skip to main content
10.1145/2797143.2797168acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageseannConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Neural Networks and Particle Swarm Optimization for Function Approximation in Tri-SWACH Hull Design

Authors Info & Claims
Published:25 September 2015Publication History

ABSTRACT

Tri-SWACH is a novel multihull ship design that is well suited to a wide range of industrial, commercial, and military applications, but which because of its novelty has few experimental studies on which to base further development work. Using a new form of particle swarm optimization that incorporates a strong element of stochastic search, Breeding PSO, it is shown it is possible to use multilayer nets to predict resistance functions for Tri-SWACH hullforms, including one function, the Residual Resistance Coefficient, which was found intractable with previously explored neural network training methods.

References

  1. Gougouldis, G. 2008. The utilization of artificial neural networks in marine applications: an overview. Naval Engineering Journal 120, 3 (Feb. 2008), 19--26.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Couser, P., Mason, A., Mason, G., Smith, C, and Von Konsky, B. 2004. Artificial neural networks for hull resistance prediction. In Proc. 3rd International Conference on Computer Applications in the Marine Industries (Siguënza, Spain, May 09-12, 2004). COMPIT '04. Springer, Netherlands, 391--402.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Royce, R., Mouravieff, A., and Zuzick. A. 2011. A trimaran resistance artificial neural network. In Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Fast Ship Transportation (Honolulu, Hawaii, USA, Sept. 26--29, 2011). FAST '11. American Soc. Naval Engineers, Alexandria, VA, 717--726.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Carter, A., Muk-Pavic, N., and McDonald, T. 2013. Resistance prediction using artificial neural networks for preliminary Tri-SWACH design. Trans. RINA, Vol. 156, Part A:, Intl. J. Maritime Engineering No.263, 141--152.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Chaggar, N. 2014. Tri-SWACH Resistance Prediction Using Artificial Neural Networks. MSc thesis, Dept. of Mechanical Engineering, University College London.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Klag, J., and McMahon, I. 2007. Calm Water Resistance Study of a Novel Trimaran. Doctoral thesis. Webb Institute, Glen Cove, USA.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Kennedy, J., and Eberhart, R. 1995. Particle swarm optimization. In IEEE International Conference Symposium on Neural Networks (Perth, Australia, Nov. 27-Dec. 01, 1995). IEEE Press, New York, NY, 1942--1948.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. Ilonen, J., Kamarainen, J.-K., and Lampinen, J. 2006. Differential evolution training algorithm for feed-forward neural networks. Neural Processing Letters 17, 1 (June 2006), 93--105. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Storn, R. and Price, K. 1997. Differential evolution -- a simple and efficient heuristic for global optimization over continuous spaces. Journal of Global Optimization 11, 4 (Dec. 1997), 341--359. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Liang, J.J., Qin, A.K., and Baskar, S. 2006. Comprehensive learning particle swarm optimizer for global optimization of multimodal functions. IEEE Trans. Evolutionary Computation 10, 3 (June 2006), 281--295. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Liang, J.J., Kai Qin, A., Suganthan, P.N., and Baskar, S. 2004. Evaluation of comprehensive learning particle swarm optimizer. In Proc. 11th International Conference on Neural Information Processing (Calcutta, India, Nov. 22--25, 2004). ICONIP 2004. Springer-Verlag, Berlin Heidelberg, Germany, 230--235.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Das, S., Abraham, A., Chakraborty, U., K., and Konar, A. 2009. Differential evolution using a neighborhood-based mutation operator. IEEE Trans. Evolutionary Computation 13, 3 (June 2009), 526--553 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Bengio, Y. 2009. Learning Deep Architectures for AI (Foundations and Trends in Machine Learning). Now Publishers Inc., Hanover, MA. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Ciresan, D., Meier, U., Masci, J., and Schmidhuber, J. 2012. Multi-column deep neural network for traffic sign classification. Neural Networks, 32 (Feb. 2009), 333--338. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Fortier, N., Sheppard, J.W., and Pillai, K.G. 2012. DOSI: Training artificial neural networks using overlapping swarm intelligence with local credit assignment. In Proc. 13th International Symposium on Advanced Intelligent Systems (Kobe, Japan, Nov. 20-24, 2012). ISIS '12. IEEE Press, New York, NY, 1420--1425.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Piotrowski, A.P. and Napiorkowski, J.J. 2011. Optimizing neural networks for river flow forecasting -- evolutionary computation methods versus the Levenberg--Marquardt approach. J. Hydrology, 407, 1 (Sept. 2011), 12--27.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Index Terms

  1. Neural Networks and Particle Swarm Optimization for Function Approximation in Tri-SWACH Hull Design

              Recommendations

              Comments

              Login options

              Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

              Sign in
              • Published in

                cover image ACM Other conferences
                EANN '15: Proceedings of the 16th International Conference on Engineering Applications of Neural Networks (INNS)
                September 2015
                266 pages
                ISBN:9781450335805
                DOI:10.1145/2797143

                Copyright © 2015 ACM

                Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

                Publisher

                Association for Computing Machinery

                New York, NY, United States

                Publication History

                • Published: 25 September 2015

                Permissions

                Request permissions about this article.

                Request Permissions

                Check for updates

                Qualifiers

                • research-article
                • Research
                • Refereed limited

                Acceptance Rates

                EANN '15 Paper Acceptance Rate36of60submissions,60%Overall Acceptance Rate36of60submissions,60%
              • Article Metrics

                • Downloads (Last 12 months)5
                • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0

                Other Metrics

              PDF Format

              View or Download as a PDF file.

              PDF

              eReader

              View online with eReader.

              eReader