skip to main content
10.1145/2801694.2801706acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesmobicomConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Multimodal Indoor Social Interaction Sensing and Real-time Feedback for Behavioural Intervention

Published:11 September 2015Publication History

ABSTRACT

Social interactions play an important role in people's personal as well as working life. Interactions come in various forms, identifiable mainly by duration and proximity. The ability to detect and distinguish interactions can often shed light over worktask performance, epidemic spreading, personal relationship development, use of space and more. Questionnaires and direct observations have often been used as mechanisms to identify interactions, however, these are either very expensive in terms of staff time, yield very coarse grained information or do not scale. Technology has started cutting costs by allowing automatic detection, however precise interaction identification often requires individuals to wear custom hardware. The aim of my work is to exploit the capabilities of off-the-shelf wearable devices (i.e. smart watches and fitness trackers) to build a social interactions sensing platform which offers accuracy and scalability. To this end, non-verbal behaviours, such as, body language, will be considered in addition to the occurrence of the interactions (individuals involved, duration and location) with the objective of providing unobtrusive real-time feedback.

References

  1. N. Aharony, W. Pan, C. Ip, I. Khayal, and A. Pentland. Social fmri: Investigating and shaping social mechanisms in the real world. Pervasive and Mobile Computing, 2011. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. J. Alvina, S. T. Perrault, T. Roumen, S. Zhao, M. Azh, and M. Fjeld. Omnivib: Towards cross-body spatiotemporal vibrotactile notifications for mobile phones. In Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, 2015. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. T. Baur, I. Damian, F. Lingenfelser, J. Wagner, and E. André. Nova: Automated analysis of nonverbal signals in social interactions. In Human Behavior Understanding. Springer, 2013. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. N. M. Bradburn, S. Sudman, E. Blair, and C. Stocking. Question threat and response bias. Public Opinion Quarterly, 1978.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. C. Brown, C. Efstratiou, I. Leontiadis, D. Quercia, and C. Mascolo. Tracking serendipitous interactions: How individual cultures shape the office. In Proceedings of the 17th ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work. ACM, 2014. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. C. Brown, C. Efstratiou, I. Leontiadis, D. Quercia, C. Mascolo, J. Scott, and P. Key. The architecture of innovation: Tracking face-to-face interactions with ubicomp technologies. In Proceedings of the 2014 ACM International Joint Conference on Pervasive and Ubiquitous Computing. ACM, 2014. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. R. S. Burt. Structural holes and good ideas. American journal of sociology, 110(2), 2004.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. J. M. Cabero, V. Molina, I. Urteaga, F. Liberal, and J. L. Martın. Acquisition of human traces with Bluetooth technology: Challenges and proposals. Ad Hoc Networks, 12, 2014. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. D. R. Carney, A. J. Cuddy, and A. J. Yap. Power posing brief nonverbal displays affect neuroendocrine levels and risk tolerance. Psychological Science, 2010.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. T. K. Choudhury. Sensing and modeling human networks. PhD thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 2003. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. I. Damian, C. S. S. Tan, T. Baur, J. Schöning, K. Luyten, and E. André. Augmenting social interactions: Realtime behavioural feedback using social signal processing techniques. In Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, 2015. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. A.-L. Fayard and J. Weeks. Photocopiers and water-coolers: The affordances of informal interaction. Organization studies, 2007.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. W. Huang, Y.-S. Kuo, P. Pannuto, and P. Dutta. Opo: a wearable sensor for capturing high-fidelity face-to-face interactions. In Proceedings of the 12th ACM Conference on Embedded Network Sensor Systems. ACM, 2014. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. P. Jeffrey and A. McGrath. Sharing serendipity in the workplace. In Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Collaborative Virtual Environments. ACM, 2000. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. S. Liu, Y. Jiang, and A. Striegel. Face-to-Face Proximity Estimation Using Bluetooth On Smartphones. IEEE Transactions on Mobile Computing, 2014. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. P. Lopes, A. Ion, W. Mueller, D. Hoffmann, P. Jonell, and P. Baudisch. Proprioceptive interaction. In Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, 2015. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. M. S. Mast. On the importance of nonverbal communication in the physician--patient interaction. Patient education and counseling, 2007.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. T. V. McGovern and H. E. Tinsley. Interviewer evaluations of interviewee nonverbal behavior. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 1978.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. D. O. Olguın and A. S. Pentland. Social sensors for automatic data collection. Proceedings of the 14th Americas Conference on Information Systems (AMCIS), 2008.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. A. Pentland. The new science of building great teams. Harvard Business Review, 90, 2012.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. I. Rossberg-Gempton and G. D. Poole. The effect of open and closed postures on pleasant and unpleasant emotions. The Arts in psychotherapy, 1993.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. T. Roumen, S. T. Perrault, and S. Zhao. Notiring: A comparative study of notification channels for wearable interactive rings. In Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, 2015. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. K. Sailer, R. Pachilova, and C. Brown. Human versus machine-testing validity and insights of manual and automated data gathering methods in complex buildings. In Proceedings of the 9th International Space Syntax Symposium. Sejong University Press, 2013.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. J. B. Stryker and M. D. Santoro. Facilitating face-to-face communication in high-tech teams. Research-Technology Management, 2012.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  25. W. F. Whyte. Street corner society: The social structure of an Italian slum. University of Chicago Press, 2012.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. E. Yoneki and J. Crowcroft. Epimap: Towards quantifying contact networks for understanding epidemiology in developing countries. Ad Hoc Networks, 2014. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Multimodal Indoor Social Interaction Sensing and Real-time Feedback for Behavioural Intervention

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      S3 '15: Proceedings of the 2015 Workshop on Wireless of the Students, by the Students, & for the Students
      September 2015
      56 pages
      ISBN:9781450337014
      DOI:10.1145/2801694

      Copyright © 2015 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 11 September 2015

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

      Acceptance Rates

      S3 '15 Paper Acceptance Rate10of25submissions,40%Overall Acceptance Rate65of93submissions,70%

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader