skip to main content
10.1145/2807565.2807709acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesgenderitConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Lessons Learned With Girls, Games, and Design

Published:24 April 2015Publication History

ABSTRACT

Girls have long been dismissed and trivialized by the game industry. The Girls' Game Movement of the 1990s aimed to create games specifically for girls, but ultimately struggled to reach consensus on whether to make games catering to the feminine content that girls expressed interest in, or whether to challenge gender stereotypes and guide the ways that girls engage with games. Other research-based programs and interventions to engage girls in game design have faced similar difficulties, attempting to find balance between respecting girls' values and empowering them as designers. This paper offers a review of these programs, highlighting similarities in findings about what girls value in games and design, and synthesizing shared challenges and struggles. Analyzing past programs can be invaluable to contemporary educators, scholars, and designers looking to engage girls with game design and technology.

References

  1. American Association of University Women Foundation Commission on Technology, Gender, and Teacher Education. Tech-savvy: Educating girls in the new computer age, 2008. Retrieved from: http://history.aauw.org/files/2013/01/TechSavvy.pdfGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Beato, G. Girl games. Wired, 5, 4 (2007). http://archive.wired.com/wired/archive/5.04/es_girlgames.html?person=brenda_laurel&topic_set=wiredpeopleGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Berland, M., & Lee, V. R. Collaborative strategic board games as a site for distributed computational thinking. International Journal of Game-Based Learning, 1,2 (2001).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Brunner, C. Games and technological desire: Another decade. In Kafai, Y., Heeter, C., Denner, J. & Sun, J. Y. eds. From Barbie and Mortal Kombat: New perspectives on gender and gaming, MIT Press, Cambridge, 2008.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Brunner, C., Hawkins, J., & Honey, M. Making meaning: Technological expertise and the use of metaphor. Paper presented at the American Educational Research Association (AERA) Annual Meeting, New Orleans, LA, 1988.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Cassell, J. & Jenkins, H. Chess for girls? Feminism and computer games. In Cassell, J. & Jenkins, H. eds. From Barbie to Mortal Kombat: Gender and computer games. MIT Press, Cambridge, 1998. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Cassell, J. & Jenkins, H. Interview with Brenda Laurel. In Cassell, J. & Jenkins, H. eds. From Barbie to Mortal Kombat: Gender and computer games. MIT Press, Cambridge, 1998. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. De Castell, S. & Bryson, M. Retooling play: Dystopia, dysphoria, and difference. In Cassell, J. & Jenkins, H. eds. From Barbie to Mortal Kombat: Gender and computer games. MIT Press, Cambridge, 1998. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Denner, J. The Girls Creating Games Program: An innovative approach to integrating technology into middle school. Meridian: A Middle School Computer Technologies Journal, 1, 10 (2007).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Denner, J., Bean, S., & Martinez, J. The Girls Game Company: Engaging Latina girls in information technology. Afterschool Matters, 8, (2009), 26--35.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Denner, J. & Campe, S. What games made by girls can tell us. In Kafai, Y., Heeter, C., Denner, J. & Sun, J. Y. eds. From Barbie and Mortal Kombat: New perspectives on gender and gaming, MIT Press, Cambridge, 2008.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Flanagan, M., Howe, D. C., & Nissenbaum, H. Values at play: Design tradeoffs in socially-oriented game design. In Proc. SIGCHI 2005, ACM (2005). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Flanagan, M. & Nissenbaum, H. Design heuristics for activist games. In Kafai, Y., Heeter, C., Denner, J. & Sun, J. Y. eds. From Barbie and Mortal Kombat: New perspectives on gender and gaming, MIT Press, Cambridge, 2008.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Gee, G. P. What video games have to teach us about learning and literacy (2nd ed.). Palgrave MacMillan, New York, 2007.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Gee, J. P. & Hayes, E. R. Women and gaming: The Sims and 21st century learning. Palgrave MacMillan, New York, 2010.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  16. Hayes, E. Girls, gaming, and trajectories of IT experience. In Kafai, Y., Heeter, C., Denner, J. & Sun, J. Y. eds. From Barbie and Mortal Kombat: New perspectives on gender and gaming, MIT Press, Cambridge, 2008.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Hayes, E. R., & King, E. M. Not just a dollhouse: What The Sims 2 can teach us about women's IT learning. On the Horizon, 17, 1 (2009), 60--69.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  18. Heeter, C. & Winn B. Gender identity, play style, and the design of games for classroom learning In Kafai, Y., Heeter, C., Denner, J. & Sun, J. Y. eds. From Barbie and Mortal Kombat: New perspectives on gender and gaming, MIT Press, Cambridge, 2008.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Honey, M., Moeller, B., Brunner, C., Bennett, D., Clements, P., & Hawkins, J. Girls and design: Exploring the question of technological imagination, 1991. Retrieved from: http://cct.edc.org/sites/cct.edc.org/files/publications/08_1991.pdfGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Jenkins, H. & Cassell, J. From Quake Grrls to Desperate Housewives: A decade of gender and computer games. In Kafai, Y., Heeter, C., Denner, J. & Sun, J. Y. eds. From Barbie and Mortal Kombat: New perspectives on gender and gaming, MIT Press, Cambridge, 2008.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. Johnson, D. Devaluing and revaluing seriality: The gendered discourses of media franchising. Media, Culture & Society, 33, 7 (2011), 1077--1093.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. Kafai, Y. B. Gender differences in children's constructions of video games. In P. Greenfield & R. Cocking eds. Interacting with video, Ablex Publishing, Norwood, NJ, 1996.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. Kafai, Y. B. Video game designs by girls and boys: Variability and consistency of gender differences. In Cassell, J. & Jenkins, H. eds. From Barbie to Mortal Kombat: Gender and computer games. MIT Press, Cambridge, 1998. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. Martin, C., & Steinkuehler, C. Collective information literacy in massively multiplayer online games. E-Learning and Digital Media, 7, 4 (2010), 355--365.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  25. Orenstein, P. School girls, Doubleday, New York, 1994.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. Pipher, M. Reviving Ophelia: Saving the selves of adolescent girls, Riverhead Books, New York, 1994.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. Squire, K. Video games and learning: Teaching and participatory culture in the digital age. Teachers College Press, Cambridge, 2011.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  28. Steinkuehler, C. Massively multiplayer online gaming as a constellation of literacy practices. E-Learning, 4, 3 (2007), 297--318.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  29. Steinkuehler, C., & King, E. Digital literacies for the disengaged: creating after school contexts to support boys' game-based literacy skills. On the Horizon, 17, 1 (2009), 47--59.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  30. Stevens, R., Satwicz, T., & McCarthy, L. (2008). In-game, in-room, in-world: Reconnecting video game play to the rest of kids' lives. In Salen, K. ed. The ecology of games: Connecting youth, games, and learning, MIT Press, Cambridge, 2008.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Lessons Learned With Girls, Games, and Design

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in
      • Published in

        cover image ACM Other conferences
        GenderIT '15: Proceedings of the Third Conference on GenderIT
        April 2015
        68 pages
        ISBN:9781450335966
        DOI:10.1145/2807565

        Copyright © 2015 ACM

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 24 April 2015

        Permissions

        Request permissions about this article.

        Request Permissions

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • research-article
        • Research
        • Refereed limited

        Acceptance Rates

        Overall Acceptance Rate39of55submissions,71%

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader