ABSTRACT
Manually inspecting text to assess whether an event occurs in a document collection is an onerous and time consuming task. Although a manual inspection to discard the false events would increase the precision of automatically detected sets of events, it is not a scalable approach. In this paper, we automatize event validation, defined as the task of determining whether a given event occurs in a given document or corpus. The introduction of automatic event validation as a post-processing step of event detection can boost the precision of the detected event set, discarding false events and preserving the true ones. We propose a novel automatic method for event validation, which relies on a supervised model to predict the occurrence of events in a non-annotated corpus. The data for training the model is gathered by exploiting the crowdsourcing paradigm. Experiments on real-world events and documents show that our proposed method (i) outperforms the state-of-the-art event validation approach and (ii) increases the precision of event detection while preserving recall.
- J. Allan, R. Papka, and V. Lavrenko. On-line new event detection and tracking. In SIGIR, 1998. Google ScholarDigital Library
- J. Araki and J. Callan. An annotation similarity model in passage ranking for historical fact validation. In SIGIR, 2014. Google ScholarDigital Library
- A. Ceroni and M. Fisichella. Towards an entity-based automatic event validation. In ECIR, 2014.Google ScholarCross Ref
- A. Das Sarma, A. Jain, and C. Yu. Dynamic relationship and event discovery. In Proc. of WSDM '11, 2011. Google ScholarDigital Library
- G. P. C. Fung, J. X. Yu, P. S. Yu, and H. Lu. Parameter free bursty events detection in text streams. In Proc. of VLDB '05, 2005. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Q. He, K. Chang, and E.-P. Lim. Analyzing feature trajectories for event detection. In Proc. of SIGIR '07, 2007. Google ScholarDigital Library
- J. Hoffart, F. Suchanek, K. Berberich, and G. Weikum. Yago2: A spatially and temporally enhanced knowledge base from Wikipedia. Artificial Intelligence, 2012. Google ScholarDigital Library
- D. Hovy, J. Fan, A. Gliozzo, S. Patwardhan, and C. Welty. When did that happen? linking events and relations to timestamps. EACL'12. Google ScholarDigital Library
- J. R. Landis and G. G. Koch. The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics, 1977.Google Scholar
- A. J. McMinn, Y. Moshfeghi, and J. M. Jose. Building a large-scale corpus for evaluating event detection on twitter. In CIKM, 2013. Google ScholarDigital Library
- T. Tran, A. Ceroni, M. Georgescu, K. Djafari Naini, and M. Fisichella. Wikipevent: Leveraging wikipedia edit history for event detection. In WISE. 2014.Google ScholarCross Ref
Index Terms
- Improving Event Detection by Automatically Assessing Validity of Event Occurrence in Text
Recommendations
Where the Event Lies: Predicting Event Occurrence in Textual Documents
SIGIR '16: Proceedings of the 39th International ACM SIGIR conference on Research and Development in Information RetrievalManually inspecting text in a document collection to assess whether an event occurs in it is a cumbersome task. Although a manual inspection can allow one to identify and discard false events, it becomes infeasible with increasing numbers of ...
Improving document-level event detection with event relation graph
Highlights- An event correlation-based document-level event detection model is proposed.
- An ...
AbstractThe correlation between events within the same document plays a crucial role in event detection. Most existing detection models often ignore event correlations, which is not applicable to multi-event detection at the document level. In ...
On integrating event definition and event detection
We develop, in this paper, a representation of time and events that supports a range of reasoning tasks such as monitoring and detection of event patterns which may facilitate the explanation of root cause(s) of faults. We shall compare two approaches ...
Comments