skip to main content
10.1145/2808047.2808056acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageschinzConference Proceedingsconference-collections
short-paper

Identifying the characteristics of usability that encourage prolonged use of an Activity Monitor

Authors Info & Claims
Published:03 September 2015Publication History

ABSTRACT

Together with the use of rapid prototyping techniques and efforts to reduce the production cost, wearable and mobile electronic devices are brought to the market faster than ever, with less time spent on actual usability testing of these devices for prolonged use. Due to this, the usability lifespan of such electronic devices has reduced significantly where consumers might be moving or upgrading on to using newer electronic devices more often than they really need to. Therefore, this paper focuses on identifying key characteristics of usability that may encourage prolonged use of an activity monitoring device. Also, to observe and record any user acceptance and/or usability issues that may arise from using an activity monitor over a prolonged period.

References

  1. Babu, R. (2011). Developing an understanding of the nature of accessibility and usability problems blind students face in web-enhanced instruction environment. ISBN:9781124878652, Institution: The University of North Carolina at Greensboro. ProQuest, UMI Dissertations Publishing 2011.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Braun, V. and Clarke, V. (2006) Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3 (2). pp. 77--101. ISSN 1478-0887Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. Breakwell, G., Hammond, S., Fife-Schaw, C., & Smith, J. (2006 ). Research methods in psychology (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Caelli, K., Ray, L., & Mill, J. (2003). "Clear as mud": Toward greater clarity in generic qualitative research. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 2 (2), 1--24.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. Creswell, J. (2007). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Didem, A.K., & Ergüün, E. (2014). Multi-Criteria Usability Evaluation of Electronic Devices in a Fuzzy Environment. Human Factors and Ergonomics in Manufacturing & Service Industries, ISSN 1090-- 8471, 05/2014, Volume 24, Issue 3, pp. 336--347Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Flick, U. (2006). An introduction to qualitative research (Third ed.). London: Sage Publications.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Glaser, B. G. (1992). Basics of grounded theory analysis. Mill Valley: Sociology Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Herbert, S. (2000). For ethnography. Progress in Human Geography, ISSN 0309-1325, 12/2000, Volume 24, Issue 4, pp. 550--568Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Jones, G. (2006). Other research methods. In M. Walter (Ed.) Social research methods: An Australian perspective. Victoria: Oxford University Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Lyons, K., & Starner, T. (2001). Mobile capture for wearable computer usability testing. Proceedings Fifth International Symposium on Wearable Computers, ISSN 1530-0811, 2001, ISBN 9780769513188, pp. 69--76, IEEE. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Patton, M. (2002). Qualitative research & evaluation methods (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Ryu, Y.S. (2005). Development of usability questionnaires for electronic mobile products and decision making methods. Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, ProQuest, UMI Dissertations Publishing, 2005. 3177322.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Schensul, S.L., Schensul, J.J., & LeCompte, M.D. (1999). Essential Ethnographic Methods: Observations, Interviews, and Questionnaires. Ethnographer's toolkit, ISBN 0761991441, Volume 2, xxiii, 31Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Identifying the characteristics of usability that encourage prolonged use of an Activity Monitor

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Other conferences
      CHINZ 2015: Proceedings of the 15th New Zealand Conference on Human-Computer Interaction
      September 2015
      87 pages
      ISBN:9781450336703
      DOI:10.1145/2808047

      Copyright © 2015 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 3 September 2015

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • short-paper
      • Research

      Acceptance Rates

      CHINZ 2015 Paper Acceptance Rate8of23submissions,35%Overall Acceptance Rate8of23submissions,35%

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader