Spatial Skills Training in Introductory Computing

ABSTRACT

This paper explores the question as to whether there is a relationship between a student's spatial abilities and her achievement in learning to program. After noting that there does seem to be a correlation, the paper explores the impact of trying to improve a student's spatial abilities. The paper reports on a preliminary study involving high school students. The study results suggest a correlation exists between receiving training in spatial skills and improved student performance in introductory computing. While the sample size in the study is small, this improvement appears to occur for students of different races/ethnicities and across different socio-economic statuses.

References

1. Barke, H.-D. & Engida, T. 2001. Structural Chemistry and Spatial Ability in Different Cultures. Chemistry Education: Research and Practice in Europe, 2(3): p. 227--239.
2. Bowers, D. & Evans, D. 1990. The role of visualization in engineering design. Proceedings of the NSF Symposium on Modernization of the Engineering Design Graphics Curriculum, Austin, TX, 89--94.
3. California Department of Education. Academic performance index. http://www.cde.ca.goc/ta/ac/ap/ Accessed 8/28/2014.
4. Casey, B. M., Dearing, E., Vasilyeva, M., Ganley, C. and Tine, M. 2011. Spatial and numerical predictors of measurement performance: The moderating effects of community poverty and gender. Journal of Educational Psychology, 103: 296--311.
5. Cohen, C. & Hegarty, M. 2007. Individual differences in use of external visualization to perform an internal visualization task. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 21, 701--711.
6. College Board. (2010). 2009 ap computer science a released exam. New York: The College Board.
7. Fahey, T., Keilthy, P. & Polek, E. 2012. Family relationships and family well-being: A study of the families of nine year-olds in ireland. Dublin: University College Dublin.
8. Fennema, E. & Sherman, J. 1977. Sexual stereo-typing and mathematics learning. Arithmetic Teacher, 24(5), 369--372.
9. Fennema, E., & Sherman, J. 1977. Sex-related differences in mathematics achievement, spatial visualization and affective factors. American educational research journal, 14(1), 51--71.
10. Field, B. W. 1994. A course in spatial visualization. Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Engineering Design Graphics and Descriptive Geometry, Tokyo, Japan, 257--261.
11. Fincher, S., Baker, B., Box, I., Cutts, Q., de Raadt, M., Haden, P., Hamer, J., Hamilton, M., Lister, R. & Petre, M. 2005. Programmed to succeed? A multi-national, multi-institutional study of introductory programming courses (University of Kent, Computing Laboratory Technical Report 1-05). http://www.cs.kent.ac.uk/pubs/2005/2157/ Accessed 8/25/2014
12. Fisher, M., Cox, A. & Zhao, L. 2006. Using sex differences to link spatial cognition and program comprehension. In Proceedings of the 22nd IEEE International Conference on Software Maintenance (ICSM), 289--298.
13. Gimmestad, B. J. 1989. Gender differences in spatial visualization and predictors of success in an engineering design course. Proceedings of the National Conference on Women in Mathematics and the Sciences, St. Cloud, MN, 133--136.
14. Guay, R. B. 1976. Purdue spatial visualization test: Rotations. West Lafayette, IN, Purdue Research Foundation.
15. Gunderson, E. A., Ramirez, G., Levine, S. C., & Beilock, S. L. 2012. The role of parents and teachers in the development of gender-related math attitudes. Sex Roles, 66(3-4), 153--166.
16. Guzdial, M., Ericson, B., McKlin, T. & Engelman, S. 2012. A statewide survey on computing education pathways and influences: factors in broadening participation in computing. In Proceedings of the ninth annual international conference on International computing education research (ICER '12), 143--150.
17. Hattie, J. 2013. Visible learning: A synthesis of over 800 meta-analyses relating to achievement. Routledge.
18. Hier, D. B. & Crowley, Jr., W. F. 1982. Spatial ability in androgen-deficient men. New England Journal of Medicine, 306(20), 1202--1205.
19. Hoegh, A. & Moskal, B. 2009. Examining science and engineering students' attitudes toward computer science. In Proceedings of the Frontiers in Education Conference, San Antonio, Texas (6 pages).
20. Hyde, J. S. 1981. How large are cognitive gender differences? A meta-analysis using ω2 and d. American Psychologist, 36(8), 892--901.
21. Jones, S. & Burnett, G. 2007. Spatial skills and navigation of source code. In Proceedings of ITiCSE 2007, 231--235.
22. Jones, S. & Burnett, G. 2008. Spatial ability and learning to program. Human Technology, 4(1), 47--61.
23. Krogstad, J. & Cohn, D. 2014. U.S. census looking at big changes in how it asks about race and ethnicity. Available from: http://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2014/03/14/u-s-census-looking-at-big-changes-in-how-it-asks-about-race-and-ethnicity/ Accessed 8/29/2014
24. Liberatos, P., Link, B. & Kelsey, J. 1988. The measurement of social class in epidemiology. Epidemiologic Reviews, 10, 87--121.
25. Levine, S. C., Vasilyeva, M., Lourenco, S. F., Newcombe, N. S. & Huttenlocher, J. 2005. Socioeconomic status modifies the sex difference in spatial skill. Psychological Science. American Psychological Society, 16(11) 841--845.
26. Lindberg, S. M., Hyde, J. S., Petersen, J. L., & Linn, M. C. 2010. New trends in gender and mathematics performance: a meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 136(6), 1123--1135.
27. Linn, M. C. & Petersen, A. C. 1985. Emergence and characterization of sex differences in spatial ability: A meta-analysis. Child Development, 56, 1479--1498.
28. Maccoby, E. E. & Jacklin, C. N. (Eds.). 1974. The psychology of sex differences (Vol. 1). Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
29. Maier, P. H. (1994). Raeumliches vorstellungsvermoegen. Frankfurt a.M., Berlin, Bern, New York, Paris, Wien: Lang.
30. Mayer, R. E., Dyck, J. L. & Vilberg, W. 1986. Learning to program and learning to think: What's the connection? Communications of the ACM, 29, 605--610.
31. McKim, R. H. 1980. Experiences in visual thinking. Boston, MA: PWS Publishers.
32. Moskal, B., Lurie, D. & Cooper, S. 2004. Evaluating the effectiveness of a new instructional approach. SIGCSE Bull. 36, 1 (March 2004), 75--79.
33. Newcombe, N., Bandura, M. M., & Taylor, D. G. 1983. Sex differences in spatial ability and spatial activities. Sex Roles, 9(3), 377--386.
34. Norman, K. L. 1994. Spatial visualization-A gateway to computer-based technology. Journal of Special Educational Technology, XII(3), 195--206.
35. Office of Measurement and Evaluation of Teaching, University of Pittsburgh. Item difficulty item discrimination. http://www.omet.pitt.edu/docs/OMET%20Test%20and%20Item%20Analysis.pdf Accessed 8/29/2014
36. Ou, S.-R. & Reynolds, A. 2008. Predictors of educational attainment in the chicago longitudinal study. School Psychology Quarterly, 23(2), 199--229.
37. Shapiro, S. S., & Wilk, M. B. 1965. An analysis of variance test for normality (complete samples). Biometrika, 591--611.
38. Smith, I. M. 1964. Spatial ability-Its educational and social significance. London: University of London.
39. Sorby, S. A. & Baartmans, B. J. 1996. A course for the development of 3-D spatial visualization skills. Engineering Design Graphics Journal, 60(1), 13--20.
40. Sorby, S. A. & Gorska, R. A. 1998. The effect of various courses and teaching methods on the improvement of spatial ability. Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Engineering Design Graphics and Descriptive Geometry, Austin, TX, 252--256.
41. Sorby, S. A. 2000. Spatial abilities and their relationship to effective learning of 3-d modeling software. Engineering Design Graphics Journal, 64(3), 30--35.
42. Sorby, S. A. 2001. A course in spatial visualization and its impact on the retention of women engineering students. Journal of Women and Minorities in Science and Engineering, 7(2), 153--172.
43. Sorby, S. A. 2011. Developing Spatial Thinking Workbook. Boston, MA: Cengage Learning.
44. Study, N. E. 2006. Assessing and improving the below average visualization abilities of a group of minority engineering and technology students. Journal of Women and Minorities in Science and Engineering, 12 (4) 363--374.
45. Tartre, L. 1990. Spatial skills, gender, and mathematics. In E. H. Fennema & G. C. Leder (Eds.), Mathematics and Gender, (pp. 27--59). New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
46. Webb, N. 1984. Microcomputer learning in small groups: Cognitive requirements and group processes. Journal of Educational Psychology, 76, 1076--1088.
47. Weinburgh, M. 1995. Gender differences in student attitudes toward science: A meta-analysis of the literature from 1970 to 1991. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 32(4), 387--398.
48. Wiebe, E. N., Williams, L., Yang, K. & Miller, C. 2003. Computer Science Attitude Survey. (Report No.: NCSU CSC TR-2003-1) NC State University, Raleigh, NC.
49. Yoon, S. Y. (2011). Revised purdue spatial visualization test: Visualization of rotations (Revised PSVT:R) {Psychometric Instrument}

Index Terms

• Social and professional topics

  • Professional topics

    • Computing education

      • Computing education programs

        • Computer science education