skip to main content
10.1145/2808047.2808061acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageschinzConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Translated Application Interfaces: Issues of Engagement

Published:03 September 2015Publication History

ABSTRACT

In New Zealand, English is the language that dominates contemporary technologies. Usability testing was completed on a range of applications, available with a Māori-language interface, to gauge levels of awareness, engagement and perception. Nearly all of the respondents were unaware of the availability of these interfaces but most indicated they would prefer to use the Māori-language versions. In terms of engagement and usability, users initially engaged using Māori but switched to English when they wanted to quickly complete the task at hand. Few remained fully engaged with the Māori-language interfaces. High levels of language switching were reported and some frustration as the participants encountered new and unfamiliar uses of words. At face value the feedback suggests the translated interfaces contained unnecessary complications and that better design and content might have enhanced the user experience. However, there is evidence that extended use would enable users to become more familiar with the interfaces alluding to initial barriers created by a previous competence in another language -- in this case English. With this previous competence in mind it might be more useful to employ design concepts that would alleviate initial difficulties and serve to keep the user engaged in the target language for longer periods of time.

References

  1. Armstrong, R. (2011). Language Death. Retrieved from http://www.uh.edu/engines/epi2723.htmGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Austin, P., & Sallabank, J. (Eds) (2011), The Cambridge handbook of endangered languages (pp. 27--44). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Chrisp, S. (2005). Māori Intergenerational Language Transmission. International Journal of the Sociology of Language, 172,149--181.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Crystal, D. (2000). Language Death. Retrieved from http://catdir.loc.gov/catdir/samples/cam032/99053220.pdfGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Grenoble, L., & Whaley, L. (2006). Saving languages: An introduction to language revitalization. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Harrison, K.D. (2007). When languages die: The extinction of the world's languages and the erosion of human knowledge. New York, USA: Oxford University Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Janson, T. (2002). Speak: A short history of languages. Oxford, UK:Oxford University Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Kalzner, K. (1995). The languages of the world. London, UK: Routledge.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Nettle, D., & Romaine, S. (2000). Vanishing Voices: The extinction of the world's languages. New York, USA: Oxford University Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Wurm, S. (Ed.) (1996). Atlas of the world's languages in danger of disappearing. Paris, France: UNESCO Publishing.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Translated Application Interfaces: Issues of Engagement

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in
      • Published in

        cover image ACM Other conferences
        CHINZ 2015: Proceedings of the 15th New Zealand Conference on Human-Computer Interaction
        September 2015
        87 pages
        ISBN:9781450336703
        DOI:10.1145/2808047

        Copyright © 2015 ACM

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 3 September 2015

        Permissions

        Request permissions about this article.

        Request Permissions

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • research-article
        • Research

        Acceptance Rates

        CHINZ 2015 Paper Acceptance Rate8of23submissions,35%Overall Acceptance Rate8of23submissions,35%

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader