skip to main content
10.1145/2806416.2806624acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagescikmConference Proceedingsconference-collections
short-paper

Improving Event Detection by Automatically Assessing Validity of Event Occurrence in Text

Authors Info & Claims
Published:17 October 2015Publication History

ABSTRACT

Manually inspecting text to assess whether an event occurs in a document collection is an onerous and time consuming task. Although a manual inspection to discard the false events would increase the precision of automatically detected sets of events, it is not a scalable approach. In this paper, we automatize event validation, defined as the task of determining whether a given event occurs in a given document or corpus. The introduction of automatic event validation as a post-processing step of event detection can boost the precision of the detected event set, discarding false events and preserving the true ones. We propose a novel automatic method for event validation, which relies on a supervised model to predict the occurrence of events in a non-annotated corpus. The data for training the model is gathered by exploiting the crowdsourcing paradigm. Experiments on real-world events and documents show that our proposed method (i) outperforms the state-of-the-art event validation approach and (ii) increases the precision of event detection while preserving recall.

References

  1. J. Allan, R. Papka, and V. Lavrenko. On-line new event detection and tracking. In SIGIR, 1998. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. J. Araki and J. Callan. An annotation similarity model in passage ranking for historical fact validation. In SIGIR, 2014. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. A. Ceroni and M. Fisichella. Towards an entity-based automatic event validation. In ECIR, 2014.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. A. Das Sarma, A. Jain, and C. Yu. Dynamic relationship and event discovery. In Proc. of WSDM '11, 2011. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. G. P. C. Fung, J. X. Yu, P. S. Yu, and H. Lu. Parameter free bursty events detection in text streams. In Proc. of VLDB '05, 2005. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Q. He, K. Chang, and E.-P. Lim. Analyzing feature trajectories for event detection. In Proc. of SIGIR '07, 2007. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. J. Hoffart, F. Suchanek, K. Berberich, and G. Weikum. Yago2: A spatially and temporally enhanced knowledge base from Wikipedia. Artificial Intelligence, 2012. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. D. Hovy, J. Fan, A. Gliozzo, S. Patwardhan, and C. Welty. When did that happen? linking events and relations to timestamps. EACL'12. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. J. R. Landis and G. G. Koch. The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics, 1977.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. A. J. McMinn, Y. Moshfeghi, and J. M. Jose. Building a large-scale corpus for evaluating event detection on twitter. In CIKM, 2013. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. T. Tran, A. Ceroni, M. Georgescu, K. Djafari Naini, and M. Fisichella. Wikipevent: Leveraging wikipedia edit history for event detection. In WISE. 2014.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Index Terms

  1. Improving Event Detection by Automatically Assessing Validity of Event Occurrence in Text

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      CIKM '15: Proceedings of the 24th ACM International on Conference on Information and Knowledge Management
      October 2015
      1998 pages
      ISBN:9781450337946
      DOI:10.1145/2806416

      Copyright © 2015 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 17 October 2015

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • short-paper

      Acceptance Rates

      CIKM '15 Paper Acceptance Rate165of646submissions,26%Overall Acceptance Rate1,861of8,427submissions,22%

      Upcoming Conference

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader