch. Proceedings of ICER 2010 (pp. 69--76). Aarhus, Denmark: ACM.
[43]
Millner, A. & Baafi, E. (2011). Modkit: Blending and extending approachable platforms for creating computer programs and interactive objects. In Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Interaction Design and Children (IDC '11) (pp. 250--253). ACM: Ann Arbor, MI.
[44]
Nakamura, L. (2014). Indigenous circuits: Navajo women and the racialization of early electronics manufacture. American Quartery, 66(4), 919--941.
[45]
Nasir, N. S. (2012). Racialized Identites. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
[46]
National Science Foundation (2014). Science and Engineering Indicators 2014. Retrieved on February 19, 2015 from http://www.nsf.gov/statistics/seind14/content/etc/nsb1401.pdf.
[47]
Oldenziel, R. (1999). Making technology masculine: Men, women, and modern machines in America. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.
[48]
Parker, R. (1986/2011). The subversive stitch. New York: I. B. Tauris.
[49]
Porter, L., Guzdial, M., McDowell, C., & Simon, B. (2013). Success in introductory programming: What works? Communications of the ACM, 56(8), 34--36.
[50]
Searle, K. A. & Kafai, Y. B. (2015). Culturally responsive making with American Indian girls: Bridging the identity gap in crafting and computing with electronic textiles. To appear in Proceedings of Gender IT.
[51]
Star, S. L. & Griessemer, J. R. (1989). Institutional ecology, "translations" and boundary objects: Amateurs and professionals in Berkeley's Museum of Vertebrate Zoology, 1907--39. Social Studies of Science, 19(3), 387--420.
[52]
Tan, E., Calabrese-Barton, A., Kang, H., & O'Neill, T. (2013). Desiring a career in STEM-related fields: How middle school girls articulate and negotiate identities-in-practice in science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 50(10), 1143--1179.
[53]
Wing, J. (2006). Computational thinking. Communications of the ACM, 49, 33--35.
[54]
Wolber, D., Abelson, H., Spertus, E. & Looney, L. 2011. App Inventor: Create your own Android apps. Sebastopol, CA: O'Reilly Media, Inc.
[55]
Yardi, S. & Bruckman, A. 2007. What is computing? Bridging the gap between teenagers? perceptions and graduate students' experiences. Proceedings of the 3rd International Workshop on Computing Education Research (pp. 39--50), Atlanta, GA.

Cited By

View all
  • (2025)K12 Computer Science Teachers' Attitudes Toward a Foundational Assumption of EthnocomputingProceedings of the 56th ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education V. 110.1145/3641554.3701891(638-644)Online publication date: 12-Feb-2025
  • (2024)Girls’ Reluctance and Intersectional Identities in STEM-Rich MakerspacesEducation Sciences10.3390/educsci1406062814:6(628)Online publication date: 11-Jun-2024
  • (2024)Body and Code: A Distributed Cognition Exploration Into Dance and Computing LearningProceedings of the 16th Conference on Creativity & Cognition10.1145/3635636.3656206(196-210)Online publication date: 23-Jun-2024
  • Show More Cited By

Index Terms

  1. Boys' Needlework: Understanding Gendered and Indigenous Perspectives on Computing and Crafting with Electronic Textiles

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Information & Contributors

      Information

      Published In

      cover image ACM Conferences
      ICER '15: Proceedings of the eleventh annual International Conference on International Computing Education Research
      July 2015
      300 pages
      ISBN:9781450336307
      DOI:10.1145/2787622
      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Sponsors

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      Published: 09 August 2015

      Permissions

      Request permissions for this article.

      Check for updates

      Badges

      • Best Paper

      Author Tags

      1. american indian/alaska native
      2. broadening participation in computing
      3. electronic textiles
      4. gender
      5. indigenous peoples
      6. k-12

      Qualifiers

      • Research-article

      Funding Sources

      • National Science Foundation

      Conference

      ICER '15
      Sponsor:

      Acceptance Rates

      ICER '15 Paper Acceptance Rate 25 of 96 submissions, 26%;
      Overall Acceptance Rate 189 of 803 submissions, 24%

      Upcoming Conference

      ICER 2025
      ACM Conference on International Computing Education Research
      August 3 - 6, 2025
      Charlottesville , VA , USA

      Contributors

      Other Metrics

      Bibliometrics & Citations

      Bibliometrics

      Article Metrics

      • Downloads (Last 12 months)43
      • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)3
      Reflects downloads up to 17 Feb 2025

      Other Metrics

      Citations

      Cited By

      View all
      • (2025)K12 Computer Science Teachers' Attitudes Toward a Foundational Assumption of EthnocomputingProceedings of the 56th ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education V. 110.1145/3641554.3701891(638-644)Online publication date: 12-Feb-2025
      • (2024)Girls’ Reluctance and Intersectional Identities in STEM-Rich MakerspacesEducation Sciences10.3390/educsci1406062814:6(628)Online publication date: 11-Jun-2024
      • (2024)Body and Code: A Distributed Cognition Exploration Into Dance and Computing LearningProceedings of the 16th Conference on Creativity & Cognition10.1145/3635636.3656206(196-210)Online publication date: 23-Jun-2024
      • (2024)"Different and Boundary-Pushing:" How Blind and Low Vision Youth Live Code TogetherProceedings of the 16th Conference on Creativity & Cognition10.1145/3635636.3656200(627-637)Online publication date: 23-Jun-2024
      • (2024)Supporting the Development of AI Literacy Competencies Within Creative Computing EnvironmentsProceedings of the 2024 ACM Conference on International Computing Education Research - Volume 210.1145/3632621.3671422(529-530)Online publication date: 12-Aug-2024
      • (2024)Developing Culturally Sustaining Elementary Computer Science Education with Indigenous Communities: Lessons Learned through a Research-Practice PartnershipProceedings of the 55th ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education V. 110.1145/3626252.3630827(1126-1132)Online publication date: 7-Mar-2024
      • (2024)Cultural-Centric Computational EmbroideryProceedings of the 55th ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education V. 110.1145/3626252.3630818(673-679)Online publication date: 7-Mar-2024
      • (2024)DanceBits 'It tells you to see us': Supporting Dance Practices with an Educational Computing KitProceedings of the Eighteenth International Conference on Tangible, Embedded, and Embodied Interaction10.1145/3623509.3633350(1-19)Online publication date: 11-Feb-2024
      • (2024)Interactive Murals: New Opportunities for Collaborative STEAM LearningProceedings of the 2024 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3613904.3641987(1-19)Online publication date: 11-May-2024
      • (2024)An interaction analysis of a computer science co-design conversation on cultural relevance and its implications for designJournal of Research on Technology in Education10.1080/15391523.2024.240235457:1(235-247)Online publication date: 7-Oct-2024
      • Show More Cited By

      View Options

      Login options

      View options

      PDF

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader

      Figures

      Tables

      Media

      Share

      Share

      Share this Publication link

      Share on social media