skip to main content
10.1145/2806655.2806656acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageshtConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Social Media Mining: Impact of the Business Model and Privacy Settings

Published:01 September 2015Publication History

ABSTRACT

Social media platforms have changed our lives and it is unimaginable to do without them nowadays. A large quantity of data is created that way every day; information gathered through data mining on the basis of this data is used for important decisions. The source of this social media mining has not been questioned abundantly enough in recent research.

This paper represents a case study on the influence of the business model and privacy settings behind a social media platform onto the results of data mining built upon the data of these services. The social media platforms focused upon in this case are Facebook (FB) and Twitter.

References

  1. G. Barbier and H. Liu. Data mining in social media, pages 327--352. Springer, 2011.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. M. Boanjak, E. Oliveira, J. Martins, E. Mendes Rodrigues, and L. Sarmento. Twitterecho: a distributed focused crawler to support open research with twitter data. In Proceedings of the 21st international conference companion on World Wide Web, pages 1233--1240. ACM. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. S. Brooks. Does personal social media usage affect efficiency and well-being?, 2015.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. P. Burnap, R. Gibson, L. Sloan, R. Southern, and M. Williams. 140 characters to victory: Using twitter to predict the uk 2015 general election. arXiv preprint arXiv:1505.01511, 2015.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. F. Cheong and C. Cheong. Social media data mining: A social network analysis of tweets during the 2010--2011 australian floods. PACIS, 11:46--46, 2011.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. P. Domingos. Mining social networks for viral marketing. IEEE Intelligent Systems, 20(1):80--82, 2005.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. M. Ellman and F. Germano. What do the papers sell? a model of advertising and media bias*. The Economic Journal, 119(537):680--704, 2009.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. W. He, S. Zha, and L. Li. Social media competitive analysis and text mining: A case study in the pizza industry. International Journal of Information Management, 33(3):464--472, 2013.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. D. Helbing and S. Balietti. From social data mining to forecasting socio-economic crises. The European Physical Journal-Special Topics, 195(1):3--68, 2011.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. S. Humphries, K. Cowert, and C. Whelan. The utilization of communication technologies by study abroad participants. Communications of the IIMA, 6(1):5, 2006.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. F. Inc. Facebook reports first quarter 2015 results. Report, 2015.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. T. Inc. Twitter reports first quarter 2015 results; lowers full-year 2015 expectations. Report, 2015.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. A. M. Kaplan and M. Haenlein. Users of the world, unite! the challenges and opportunities of social media. Business Horizons, 53(1):59--68, 2010.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  14. J. H. Kietzmann, K. Hermkens, I. P. McCarthy, and B. S. Silvestre. Social media? get serious! understanding the functional building blocks of social media. Business Horizons, 54(3):241--251, 2011.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  15. S. Kumar, G. Barbier, M. A. Abbasi, and H. Liu. Tweettracker: An analysis tool for humanitarian and disaster relief. In ICWSM, 2011.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. S. Kumar, F. Morstatter, and H. Liu. Twitter data analytics. Springer, 2014. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. C. D. Manning, P. Raghavan, and H. Schütze. Introduction to information retrieval. Cambridge university press Cambridge, 2009. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. F. Morstatter, J. Pfeffer, H. Liu, and K. M. Carley. Is the sample good enough? comparing data from twitter's streaming api with twitter's firehose. arXiv preprint arXiv:1306.5204, 2013.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. F. Muller and F. Thiesing. Social networking apis for companies - an example of using the facebook api for companies. In Computational Aspects of Social Networks (CASoN), 2011 International Conference on, pages 120--123. IEEE.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. G. Osterberg. Update on the twitter archive at the library of congress. In Library of Congress, volume 4.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. D. Rinallo and S. Basuroy. Does advertising spending influence media coverage of the advertiser? Journal of Marketing, 73(6):33--46, 2009.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  22. A. Stefanidis, A. Crooks, and J. Radzikowski. Harvesting ambient geospatial information from social media feeds. GeoJournal, 78(2):319--338, 2013.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  23. E. A. Sultanik and C. Fink. Rapid geotagging and disambiguation of social media text via an indexed gazetteer. Proceedings of ISCRAM, 12:1--10, 2012.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. J. B. Walther and M. R. Parks. Cues filtered out, cues filtered in. Handbook of interpersonal communication, pages 529--563, 2002.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. J. Yin, A. Lampert, M. Cameron, B. Robinson, and R. Power. Using social media to enhance emergency situation awareness. IEEE Intelligent Systems, 27(6):52--59, 2012. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  26. Y. Zou. Social Media Review: The Impact of Social on Brand-Consumer Relationships, pages 624--624. Springer, 2015.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Social Media Mining: Impact of the Business Model and Privacy Settings

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      SIdEWayS '15: Proceedings of the 1st ACM Workshop on Social Media World Sensors
      September 2015
      30 pages
      ISBN:9781450337984
      DOI:10.1145/2806655

      Copyright © 2015 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 1 September 2015

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

      Acceptance Rates

      SIdEWayS '15 Paper Acceptance Rate3of6submissions,50%Overall Acceptance Rate6of13submissions,46%

      Upcoming Conference

      HT '24
      35th ACM Conference on Hypertext and Social Media
      September 10 - 13, 2024
      Poznan , Poland
    • Article Metrics

      • Downloads (Last 12 months)53
      • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)7

      Other Metrics

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader