skip to main content
10.1145/2808492.2808578acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesicimcsConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Efficient indexing for large-scale image search

Published:19 August 2015Publication History

ABSTRACT

In content-based image retrieval, inverted indexes allow fast access to database images and summarize all knowledge about the database. Indexing multiple clues of image contents allows retrieval algorithms search for relevant images from different perspectives, which is appealing to deliver satisfactory user experiences. However, when incorporating diverse image features during online retrieval, it is challenging to ensure retrieval efficiency and scalability. Besides that, most of current image indexing systems for retrieval view database as a set of individual images. It limits the flexibility of the retrieval framework to conduct sophisticated cross image analysis, resulting in higher memory consumption and sub-optimal retrieval accuracy. To conquer these two issues and achieve highly efficient indexing system, we propose a semantic-aware co-indexing algorithm to jointly embed multiple cues into the inverted indexes and a cross indexing strategy to group highly relevant image together. In this talk, these two algorithms will be introduced. A real-time large-scale image search system built on these algorithms will also be presented.

References

  1. Large scale visual recognition challenge. http://www.image-net.org/challenges/LSVRC/2010, 2010.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. R. Fagin, R. Kumar, and D. Sivakumar. Efficient similarity search and classification via rank aggregation. In ACM SIGMOD, 2003. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. A. Krizhevsky, I. Sutskever, and G. Hinton. Imagenet classification with deep convolutional neural networks. In NIPS, 2012.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. D. G. Lowe. Distinctive image features from scale invariant keypoints. IJCV, 60(2):91--110, 2004. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. D. Nistér and H. Stewénius. Scalable recognition with a vocabulary tree. In CVPR, 2006. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. E. Tomita, A. Tanaka, and H. Takahashi. The worst-case time complexity for generating all maximal cliques and computational experiments. Theoretical Computer Science, 363(1):28--42, 2006. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. A. Torralba, R. Fergus, and Y. Weiss. Small codes and large image databases for recognition. In CVPR, 2008.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. X. Wang, M. Yang, T. Cour, S. Zhu, K. Yu, and T. X. Han. Contextual weighting for vocabulary tree based image retrieval. In ICCV, 2011.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. F. X. Yu, R. Ji, M.-H. Tsai, G. Ye, and S.-F. Chang. Weak attributes for large-scale image retrieval. In CVPR, 2012. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. S. Zhang, Q. Huang, G. Hua, S. Jiang, W. Gao, and Q. Tian. Building contextual visual vocabulary for large-scale image applications. In ACM Multimedia, 2010. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. S. Zhang, Q. Tian, G. Hua, Q. Huang, and W. Gao. Descriptive visual words and visual phrases for image applications. In ACM Multimedia, 2009. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. S. Zhang, Q. Tian, G. Hua, W. Zhou, Q. Huang, H. Li, and W. Gao. Modeling spatial and semantic cues for large-scale near-duplicated image retrieval. Computer Vision and Image Understanding, 115(3):403--414, 2011. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. S. Zhang, Q. Tian, Q. Huang, W. Gao, and Y. Rui. USB: Ultra short binary descriptor for fast visual matching and retrieval. IEEE Transactions on Image Processing, 23(8):3671--3683, 2014.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  14. S. Zhang, Q. Tian, K. Lu, Q. Huang, and W. Gao. Edge-SIFT: Discriminative binary descriptor for scalable partial-duplicate mobile search. IEEE Transactions on Image Processing, 22(7):2889--2902, 2013.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  15. Y. Zhang, Z. Jia, and T. Chen. Image retrieval with geometry-preserving visual phrases. In CVPR, 2011.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. W. Zhou, Y. Lu, H. Li, Y. Song, and Q. Tian. Spatial coding for large scale partial-duplicate web image search. In ACM Multimedia, Florence, Italy, Oct. 25--29, 2010. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Efficient indexing for large-scale image search

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Other conferences
      ICIMCS '15: Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Internet Multimedia Computing and Service
      August 2015
      397 pages
      ISBN:9781450335287
      DOI:10.1145/2808492
      • General Chairs:
      • Ramesh Jain,
      • Shuqiang Jiang,
      • Program Chairs:
      • John Smith,
      • Jitao Sang,
      • Guohui Li

      Copyright © 2015 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 19 August 2015

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

      Acceptance Rates

      ICIMCS '15 Paper Acceptance Rate20of128submissions,16%Overall Acceptance Rate163of456submissions,36%
    • Article Metrics

      • Downloads (Last 12 months)1
      • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0

      Other Metrics

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader